I think your question is why some of us wish he would provide good reviewers who do legitimate testing his products to review
Without doing so we would never be able to really answer your questions. We could say theoretically it could. But we could never really know until someone would take his products out of the room and provide true outdoor testing.
I like Tom and I like PSA. I spoke to him when I was making decisions on which direction I should go with my theater room on new speakers and subs. But no matter how much I liked him I honestly couldn't feel okay with spending that amount of money without actual independent data telling me exactly what Im getting because that data helps me understand if these speakers and subs are the right fit for what I am trying to achieve out of the room I have to work with.
Which is ultimately why I went with a RBH and Rythmik combination.
Tom has said he doesn't want to submit subs and speakers for review because of issues he has with how some reviewers and consumers getting caught up in chasing certain numbers. That actually is a fair point.
And also that he doesn't need to because his products sell so well he doesn't have enough time to focus on that anyway and it's not necessary to help his sales. That's acceptable as well I'm happy for his success and I respect his honesty about his stance on this position.
BUT for some buyers including myself it matters. I agree with
@Golfx that if he would do independent testing it would get rid of that particular elephant in the room. I just don't think Tom cares enough about independent testing for it to ever happen unfortunately. But I can accept that that is how he feels about this.