BMXTRIX said:
Actually I wasn't aware that I did... and you didn't actually quote or specify who you were speaking to. Some people will make comments to get a rise, others will make comments because they have a problem with the facts.
But luckily you live in the United States where our government allows us both to have those rights and our military defends those rights. Please re-read your past posts. Edit as needed.
BMXTRIX said:
What I have seen for a lot of military recruiting is that if you are a young kid with no direction or aim or goals in life... then that is exactly what they are looking for. That's a lot of bottom feeder scraping to put together the military. It doesn't reflect on the actual people, but once again points towards the lousy management and the way things are done quite often in this country.
Please feel free the next time you see a member of our armed forces to tell him or her that they are bottom feeders! I hope you pick a nice military bar to make those kinds of comments.
I take it you have no idea what it takes to become an officer or be accepted to one of the military academies.
BMXTRIX said:
Brian specifically I did not comment on in any way that I think HE would call negative. He did come here to make some comments himself, about himself, which, if someone doesn't want to hear comments back, then perhaps they shouldn't put themselves out there for that in the first place. Yet, he has been good to others on these forums and I think he tries to help others well, and I am unaware of the truth of his situation. Simple as that. No comments were made as to whether he truly is mooching or just in a bad situation. No comment from me either way - so who were you directing your comments to?
I think that speaks for itself.........you should read your previous quotes than maybe edit.
BMXTRIX said:
Yet, anyone in a government job, especially military, should be questioned and commented upon anytime they may be taking part in something unethical or unfair to others. Our military was not founded to "help defend the less fortunate" it was founded to protect our borders from foreign invaders. Heck, by your reasoning you are against Iraq because it neither protects our rights nor helps the less fortunate of our country. In fact, it could very well do just the opposite with how poor war actually is on a national economy like ours.
Now, THAT was inflamatory.
Actually I stated, "This country was founded on the principle that the less fortunate can have another chance and will not be persecuted.
Our military was founded to protect our rights and help defend the less fortunate."
Here is only but a few items that state what our military is for and what our founding fathers wanted:
The Constitution-
The Preamble “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union,
establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
“To provide for calling forth the
Militia to execute the Laws of the Union”
“
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;”
Provides for a military that defends the Constitution.
The Articles of the Confederation –
Article III. The said States hereby severally enter into a firm league of friendship with each other, for their common defense, the security of their liberties, and their mutual and general welfare, binding themselves to assist each other, against all force offered to, or attacks made upon them, or any of them, on account of religion, sovereignty, trade, or any other pretense whatever.
Article IV. The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different States in this Union, the free inhabitants of each of these States shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several States
Binds the States (US government) to defend liberties that includes religion and “any other pretense whatever”.
Oath of Enlisted Military –
"I, _____, do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."
They swear they will obey orders. Not question them.
All of that and more boils down to the US military will provide security and defense of this country and it's laws. Which is specifically spelled out that it defends liberties of religion and any other pretense (falsehood) from foreign and domestic threats. Would that not be defending the "less fortunate"? There are many instances in national and state law that specifically states what the military was founded for and how it will be used.
We could go on further with our agreements with the United Nations, NATO and other foreign policies to further state how the defense of others is spelled out.
We could also look at how our military was deployed in the past that set the presedence for todays use of the military.
You should be glad our country does not demand mandatory military service like many other countries.