
AcuDefTechGuy
Audioholic Jedi
And that is exactly what I want - RED.on my monitor they are red. Since I'm into photography as a hobby my monitor is color calibrated and yep those pretty Phil3's are RED.
And that is exactly what I want - RED.on my monitor they are red. Since I'm into photography as a hobby my monitor is color calibrated and yep those pretty Phil3's are RED.
They really look good, but as we know using flash is somewhat harsh and ad a bluish reflection and lightens pics too.And that is exactly what I want - RED.![]()
Awesome review - thank you. However, I hate you now because now I'm back to wanting a pair for myself. LOL! J/K - no hate here. Thanks for the review sir!
Excellent review, Bob!
I do like the Martin Logans. The Philharmonics are in another league though. The sound is somewhat similar to the electrostatic sound. If you like electrostatics then you will love the Phillys.Soo.... Philharmonic 2s, or Martin Logan Vistas? They're the same price. I do love that electrostatic sound, though...
Several differences.Soo.... Philharmonic 2s, or Martin Logan Vistas? They're the same price. I do love that electrostatic sound, though...
Are there any reviews of the ML's with measurements? I couldn't find any. I haven't had the pleasure of hearing them, although they certainly seem interesting. Obviously the best crossover is no crossover, which gives the ML's an advantage above the woofer-panel crossover point, which I'm guessing is in the 250-300 Hz range. On the other hand, they will still need baffle step compensation, and I don't know how well that is implemented in this design. My best guess is that the Phil's go lower (I'm pretty sure of that), and will have a wider sweet spot. But in a properly seated postition, all bets are off. I would love to hear them in my living room.Several differences.
1. The Martin Logan are IMO inaccurate speakers in terms of FR on-axis & off-axis. The Philharmonic speakers are accurate.
2. The ML are IMO probably "worth" $1K after you factor in mark up, advertisement, etc. The Philharmonic 2 are IMO worth $3K with little mark up, advertisement, etc.
"Obvious" choice IMO are the Philharmonic 2.![]()
I was surprised to see them in big box Futureshop last year going for C$1,499.99 each. I A/B compared them a couple of times with the RC70 and to me there was no comparison. The Energy's sounded way better. I tried to focus on only mids and highs each time. In a different listening environment the results will most likely be different but I wasn't sure if they would sound different enough for me to say they were worth the price. FS seems to carry only the lower end ML speaker now and I guess I know the reason.2. The ML are IMO probably "worth" $1K after you factor in mark up, advertisement, etc. The Philharmonic 2 are IMO worth $3K with little mark up, advertisement, etc.
"Obvious" choice IMO are the Philharmonic 2.![]()
ADTG has this thread talking about some of Olive's blogs with some graphs of Vistas I think. Not sure if that's what you were looking for but it's a good thread anyway.Are there any reviews of the ML's with measurements?
Hummmmm.....last I heard about 6 weeks give or take, depending whether you want 1/2s or the custom cabinet 3s. Dennis would be the contact on that one.Well, out of curiosity, what's the wait like for getting a pair of Philharmonic 2's, if I were to go that route?
MartinLogan Aerius loudspeaker Measurements part 2 | Stereophile.comAre there any reviews of the ML's with measurements? I couldn't find any. I haven't had the pleasure of hearing them, although they certainly seem interesting. Obviously the best crossover is no crossover, which gives the ML's an advantage above the woofer-panel crossover point, which I'm guessing is in the 250-300 Hz range. On the other hand, they will still need baffle step compensation, and I don't know how well that is implemented in this design. My best guess is that the Phil's go lower (I'm pretty sure of that), and will have a wider sweet spot. But in a properly seated postition, all bets are off. I would love to hear them in my living room.
I've auditioned the ML Vantage. They sound pretty good. But not as good as the BP7001SC IMO.I was surprised to see them in big box Futureshop last year going for C$1,499.99 each. I A/B compared them a couple of times with the RC70 and to me there was no comparison. The Energy's sounded way better. I tried to focus on only mids and highs each time. In a different listening environment the results will most likely be different but I wasn't sure if they would sound different enough for me to say they were worth the price. FS seems to carry only the lower end ML speaker now and I guess I know the reason.
Very exciting.HoWeVeR, I am mostly facetious at the least...........because I am picking my sets up in 3 hours..................!!!