Yes! "Exactly"!
Consistency in officiating is so important. In the past, I was a swimming official, stroke & turn judge, starter, and referee. I did 10 years of that, at a kids' summer swim league, local swimming meets both winter & summer at a bottom rung of USA Swimming, and Junior Olympics. Earlier, in college, I earned some extra pocket money officiating at the university's intramural basketball league. Both sports offered excellent training for officials. I learned exactly what to look for, and how to be consistent in making calls.
I don't know football rules very well, but I've always wondered why NFL officials have such a hard time. 1) NFL players are fast and very good. 2) NFL has TV and instant replay. The sports I did never had that. 3) NFL rules are so complex that it becomes difficult for officials to see infractions vs. good plays.
For example: Imagine an official covering a pass reception at the side line. How can that official see the receiver's hands as he catches the ball, while he also watches his feet? Was one foot in bounds? And, was it in bounds before or after making the catch? All while the official is running at full speed. I the NFL could simplify that rule. Ignore where the feet go. Judge out of bounds by where the ball is, like in basketball or soccer. And use the same definition for out-of-bounds as is done for crossing the goal line. Different rules for different lines only causes confusion.
Why not use technology? Put a chip in the ball and use side line and goal line detectors to tell if the ball crossed the line. It's not exactly rocket science.
The present rule defining what constitutes a completed pass is hopeless. For goodness sake, clarify the term 'a football move'. Do all officials use the same criteria for that? Better yet, create a new rule, an easily understood and enforced rule. It will be easy if the team owners are kept out of the process.