Xbox 360, PS3, or Nintendo Revolution

Which console??


  • Total voters
    125
Sheep

Sheep

Audioholic Warlord
RedNightMare said:
Okay, iv played the PS,PS2,XBox,Nintendo Gamecube all of em, n ok...PS have the most games so there gona have an advantage n i believe the PS2 was the best consol, but wot is so good about the xbox.... i mean i believe its absoluly crap! its big enuff to be a door stopper n wot it only had one good game which i didnt even like (halo) whats with that??.. Why do alot of people put Nintendo Down i believe Nintendo Are doin a good job the only problem they had was they didnt have enuff games, it still dont make it a crap consol.... n also i cn understand if people think SEGA wer a let down but do people have to take the piss, i still believe that both Nintendo n Sega are Great companys which can produce great products......BECAUSE AT THE END OF THE DAY WEN U WER ABPUT 7 YRS OLD WHEN U WER PLAYIN UR OLD SKOOL GAMES LIKE STREET FIGHTER II N STREETS OF RAGE, WOT WER U PLAYIN ON......THE NINTENDO SNES N SEGA MEGA DRIVE!!!..... N THEN GAMEIN DAYS WER THE BEST OF MY LIFE N NO MATTER HOW GD THE GRAPHICS R N ANYTHING NOTHIN CAN BEAT THEM.

But u lot have all forgot about....havent you....oh well at the end of the day its ur choice....

Wow.....How do you- WOW........no comment.


SheepStar (IQ just dropped)
 
WndrBr3d

WndrBr3d

Full Audioholic
Being a proud owner of an XBox and a PS2, I must say that XBox has the definite advantage.

Between true 480p widescreen support, Dolby Digital 5.1 and and the ability to play a 4 player game without having to bust out an adapter... my feeling is the original XBox wins this battle hands down.

I'll give it to Sony that they have the larger game library, but XBox games have far richer content.
 
Sheep

Sheep

Audioholic Warlord
WndrBr3d said:
Being a proud owner of an XBox and a PS2, I must say that XBox has the definite advantage.

Between true 480p widescreen support, Dolby Digital 5.1 and and the ability to play a 4 player game without having to bust out an adapter... my feeling is the original XBox wins this battle hands down.

I'll give it to Sony that they have the larger game library, but XBox games have far richer content.
PS2 has dolby digital 5.1 and DTS. And its through an optical support, not some special over priced POS cable....


SheepStar
 
M

MAX661

Audioholic
When it comes to the last generation of gaming platforms, It easily goes to Xbox. The system is alot more powerful. Some HD games, minimum of 480p, Widescreen and dolby.

The PS2 also has a digital output but not many games are dolby,and there where many issues with the PS2 opertaing on an HDTV! It wouldn't fill the entire screen and the graphics were sub-par. The PS2 had alot of games and fanboys that's about it

Xbox with the HD pack was the way to go, This year it is the Xbox360 and next year will be the PS3... That's just the way it is.
 
N

no man

Audioholic
wow.. i really though microsoft would give out more xbox360`s to stores than what they did.. when the xbox came out they had piles of `em in my local futureshop, this time around 10 (minimum but around that amount) per store. now i gotta wait 2 weeks.. *sigh* o well...
 
A

abboudc

Audioholic Chief
Xbox had the most powerful hardware. PS2 had the most games. Nintendo is the best developer in the console world. All had their advantages.

To say one "won", "hands down" is true. But it was the PS2. Over 70% of the gaming market of the last generation was owned by Sony. The Xbox and Gamecube both had better graphics, but unfortunately for them, the games could have been a LOT better looking, had they not been coded for the PS2, then ported to the Xbox and Gamecube. There were tons of games that didn't look any better on the Xbox than PS2 simply because they were ported in a rush or had the B-team working on the port while the A-team was working on the next big game.

The xbox had some killer innovations, like HD standard, online, and high def. Unfortunately, the only games that made it a must have were Halo and Halo2.

The Gamecube had a bunch of Nintendo first party titles, but little more. Granted, those games were very good, but you had to wait months between big games.

