TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Audioholic Jedi
Why would they try to modify a virus only to make it worse? I'd think they want to make it less potent? Also, I'm weary of the "herd immunity" phrase since there were people initially saying that. Was anyone really gonna infect more people first to reduce the virus? Doesn't seem to be in the govts interest to kill more people first.
First Herd immunity is a natural event and happens as more are exposed, by contact, immunization and to a large extent both. You modify a virus to make it worse as a development of a weapon of war.
 
GO-NAD!

GO-NAD!

Audioholic Warlord
First Herd immunity is a natural event and happens as more are exposed, by contact, immunization and to a large extent both. You modify a virus to make it worse as a development of a weapon of war.
According to the article I linked, weaponizing a virus is not the primary reason for GOF. The fear is that legitimate gain of function efforts could lead to bad actors hijacking such work in order to make a weapon.
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Audioholic Jedi
According to the article I linked, weaponizing a virus is not the primary reason for GOF. The fear is that legitimate gain of function efforts could lead to bad actors hijacking such work in order to make a weapon.
Yes, gain of function is done to predict what viruses could do, the try and get ahead of the curve so to speak. Count me highly skeptical about that, and I'm not alone. I think the risks far outweigh any possible benefit. An you can bet the virus will still mutate in a way the researchers never thought of!
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top