BMXTRIX said:
Since it was brought up in the wrong thread and is a good discussion topic...
I've gotta say that I don't mind paying taxes at all. I drive roads, I go (went) to schools, my kid(s) will be, etc. I use public resources and I want them to be good. I want my country to be defended, I want a lot of things and I have no problem paying my fair share.
I agree, and I do not have children. But I do want your children well educated, as one of them might be my doctor one day, and then it will matter very much for my quality of life.
As for paying for defense, I have no problem with that, but I do have a problem with paying for offence, which is what we are doing at the moment. I resent paying for a war that is the result of figments of Bush's imagination. But I will say no more about that as I do not wish to divert the topic too much.
BMXTRIX said:
What I do have problems with:
1. Our area of the country has a poverty level for a family of 4 that approaches $48,000 or more. Some people just do NOT get the disparity of cost of living across this country. The going rate for new single family homes... call it 4 bedroom 2.5 bath is over three quarters of a million dollars! We all need more in this area just to pay for our 'normal' homes. Not mansions, but normal! This is not figured at all into the national tax structure. Where our $75K a year equals someone elses $35K a year.
I think it would be difficult to calculate that into the national tax structure, and any attempt would most likely end up with abuse and with severe errors, making the whole thing more unfair than it is now.
BMXTRIX said:
2. Social Services are a good thing, but they do not have enough policies in place to protect from abuse. There are those who are misfortunate and I am happy to help those out. But, someone who is not trying - who is LAZY deserves the karma they have earned. Not a handout.
Frankly, it would probably be cheaper to simply give everyone a "handout", whether they needed it or not, just not enough of one to live luxuriously. That way, the administrative costs could be kept to a minimum (you would only need to determine that the person is real and alive). The fact that your taxes would be higher to pay for it would be offset by the fact that you would be getting the "handout".
Additionally, right now, the system will cut off people who want to work and can only get a crappy job. Now, if your choice is to work and get less than not working, what would you do? Especially if you have children to feed? If everyone got enough to avoid starvation no matter what, but not enough for luxuries, then people would be motivated to work if they can, because they want more than they have. Even a crappy job would be an addition to one's income.
When I went to college, I remember the financial aid system was set up such that working all summer and saving money meant that one would be given less aid. So working was a stupid thing to do, unless one spent every penny and would then qualify for the same aid as someone who didn't work! (What I decided to do was simply to go to school during the summer months, too, so that I would be able to take more classes.)
BMXTRIX said:
3. The top income level paying more doesn't bug me, as long as they are all paying it and that it applies to their area. A flat tax somehow sclaed for cost of living across the country seems like a good way to do this. Adjustments can be made for the lower level incomes as necessary - but they should be forced to ask for it so they can be held accountable as well. Less deducations, more accountability.
Other people's opinions?
I think the top level income people should be paying the most, and they should not have deductions to weasel out of paying their fair share, which is what often happens now. I say that there should be NO DEDUCTIONS AT ALL.