The PS2 had big games every month. It didn't have the best graphics, etc, but it had the one thing that makes a game console a game console -- games. All of the big games minus the Microsoft first party (which outside of Halo were pretty bad) and the Nintendo first party games.

Which is why most people chose the PS2. Playing Grand Theft Auto is better than playing Microsoft NFL Fever, even if fever is in high def. I know, i know, GTA came out for XB too, 9 months later...
 
Sheep

Sheep

Audioholic Warlord
Just some figures from the news, they were talking about sales just before the release of the Xbox360.


PS2 - 90million

Xbox - 22million

Game Cube - 20 million

Xbox and game cube might be backwards, but PS2 clearly trounced in sales.

SheepStar
 
M

MAX661

Audioholic
Sheep said:
Just some figures from the news, they were talking about sales just before the release of the Xbox360.


PS2 - 90million

Xbox - 22million

Game Cube - 20 million

Xbox and game cube might be backwards, but PS2 clearly trounced in sales.

SheepStar
Yes but more sales doesn't mean something is better it just means it is marketed better. If sales was the case than Monster would be the best brand available. There is no denying that the Xbox was the best and most capable console from the last run.
 
Spiffyfast

Spiffyfast

Audioholic General
Well who cares about the old consoles, I know that when I'm playing my 360 that nothing i've had even comes close. Call of Duty 2 in surround sound is amazing.
 
Sheep

Sheep

Audioholic Warlord
Spiffyfast said:
Well who cares about the old consoles, I know that when I'm playing my 360 that nothing i've had even comes close. Call of Duty 2 in surround sound is amazing.
He's BACK!!

Welcome back spiffy, where ya been?

SheepStar
 
M

MAX661

Audioholic
Spiffyfast said:
Well who cares about the old consoles, I know that when I'm playing my 360 that nothing i've had even comes close. Call of Duty 2 in surround sound is amazing.
I agree, Call of Duty is amazing but I found the game to short... It's like one of those things where your having so much fun you just dont realize the time fly by and before you know it, you've been playing for 6 hours straight! Gotta love it though, I liked it so much I am going back through it again... Highly recommended!
 
MasterChief

MasterChief

Junior Audioholic
Yea I just finished playing the first mission for the american campaign in Normandy. Wow Awesome. Reminded me of PSaving Private ryan. Awesome graphics and detail. :D
 
C

Christian M

Enthusiast
Right now, I'd have to say that the ps3 will take it. Right now i have ps2, xbox, and gamecube and each have their strengths.

Halo/Halo2 were the only reason i have and continue to have an xbox, IMO. xbox live and halo saved it and continue to do so. xBox 360 is cool and all with its 3x 3.2ghz PPC chips but they really f'ed up by not going next-gen media. This is where ps3 will pick up the slack and succeed I think - it'll have almost 10x the capacity to put rad content on. But we shall see. I know I'll end up with both but i aint buying a 360 until halo 3 is released. Since i'm a racing dude, nothing touches Gran Turismo. Nope, not rallisport, not forza, and not toca. And tekken rules also... Let the dilemma and spending begin :)

- Christian
 
M

MAX661

Audioholic
See this is where we would differ, While I am dying to get the PS3 there are games on X360 I couldn't do without... DOA4 and the Tenchu series are my absolute favorite games to play which are both Xbox exclusive now that microsoft bought the rights to the Tenchu series and these alone would have made me buy the system.

Either way they are both excellent systems and people should stop argueing constantly.

To me it all falls into 3 categories of people.
1. Sony Fanboys
2. Xbox Fanboys
3. Real Gamers {This category is where I think life is best, no fighting unless it's ingame and having the best of both worlds!}
 
C

Christian M

Enthusiast
max, you said it best. This is why i'll have both systems, again... :)

The only part that sucks is that it's more money out of my pocket. HA!!

But I still stand by my previous statement - for me, there will be no 360 until there is a halo 3. Same goes for ps3 - I wont have one until GT5 and/or the next-gen tekken.

