TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Audioholic Jedi
Why would they try to modify a virus only to make it worse? I'd think they want to make it less potent? Also, I'm weary of the "herd immunity" phrase since there were people initially saying that. Was anyone really gonna infect more people first to reduce the virus? Doesn't seem to be in the govts interest to kill more people first.
First Herd immunity is a natural event and happens as more are exposed, by contact, immunization and to a large extent both. You modify a virus to make it worse as a development of a weapon of war.
 
GO-NAD!

GO-NAD!

Audioholic Warlord
First Herd immunity is a natural event and happens as more are exposed, by contact, immunization and to a large extent both. You modify a virus to make it worse as a development of a weapon of war.
According to the article I linked, weaponizing a virus is not the primary reason for GOF. The fear is that legitimate gain of function efforts could lead to bad actors hijacking such work in order to make a weapon.
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Audioholic Jedi
According to the article I linked, weaponizing a virus is not the primary reason for GOF. The fear is that legitimate gain of function efforts could lead to bad actors hijacking such work in order to make a weapon.
Yes, gain of function is done to predict what viruses could do, then try and get ahead of the curve so to speak. Count me highly skeptical about that, and I'm not alone. I think the risks far outweigh any possible benefit. An you can bet the virus will still mutate in a way the researchers never thought of!
 
Last edited:
M

mtrot

Senior Audioholic
According to the article I linked, weaponizing a virus is not the primary reason for GOF. The fear is that legitimate gain of function efforts could lead to bad actors hijacking such work in order to make a weapon.
Reminds me of the deadly virus in Mission Impossible 2

In Mission: Impossible 2, the deadly biological weapon is a genetically modified synthetic virus named Chimera.

I guess I can maybe see such a possibility as providing some justification for gain of function research as a way to stay ahead of possible bad actors/terrorists who might pay big money to some guru to come up with a viral weapon with which they can threaten nations. Or even kidnap such a scientist and force him or her to develop the virus.
 
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Warlord
First Herd immunity is a natural event and happens as more are exposed, by contact, immunization and to a large extent both. You modify a virus to make it worse as a development of a weapon of war.
It isn't a realistic path for human beings though as you have to spread it around more to reach immunity. "Herd Immunity" almost sounds like cattle LOL. Then there's liability by govt for either doing nothing or letting a certain amount of people die first for the remainder to survive.
 
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Warlord
I remember when covid first started and that woman said look at how terrible my hair looks! I need a perm! Or that guy who was crying cause he couldn't go to the movie theater. Or the guy crying cause he couldn't get paint. Use your curling iron, use the Internet, and the painting can wait. Or the guy wondering why he couldn't go to Disney World? One of those moments I was embarrassed to be an American. A bunch of spoiled babies. :rolleyes:
 
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Warlord
There's people out there displaced due to the Iran war. People without heat and running water. Last thing I needed to hear was people in a dilemma over not being able to go to their hair stylist. :rolleyes:
 
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Warlord
I remember when Anderson Cooper had that guest on who was the mayor in Nevada. Cooper said it was like a "petry dish" sending the casino workers back. Then I think he asked if she was gonna be on the front lines because she's the decision maker? She said something about having to get home to her family. I remember thinking if I were her boss she's gonna be a greeter and a waitress handing out free drinks to customers. I.dont care if you are in.the 60s. Lead by example lol.

Glen Beck was one of the best. He said he was willing to die to keep the economy open.

Rand might be good in building a covid investigation committee, but not so good in his reasoning like kids have social deficits since covid. Or that he was the first senator to get covid. Or when he said if you are negative after a covid test, celebrate by going out to a restaurant. I thought WTF.

What a mess. I'm glad that's over with.
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top