Somebody needs to hide his phone.
Donald Trump has said that acquiring Greenland is necessary "for purposes of national security and freedom throughout the world."
www.newsweek.com
"Freedom throughout the world depends on US ownership of Greenland?"
Good grief!
The important part is that Greenland is part of the stable democracy Denmark that is member of NATO and EU, so there will be access to minerals and other natural resources. And, of course, for defence purposes.
Greenland, while part of the Danish Kingdom, has extensive home-rule, but there is a big majority for independence from Denmark. So there are risks with a small population and nefarious enemies of democracy.
Climate change is fueling geopolitical competition in the Arctic. An independent Greenland could play an important role in years to come.
www.cfr.org
Now, as for minerals and natural resources Trump should take a look at Ukraine and stop it being occupied by Russia. I saw this op-ed by Marc A. Thiessen, but quite sure of it's validity.
>>>
Donald Trump often says that liberating Iraq without getting its oil resources was one of America’s biggest foreign policy blunders. He has a chance to avoid a similar mistake in Ukraine.
Ukraine is not only the
breadbasket of Europe; it is also a
mineral superpower, with some of the largest reserves of
117 of the 120 most widely used minerals in the world. Of the 50 strategic minerals
identified by the United States as critical to its economy and national security, many of which are quite rare yet key to certain high-value applications,
Ukraine supplies 22.
Ukraine possesses the largest reserves of uranium in Europe; the second-largest reserves of iron ore, titanium and manganese; and the third-largest reserves of shale gas — as well as large deposits of
lithium,
graphite and rare earth metals, according to a
2022 report by the Canadian geopolitical risk-analysis firm SecDev. These minerals are essential to the production of vital goods ranging from airplanes, cellphones and electric vehicles to steel and nuclear power.
The question for the president-elect is: Does he want Russia and China to get that treasure trove of natural resources? Or does he want to develop them with Ukraine to the benefit of the American people?
One of the main reasons Russian President Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine (aside from his
delusional historical fantasies about how Ukrainians and Russians are “one people”) was to seize these natural resources, which are valued at an estimated $26 trillion,
according to SecDev. ...<<<