O
oupee
Enthusiast
It would be great if only those who heard it wrote here. But this is true of all products. Today, they are all experts.
I think in that review it was THD that was measured, not THD+N. If true then it is not an apple to apple comparison.Gene. I like your site, and read it daily. It is true. You may not be old enough to remember Julian Hirsch's test reports in Stereo Review , but his tests were done under rigorous conditions,...continuous power, across the entire bandwidth, both channels operating at the same time, with the amp fully warmed up. Note that 0.0002%, was this limit of his test equipment, at the time--1981. I was not commenting upon the listening quality of the amp, simply, it's power/distortion envelope, which I don't believe has been improved upon. There were several other amps, from the same vintage, I could have used for reference.
It would be great if only those who heard it wrote here. But this is true of all products. Today, they are all experts.
Yea that is true about bass extension on most modern towers. I think they will release a new unit, since this is limited production, to address my concerns.The problem is that most towers have smaller drivers now, and f3s in the 50 Hz range are common even for towers. I suspect designers are now assuming the use of subs is the rule rather than the exception. Three way speakers with larger bass drivers are now very much the exception and generally expensive. Denon should remedy this oversight, and it is an easy fix. Jumpers are the best, and cheapest solution.
I did read Stereoreview as a teen growing up and remember it fondly, especially Julian Hirsch. I would need to see the test conditions and how distortion was measured. The 80s era receivers were pretty bad actually. I had a Pioneer that was speced at .008% THD+N that sounded like poop compared to a good 2CH amp. Today's output devices are faster, and more robust so it's doubtful that the old AV receivers before 2000 era would measure as good or better than today's modern stuff.Gene. I like your site, and read it daily. It is true. You may not be old enough to remember Julian Hirsch's test reports in Stereo Review , but his tests were done under rigorous conditions,...continuous power, across the entire bandwidth, both channels operating at the same time, with the amp fully warmed up. Note that 0.0002%, was this limit of his test equipment, at the time--1981. I was not commenting upon the listening quality of the amp, simply, it's power/distortion envelope, which I don't believe has been improved upon. There were several other amps, from the same vintage, I could have used for reference.
Many subwoofers have speaker level inputs.Great review.
I recently bought this amplifier with Sonus Fabre Olympica Nova V tower speakers.
How would you add/connect a subwoofer to this system as it does not a subwoofer output?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well then using a sub would be out altogether with that sort of concern, eh? Alternatively you could perhaps use the pre-out/main-in connection on some integrated amps to insert a sub.I noticed that but I am afraid that an extra circuit the sound go through it will degrade the performance.
Hopefully the 32Hz the Sonus gets down to will be good enough for my hearing.Well then using a sub would be out altogether with that sort of concern, eh? Alternatively you could perhaps use the pre-out/main-in connection on some integrated amps to insert a sub.
I had 2 with my B&W DM605 S2 but now that I switched to new gear I am thinking of getting one but not sure it’s worth the trouble/moneyDo you already have a subwoofer?
I see.Well, since daisy chain of speaker wire is off the table, you could get a sub and connect the LINE IN to the RECORDER OUT of the Denon BUT the signal would be fixed and require crossover and volume settings on the Sub and volume changes on the amp would have to also be made on the Sub using a remote control or app to match it.
Everyone has a favorite brand and Denon are very, very good.Hard to figure why anyone would buy the Denon over the STR integrated. The latter is big and bulky so maybe that's an issue. I don't remember the price of the Denon but it's close to the STR. The STR has sub outs, room correction, great bass management and 200/channel. I understand the STR products are being discontinued? Any news on this @gene?
Just looked at STR integrated amplifier in my country and it’s 75% more expensive.Hard to figure why anyone would buy the Denon over the STR integrated. The latter is big and bulky so maybe that's an issue. I don't remember the price of the Denon but it's close to the STR. The STR has sub outs, room correction, great bass management and 200/channel. I understand the STR products are being discontinued? Any news on this @gene?
If you are referring to the speaker level inputs, yes that is a possibility as it depends on how it is done. I think reputable manufacturers such as SVS would likely do it in such a way it won't degrade performance but you would have to ask them. When I bought my Rythmik sub, I asked for that feature, not that I would ever use it but just in case, and Rythmik custom designed an OPA based circuit to do it to avoid it to react with the speaker's crossover circuit. I am not promoting that route, just so you know there are options.I noticed that but I am afraid that an extra circuit the sound go through it will degrade the performance.