mtrycrafts Seriously, I have no life. Aug 19, 2004 23,546 0 113 May 31, 2019 #621 GO-NAD! said: That was so funny, I almost spit my coffee out! It was mental acrobatics that linked the two. https://www.washingtonpost.com/hist...s-told-post-hes-wrong/?utm_term=.b6476efcd507 Click to expand... Only 7 historians? Oh wait we have much more prosecutors than real historians.
GO-NAD! said: That was so funny, I almost spit my coffee out! It was mental acrobatics that linked the two. https://www.washingtonpost.com/hist...s-told-post-hes-wrong/?utm_term=.b6476efcd507 Click to expand... Only 7 historians? Oh wait we have much more prosecutors than real historians.
Dale Doback Junior Audioholic Aug 14, 2017 54 0 8 65 May 31, 2019 #622 highfigh said: Great LP and movie. Click to expand... Never was a big fan of Talking Heads. I was a fan of Tom Tom Club however.
highfigh said: Great LP and movie. Click to expand... Never was a big fan of Talking Heads. I was a fan of Tom Tom Club however.
mtrycrafts Seriously, I have no life. Aug 19, 2004 23,546 0 113 May 31, 2019 #623 highfigh said: The DOJ was used as a weapon and Mueller didn't think it was worth pressing charges. Do you really want a police state? . Click to expand... Is that what he said? I heard something completely different. Interesting
highfigh said: The DOJ was used as a weapon and Mueller didn't think it was worth pressing charges. Do you really want a police state? . Click to expand... Is that what he said? I heard something completely different. Interesting
mtrycrafts Seriously, I have no life. Aug 19, 2004 23,546 0 113 May 31, 2019 #624 highfigh said: They impeached Clinton because he lied. Click to expand... So a lie is more of a crime than obstruction of justice?
highfigh said: They impeached Clinton because he lied. Click to expand... So a lie is more of a crime than obstruction of justice?
H highfigh Seriously, I have no life. Sep 14, 2008 24,207 0 113 May 31, 2019 #625 mtrycrafts said: So a lie is more of a crime than obstruction of justice? Click to expand... Depends on the lie. It's usually the same, if the FBI is concerned and even in cases where someone doesn't remember exactly what happened, the FBI usually wins. They're politicians- lying is what they do.
mtrycrafts said: So a lie is more of a crime than obstruction of justice? Click to expand... Depends on the lie. It's usually the same, if the FBI is concerned and even in cases where someone doesn't remember exactly what happened, the FBI usually wins. They're politicians- lying is what they do.
T TankTop5 Audioholic Samurai Jan 25, 2019 2,293 0 48 49 Jun 1, 2019 #626 mtrycrafts said: So a lie is more of a crime than obstruction of justice? Click to expand... Clinton lies under oath which is a felony, although it was during a witch hunt of a trial. Mueller said behind closed doors to Barr that the evidence of obstruction absent OLC rules still would not warrant criminal charges against the President. There you have it, from the horses mouth, but you will still continue to spin it in your heads. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mtrycrafts said: So a lie is more of a crime than obstruction of justice? Click to expand... Clinton lies under oath which is a felony, although it was during a witch hunt of a trial. Mueller said behind closed doors to Barr that the evidence of obstruction absent OLC rules still would not warrant criminal charges against the President. There you have it, from the horses mouth, but you will still continue to spin it in your heads. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Trell Audioholic Spartan Dec 12, 2018 7,073 0 63 ::1 Jun 1, 2019 #627 TankTop5 said: Clinton lies under oath which is a felony, although it was during a witch hunt of a trial. Mueller said behind closed doors to Barr that the evidence of obstruction absent OLC rules still would not warrant criminal charges against the President. [my emphasis] There you have it, from the horses mouth, but you will still continue to spin it in your heads. Click to expand... That clearly is not the case as the Mueller report and his public statement shows, and you are just putting forth a bald-faced lie misrepresentation. Edit: I apologize for suggesting that @TankTop5 lied, after he complained in a reply to this post, so misrepresentation will have to do instead. Last edited: Jun 1, 2019 Reactions: TheWarrior and lovinthehd
TankTop5 said: Clinton lies under oath which is a felony, although it was during a witch hunt of a trial. Mueller said behind closed doors to Barr that the evidence of obstruction absent OLC rules still would not warrant criminal charges against the President. [my emphasis] There you have it, from the horses mouth, but you will still continue to spin it in your heads. Click to expand... That clearly is not the case as the Mueller report and his public statement shows, and you are just putting forth a bald-faced lie misrepresentation. Edit: I apologize for suggesting that @TankTop5 lied, after he complained in a reply to this post, so misrepresentation will have to do instead.
