markw said:
"I mean, seriously guy, I'm a home audio newbie, but i'm not a complete idiot."
Be aware that the two terms are not mutually exclusive.
Yes, you DID imply that you were going to hook them together.
You've gotten quite a few responses trying to help you. It's not our fault that you either didn't present the problem clearly in the first place or you are too dense to understand what's being said.
Now, four pages into replys you want to get snotty?
Somehow I think your run of decent answers is about at an end.
If you look at rock&roll's reply.. I do believe he was the *** in this equation.
Now, considering that out of 4 pages I got three decent replies.. I think it's probably ok that my "run of decent answers is about at an end" .. I mean, your replies was completely worthless.
post #3 : Worthless
Post #4 : marginally helpful woohoo! 1..
Post #5 : insightful 2...
Post #6 : repetetive of #5, i.e. worthless
Post #7 : pretty irrelevant
Post #8 : my own
post #9 : pointless.
Post #10 : might have been helpful if I knew what the device was called
11 : my own post
12 : worthless
13 : Not helpful to my question, and filled with unrelated stuff like his tangent about his speakers
14 : He didn't even read what I said, thinking I said 200watts per channel.
15 : My own
16 : points to a post that won't help anyhow. I don't want to spend $$$ on speakers when I ALREADY HAVE MORE SPEAKERS than I need.
17 : pointless. Refers me to klipsch which I'm not going to buy.. $1000 for a $150 receiver? Again, it's also telling me "buy more speakers"
18 : might have been Somewhat helpful, but not really - also makes a point
that is unrelated to the analogies that I didn't start.
19 : unrelated.
20 : Unrelated as well. - I don't care about store return policies, I'M NOT BUYING NEW SPEAKERS. I'm TRYING TO MAKE THE SPEAKERS I HAVE WORK ON MY RECEIVER!
21 : my own post
22 : something I knew already. No ****, sherlock. My speakers suck, which is why I want to ADD MORE SPEAKERS THAT I ALREADY HAVE.
23 : my own post
24 : you recommend athena ($800), klipsch ($1000), for a $150 receiver
25 : pointless. - see #22
26 : I didn't start the car analogies, I just rolled with them. Pointless, and also not really a valid analogy
27 : stupid, stupid, stupid. So, I'm supposed to buy an overpriced, stereo with small speakers, rather than just make my EXISTING SPEAKERS WORK?
28 : another worthless car analogy, but then he actually makes a good point. I'm not like you people. I'm not going to spend $1,000+ on speakers and receivers.
29: But they are still $800 for the ones that "match" the recommended 94dB sensitivity level, and this is still "buy more speakers" rather than "this is how you get the speakers you have to work"
30 : my post
31 : points me to cerwin vega. Which is "Buy more speakers"
32 : ahole in training
33 : Might be onto something. But still sounds like "buy more speakers"
34 : Sounds like buy more speakers : then a self ego stroke "I've got this great thing, I'm better than you"
35 : my post telling rock&roll to stuff it
36 : your dumb post
37 : this reply
38 : Your clever belief that I'm going to get banned. You must be a mod, right?
wow.. it wasn't even two helpful posts.
half of the posts were "buy new speakers"