On Trump

[3db]

He is suing the government for $15 billion because his ego was hurt.

What surprises me the most of Trump's reign (not to be confused with tenure or term) is that ahole is still alive and that nobody has bumped him off.

 

[mtrycrafts]

What surprises me the most of Trump's reign (not to be confused with tenure or term) is that ahole is still alive and that nobody has bumped him off.

There were two attempts.

 

[mtrycrafts]

I saw this interesting link when I opened my Firefox browser window. I'm not sure how accurate this report is but it does fall in the realm of an idiotic, narcissistic, AHOLE that Trump is.

Trump

Just saw this:
Trump’s power to sue US is challenged in $10 billion IRS case

 

[3db]

Just saw this:
Trump’s power to sue US is challenged in $10 billion IRS case

Sweet Jeezus!!! That's going to be complicated. The position of POTUS should never have the power to overrule the judicial system. The fact that POTUS can do that can easily turn the US into a dictatorship. Another constitutional fix that is desperately required.

 

[Mikado463]

You mean the present system is not working?

Everything and everybody can always improve ............

 

[lovinthehd]

Yes, what exactly was so wrong with the old system where the extension of ID requirements are necessary? We talking just ID or this stupid new voter act with the handmaiden aspect for women voters?

 

[pewternhrata]

So you didn't answer my question, is there credible evidence of voter fraud that warrants this change?
And, all of a sudden people don't trust the system?

Credible evidence is beside the point. Why not strengthen the voting integrity?
People all of a sudden don't trust? Not exactly however, the past 10+ yrs have consisted of nothing but 'rigged' elections. Again why not strengthen the integrity of the voting system to better protect our right to, well, vote. Me myself would prefer better safe guards be put into place.

 

[pewternhrata]

Yes, what exactly was so wrong with the old system where the extension of ID requirements are necessary? We talking just ID or this stupid new voter act with the handmaiden aspect for women voters?

Don't play dumb. A simple birth certificate, that is all. If anyone cannot figure that out, I do not trust them voting in the 1st place. Were talking about a birth certificate. Not sure what hole other ppl live in, but its a pretty significant document to misplace. Its that simple.

 

[dlaloum]

He is suing the government for $15 billion because his ego was hurt.

No he is suing the government for $15B because he owns the various tiers who have to defend on behalf of the government, and can therefore well nigh guarantee a win....

He is simply lining his pockets with Taxpayer money - and this is one of the more egregious examples.

If the US checks and balances aren't forced into total collapse by Trump, I expect there may well be court cases clawing back billions from the Trump family after they are no longer in office.

 

[mtrycrafts]

Yes, what exactly was so wrong with the old system where the extension of ID requirements are necessary? We talking just ID or this stupid new voter act with the handmaiden aspect for women voters?

Both.

 

[lovinthehd]

Both.

In both cases generated by maga to feed on FUD....

 

[mtrycrafts]

Everything and everybody can always improve ............

At what cost? To what certainty? Is that 3rd or 4th % decimal place, or even less, that critical? And the guilty is already being punished and some serve time.

 

[mtrycrafts]

Credible evidence is beside the point. Why not strengthen the voting integrity?
People all of a sudden don't trust? Not exactly however, the past 10+ yrs have consisted of nothing but 'rigged' elections. Again why not strengthen the integrity of the voting system to better protect our right to, well, vote. Me myself would prefer better safe guards be put into place.

How is evidence beside the point? You mean it is not strong right now with extremely small fractional abuse? You really want 100% or just disenfranchise the system as what is being thought.
How is you rights not protected? We already have safeguards and it works extremely well. You will never get 100%. One only has to look at who is abusing the system, like husbands of a dead voter, or children of one.
You want that last 6 voter out of 5 million stopped? Really?

 

[lovinthehd]

At what cost? To what certainty? Is that 3rd or 4th % decimal place, or even less, that critical? And the guilty is already being punished and some serve time.

Reminds of me of SINAD worshipping.

 

[mtrycrafts]

Credible evidence is beside the point. Why not strengthen the voting integrity?
People all of a sudden don't trust? Not exactly however, the past 10+ yrs have consisted of nothing but 'rigged' elections. Again why not strengthen the integrity of the voting system to better protect our right to, well, vote. Me myself would prefer better safe guards be put into place.

Rigged election? Of course you have the evidence, right?

 

[lovinthehd]

Rigged election? Of course you have the evidence, right?

Sure he does, like the rest of maga

 

[mtrycrafts]

Sure he does, like the rest of maga

What was I thinking. Need to have my head examined. Maybe there is an opening tomorrow at my doctor.

 

[pewternhrata]

How is evidence beside the point? You mean it is not strong right now with extremely small fractional abuse? You really want 100% or just disenfranchise the system as what is being thought.
How is you rights not protected? We already have safeguards and it works extremely well. You will never get 100%. One only has to look at who is abusing the system, like husbands of a dead voter, or children of one.
You want that last 6 voter out of 5 million stopped? Really?

I apologize, I don't understand your response. Husbands of a dead voter, go ask the Clinton's i suppose, its not my point. Its irrelevant. I don't understand how voter laws can been seen as a bad thing.

 

[lovinthehd]

I apologize, I don't understand your response. Husbands of a dead voter, go ask the Clinton's i suppose, its not my point. Its irrelevant. I don't understand how voter laws can been seen as a bad thing.

We're supposed to understand this response?

 

[mtrycrafts]

I apologize, I don't understand your response. Husbands of a dead voter, go ask the Clinton's i suppose, its not my point. Its irrelevant. I don't understand how voter laws can been seen as a bad thing.

We already have voter laws. Felony and 5 years. And of course, IDs and proof of citizenship if needed When registering.
After that, it is just BS.

Oh, I guess you didn't read about family members voting or rather using a deceased family member's ballot. And no, not Clinton but in the 2024 election by, you guessed it, republicans.
Oh, a hole county had to redo voting because of some republicans falsely collecting and abusing ballots.