T TankTop5 Audioholic Samurai Jan 25, 2019 2,293 0 48 49 Jun 1, 2019 #628 Trell said: That clearly is not the case as the Mueller report and his public statement shows, and you are just putting forth a bald-faced lie. Click to expand... From the Daily Beast: “Mueller’s statement was in contrast to Attorney General William Barr’s previous comments about the DOJ policy in question, an opinion from the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC). When Barr gave a press conference before the public release of Mueller’s report, he said he asked Mueller multiple times if the special counsel would have charged Trump absent that OLC opinion. “[H]e made it very clear several times that that was not his position,” Barr said at the time. “He was not saying that but for the OLC opinion, he would have found a crime. He made it clear that he had not made the determination that there was a crime.”” Please don’t call me a liar again! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Trell said: That clearly is not the case as the Mueller report and his public statement shows, and you are just putting forth a bald-faced lie. Click to expand... From the Daily Beast: “Mueller’s statement was in contrast to Attorney General William Barr’s previous comments about the DOJ policy in question, an opinion from the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC). When Barr gave a press conference before the public release of Mueller’s report, he said he asked Mueller multiple times if the special counsel would have charged Trump absent that OLC opinion. “[H]e made it very clear several times that that was not his position,” Barr said at the time. “He was not saying that but for the OLC opinion, he would have found a crime. He made it clear that he had not made the determination that there was a crime.”” Please don’t call me a liar again! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
E <eargiant Senior Audioholic May 3, 2016 525 0 43 Jun 1, 2019 #629 TankTop5 said: From the Daily Beast: “Mueller’s statement was in contrast to Attorney General William Barr’s previous comments about the DOJ policy in question, an opinion from the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC). When Barr gave a press conference before the public release of Mueller’s report, he said he asked Mueller multiple times if the special counsel would have charged Trump absent that OLC opinion. “[H]e made it very clear several times that that was not his position,” Barr said at the time. “He was not saying that but for the OLC opinion, he would have found a crime. He made it clear that he had not made the determination that there was a crime.”” Please don’t call me a liar again! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Click to expand... You can't leave out the rest of the article linked below. What Barr says that Mueller said is quite contrary to what Mueller's 400 page Report says and what Mueller himself said in front of the cameras a few days ago. https://www.thedailybeast.com/robert-mueller-announces-resignation-from-justice-department Last edited: Jun 1, 2019 Reactions: mtrycrafts and Trell
TankTop5 said: From the Daily Beast: “Mueller’s statement was in contrast to Attorney General William Barr’s previous comments about the DOJ policy in question, an opinion from the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC). When Barr gave a press conference before the public release of Mueller’s report, he said he asked Mueller multiple times if the special counsel would have charged Trump absent that OLC opinion. “[H]e made it very clear several times that that was not his position,” Barr said at the time. “He was not saying that but for the OLC opinion, he would have found a crime. He made it clear that he had not made the determination that there was a crime.”” Please don’t call me a liar again! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Click to expand... You can't leave out the rest of the article linked below. What Barr says that Mueller said is quite contrary to what Mueller's 400 page Report says and what Mueller himself said in front of the cameras a few days ago. https://www.thedailybeast.com/robert-mueller-announces-resignation-from-justice-department
Trell Audioholic Spartan Dec 12, 2018 7,073 0 63 ::1 Jun 1, 2019 #630 TankTop5 said: From the Daily Beast: “Mueller’s statement was in contrast to Attorney General William Barr’s previous comments about the DOJ policy in question, an opinion from the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC). When Barr gave a press conference before the public release of Mueller’s report, he said he asked Mueller multiple times if the special counsel would have charged Trump absent that OLC opinion. “[H]e made it very clear several times that that was not his position,” Barr said at the time. “He was not saying that but for the OLC opinion, he would have found a crime. He made it clear that he had not made the determination that there was a crime.”” Please don’t call me a liar again! Click to expand... Your quote from the Daily Beast, that @<eargiant so kindly provided a link to: Mueller: My Hands Were Tied on Charging Trump, does not support your original statement of what Barr himself said what Mueller had said: TankTop5 said: Mueller said behind closed doors to Barr that the evidence of obstruction absent OLC rules still would not warrant criminal charges against the President. Click to expand... I apologize for suggesting that you where lying, and quite simply say that you misrepresented what Barr himself had said what Muller had said.
TankTop5 said: From the Daily Beast: “Mueller’s statement was in contrast to Attorney General William Barr’s previous comments about the DOJ policy in question, an opinion from the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC). When Barr gave a press conference before the public release of Mueller’s report, he said he asked Mueller multiple times if the special counsel would have charged Trump absent that OLC opinion. “[H]e made it very clear several times that that was not his position,” Barr said at the time. “He was not saying that but for the OLC opinion, he would have found a crime. He made it clear that he had not made the determination that there was a crime.”” Please don’t call me a liar again! Click to expand... Your quote from the Daily Beast, that @<eargiant so kindly provided a link to: Mueller: My Hands Were Tied on Charging Trump, does not support your original statement of what Barr himself said what Mueller had said: TankTop5 said: Mueller said behind closed doors to Barr that the evidence of obstruction absent OLC rules still would not warrant criminal charges against the President. Click to expand... I apologize for suggesting that you where lying, and quite simply say that you misrepresented what Barr himself had said what Muller had said.
