Oh boy, this should be fun.
Where to start, where to start?
Let's take this "fictitious aliases" BS head on to start with. I purchased the Outlaw under my legal name. For years prior to that purchase I have maintained gmail accounts and a Facebook account under various noms de guerre. A practice by the way which has everything to do with a crazy ex-wife and absolutely nothing to do with Outlaw's continuing breech of their warranty contract.
Anyone here want's to know my real name, just ask.
That said, various business related websites identify Outlaw's Jonathan Lederman as Outlaw's Managing Partner and a Jim Michelson as their Technical Support Manager. The curious thing about this particular point, is that the guy I spoke to in tech support at Outlaw (after he took over for the first guy named Ben), was a guy who identified himself as Jim Gordon (like the cop in Batman), on all of the official messages he sent me during my hellish dealings with the guy over the course of several days. Now, I'm not saying there is no "Jim Gordon" at Outlaw, but I've found not a single scrap of evidence anywhere on the internet to suggest that there is. Further, this guy, let's just call him "Jim" is the same guy who refused me service at Outlaw, banned me from communicating with them, and screamed, swore, and hung up on me the one time I managed to get him on the phone. He also sent me a slew of insulting and hostile messages from Outlaw's ticketing system and or to my gmail account after this initial breech. He and a guy who identified himself as the managing partner, opted to tag team me via no-reply email to threaten my partner and I with lawsuits if she didn't remove the negative review she had posted on Google. I've described all of this is some detail in this thread and elsewhere online in reviews I've posted.
What I saw no reason, until now, to mention was the fact that this "Jim" guy identified himself as Outlaw's "technical support manager." Now, obviously I have no way of knowing for certain. Maybe Outlaw's staff does include TWO tech support managers both named Jim, but honestly, I suspect they don't. The only reason any of this BS is relevant is because this "Jim" guy keeps aggressively coming at me because my gmail acct and my facebook acct were never set up in my legal name to begin with. Clearly this is a sticking point for "Jim." & frankly I suspect that Outlaw is making hay about me doing something that is in no way a violation of any laws I am aware of. (Rules maybe, but not laws, and besides, none of these cites are my JOB sites.)
I have copies of every conversation I've had with Outlaw on this subject except for the single phone call where this "Jim" guy got abusive within seconds of the start of our conversation. I have copies of everything I've sent them or posted to various sites. Including the original review my partner posted on Google, so obviously, she was aware of this situation real time as it deteriorated.
Finally, I would also like to point out that after I told Outlaw that I would not ask my partner to remove her posted review (on 3/22/19 at 2:31pm. Both date and time are on my copies of the receipt.) Outlaw has still NOT returned any of my calls, responded to any of my Tweets or Facebook messages. & their one response to my reply to them on the 22nd is so sad and embarrassing (for them) that if they continue to hassle me about this, I will no doubt end up posting it here as well.
What kind of company spends weeks casting accusations and insults at a customer who has a product that is still under warranty, rather than simply dealing with the issue? What is their rational for refusing to honor the terms of this warranty?
In my opinion the kind of company that engages in this type of behavior is the worst kind of company, and the extent to which their claims of previously having provided "outstanding customer service" in no way absolves them of their wretched behavior in this particular case.
Outlaw knows full well the various means by which they could contact me at any time of the day or night. They chose not to do so, in my opinion, because they are refusing to honor their warranty. But I will be curious to hear what kind of lame BS excuses they might get around to posting to this forum.
I have zero stake, or reason, for covering my own butt in this situation. Clearly, Outlaw feels that they need to cover their own. Maybe they should try FIXING things with me?