I agree it should go back up to 120. I’ll elaborate for the OP so this small clarification is aimed at him. The only way he’s “killing” bass is not in the subwoofer channel, and I think the verbiage is a little confusing and should be expanded a little, since it’s a small frequency range that might not get much content based on the individual soundtrack, and is only related to .1, and not any bass below XO points.
What the subwoofer is responsible for playing back is twofold. One, it plays all of the redirected bass below the XO points of the other speakers. Two, it plays the .1 LFE channel that’s encoded into movies. (This specific channel carries content from 1-120hz and the LPF just sets the ceiling of that content.)
IE 5.1, 7.1, 7.1.4 etc. while they both are played by the subwoofer, they’re are NOT related. Music doesn’t have a .1 in it, only movies do.
The only time imo that it makes sense to lower the LPF of LFE is if there’s an issue with localization of the subwoofer.
Seems this is a movie centric system, but I thought some clearing of the water might be useful, even at the risk of being pedantic lol.
I also mentioned lowering the heights XO to 100hz. While I still that’s true, I failed to mention what you and
@lovinthehd did about the lack of EQ between 100 and 200hz. Oopsies!
@PENG might have the right idea in trying 150hz. And as much as I’d love to try Dirac, I think the denon will be a much better solution. Although I’ve seen a few people that love their RZ50’s.
I know you may not have any concept of this living in the great state of Texas. But it’s currently -7F with 22mph winds, and a wind chill factor between -30 and -40. I think I’ll com stay with you. Until about may!