mtrycrafts Seriously, I have no life. Aug 19, 2004 23,546 0 113 Jun 1, 2019 #631 TankTop5 said: Clinton lies under oath which is a felony, although it was during a witch hunt of a trial. Mueller said behind closed doors to Barr that the evidence of obstruction absent OLC rules still would not warrant criminal charges against the President. There you have it, from the horses mouth, but you will still continue to spin it in your heads. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Click to expand... What is your source of that allegation of behind closed doors? Were you there? Do you have a credible transcript of that allegation? Reactions: lovinthehd
TankTop5 said: Clinton lies under oath which is a felony, although it was during a witch hunt of a trial. Mueller said behind closed doors to Barr that the evidence of obstruction absent OLC rules still would not warrant criminal charges against the President. There you have it, from the horses mouth, but you will still continue to spin it in your heads. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Click to expand... What is your source of that allegation of behind closed doors? Were you there? Do you have a credible transcript of that allegation?
lovinthehd Audioholic Jedi Sep 11, 2012 44,861 0 113 Oakridge, OR Jun 1, 2019 #632 Dale Doback said: Wow, Libtards are losing it. Click to expand... Oh the conservaturds are way ahead on this score....
Dale Doback said: Wow, Libtards are losing it. Click to expand... Oh the conservaturds are way ahead on this score....
lovinthehd Audioholic Jedi Sep 11, 2012 44,861 0 113 Oakridge, OR Jun 1, 2019 #633 Dale Doback said: Libtards = Sore Losers. Click to expand... So you're a sore "winner"? LOL.
lovinthehd Audioholic Jedi Sep 11, 2012 44,861 0 113 Oakridge, OR Jun 1, 2019 #634 Love your picture of your favorite one.
H herbu Audioholic Samurai Aug 1, 2011 2,944 0 113 NC Jun 2, 2019 #637 To my knowledge, no one has ever changed their mind or admitted they were wrong on a political issue due to arguments made here. So trying to convince someone on the other side is futile. However, that doesn't make it less fun to laugh at the close-minded, hypocritical and ignorant liberals. Remember B-HO saying that republicans could come along for the ride, but they'd have to ride in the back of the bus? Well, suck it up pansies. Now it's your turn. Enjoy the view from our rear. Hahahahahahaha!!! Reactions: markw
To my knowledge, no one has ever changed their mind or admitted they were wrong on a political issue due to arguments made here. So trying to convince someone on the other side is futile. However, that doesn't make it less fun to laugh at the close-minded, hypocritical and ignorant liberals. Remember B-HO saying that republicans could come along for the ride, but they'd have to ride in the back of the bus? Well, suck it up pansies. Now it's your turn. Enjoy the view from our rear. Hahahahahahaha!!!
kystorm Audioholic Nov 23, 2017 151 0 28 44 Jun 2, 2019 #638 mtrycrafts said: I think the lawyers, most of them, were federal layers from the justice department and the ones hired were not collecting riches. So, no, their pockets were not lined with riches. Click to expand... Weather it it be some or most, the return wasn't worth the investment unless you're a lawyer
mtrycrafts said: I think the lawyers, most of them, were federal layers from the justice department and the ones hired were not collecting riches. So, no, their pockets were not lined with riches. Click to expand... Weather it it be some or most, the return wasn't worth the investment unless you're a lawyer
lovinthehd Audioholic Jedi Sep 11, 2012 44,861 0 113 Oakridge, OR Jun 2, 2019 #639 Dale Doback said: Oh, and we have elected Libtards pushing 'Exterminate the jews'. And, here's the strange part: 80% of Jews in this country vote for Libtards. ? Death wish? Very strange world we now live in. Click to expand... Whose right wing conspiracy butt did this idiotic "exterminate the jews" thing come from? Is it like pizzagate? Reactions: Trell and mtrycrafts
Dale Doback said: Oh, and we have elected Libtards pushing 'Exterminate the jews'. And, here's the strange part: 80% of Jews in this country vote for Libtards. ? Death wish? Very strange world we now live in. Click to expand... Whose right wing conspiracy butt did this idiotic "exterminate the jews" thing come from? Is it like pizzagate?
mtrycrafts Seriously, I have no life. Aug 19, 2004 23,546 0 113 Jun 2, 2019 #640 kystorm said: Weather it it be some or most, the return wasn't worth the investment unless you're a lawyer Click to expand... In reality, the government made money from all the prosecutions and forfeitures of assets. Reactions: Trell and lovinthehd
kystorm said: Weather it it be some or most, the return wasn't worth the investment unless you're a lawyer Click to expand... In reality, the government made money from all the prosecutions and forfeitures of assets.