- Christian

jeez, this was a long/interesting night... Fun, but interesting. :D
 
A

abboudc

Audioholic Chief
Christian M said:
for me, there will be no 360 until there is a halo 3.
Me too. Plus, there are some overheating/freezing issues with the first gen hardware. Not that Sony's track record is any better with first gen hardware...
 
hangemhigh

hangemhigh

Audiophyte
how are the graphics

For those of you playing the new xbox360 do you have HD tv are the graphics blow away amazing and if your on a standard tv are the graghics all that much better than the first xbox ?
 
M

MAX661

Audioholic
I have an 60'' SXRD and the graphics look amazing... I wouldn't say blow you away but they are much nicer than the Xbox.

If you dont have an HDTV, then I wouldn't suggest buying a X360 because that is what it was made for and it will most likely only look slightly better than the current Xbox.

These are just my thoughts...
 
Buckeyefan 1

Buckeyefan 1

Audioholic Ninja
Abboudc: The PS2 had big games every month. It didn't have the best graphics, etc, but it had the one thing that makes a game console a game console -- games. All of the big games minus the Microsoft first party (which outside of Halo were pretty bad) and the Nintendo first party games.
That's a good post. Games are what makes a system. Graphics only go so far. If you look back on the history of gaming, you can see the changes taking place, and who took over after so many years as a front runner.

If any of you are old enough to remember the "true" birth of video games, you'll remember a "pong" game that came with a rifle, and you shot a moving dot. The console consisted of two dials - that was it. It didn't sell well. An original version of "pong" came out in the 60's (who knew?). In 1972 Magnavox came out with a system called "Odyssey", but practically went under when Atari sued them for copying a PacMan type game called K.C. Munchkin!.

Next came Atari's $200 2600 "VCS" in 1977. Everyone knows the fame of that system. The reason for it's fame? Space Invaders, Asteroids, Pac Man, Frogger, Millipede, Pitfall - the list goes on. It was only a few years for the competition to start in.

I remember a few people (sold 3 million units) bought Mattel "Intellivision" in 1979. It was a ripoff of the 2600. The graphics were better, but none of the games were original. The keypad controller was horrible. Radio Shack had a clone system called "Tandyvision."

The big hit was in 1982 - the $175 ColecoVision. It has a large percentage of the arcade games, and was heads and tails above everything else. Great controller, too (for its day). It sold 6 million units in three years, primarily because of the "Donkey Kong" game included with the system. Defender, Gorf, Donkey Kong Jr., Carnival, Zaxxon, Centipede, Q-Bert, Frogger, Burgertime, and Galaxian were big hits as well.

Some may even remember a stand alone gaming system called "Vectrex" which also came out in 1982. It had a few games, most notably Minestorm (asteroids), Berzerk, and Pole Position. This was an awesome system, but never really took off. I actually bought one for $99, and it still works.

Also in 1982 the Atari 5200 came out. Great graphics, terrible controllers. Never took off. In 1984 Atari 7800 came out, and was a flop.

In 1985, NES came out and it practically put everyone out of business. IMO, it was the games, the programming, the controllers, and the fun factor. In 1989, Sega Genesis was the big "to do." Great games, and even better graphics. In 1995 - Sony Playstation - a home run. In 1996 - Nintendo 64 - great graphics, but no comparison to Sony's software.

All in all, over the years, it seems those with the best games have won out.
 
J

Jedi2016

Full Audioholic
Buckeyefan 1 said:
All in all, over the years, it seems those with the best games have won out.
Exactly.

That's why I don't own an Xbox, in fact. I'm not much of a shooter fan, and I don't play online.. so there goes Halo and XboxLive. So what's left? Sure, it's got more than that, but is it really worth the cost of a whole new console? No, not really. Not to me, anyway.

Ditto for the 360. There really isn't anything there that's worth the cost of a whole new system for me.

Sony and Nintendo have the games I like. It's as simple as that, it really is. Does that mean I'm not a "real gamer", because I don't want to spend $400+ just to play two or three games?

I agree with Christian M as well, in regards to PS3. Two words: Gran Turismo. To me, that is a game that's worth the cost of the system. Even Nintendo doesn't have that kind of thing, even though the Revolution is on my list for next year.
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top