Thanks for the warning regarding Gorilla glue. My friend mentioned it, saying even that is like 10x stronger than the wood itself (he said the wood will break first), but I think he probably had basic maple in mind. But, I'm not sure that Baltic Birch is any stronger. Maybe I'll go back to exchange for titebond. I think I do remember a pic of Gorilla glue in that thread though. Though my friend also mentioned that the PL stuff is even way stronger than Gorilla. The first post in the AVS thread says that any wood glue is fine, but better safe than sorry I suppose.
More purchases to consider:
I was looking at adding additional shelves to my modular studio tech, but they're like $60, and if I was thinking of something like three, then that also could just pay for a new "set". Then I was thinking of Middle Atlantic pro racks, but again I'm lost. I think I would be fine with the "open" style that are much cheaper, but I dunno. I guess they would be "enclosure"-less, but at least that means better ventilation.
Midnight, I need your help again! lol. Remember, I have not yet bought any gear that is "rack-mountable", except for one unnamed power center, I think?
http://www.middleatlantic.com/enclosure/main.htm
Then I also looked into the SVS ASEQ-1. Which also led me to the Audyssey Sub EQ. What I know so far is that they are identical, and that the Pro Kit used to calibrate for the Sub EQ is more precise than the SVS mic, but it also costs around $550 for the Pro Kit. BUT, that Pro kit would work for Pro Audyssey on a capable unit (which I don't own).
I guess the SVS would be the one to go with in this situation, but I do prefer the Audyssey faceplate, and I have read that the lights on the SVS might be bright enough to be deemed offensive.
I cannot see myself accurately calibrating for two subs (of such different nature as well), for such a large listening area. If I experiment with sub placement, with SVS/AS it's only another 1-2 hours to recalibrate, and with a Behringer I don't want to know. I can't imagine interpreting so many graphs, and to get them to work well together; individually first, then as ensemble. Hm.
Oh yeah (man, it seems that there are so many things to look into), but I thankfully caught this blurb by Ivan, with the pro/cons of wiring bridged vs un-bridged:
It is as simple as hooking up as I stated.
In the true bridge mode you will get ha higher voltage swing-which results in more output power, but the damping of the system will be 1/4 of what it would be if you hook up a driver to each output terminal and run it normal.
And by normal, 1 of the drivers HAS to be inverted somewhere. Whether this is by the bridge switch-or the wires hooked to the terminals of the amp or on the connections on one of the drivers-it doesn't matter.
There is no sonic advantage to one vs the other-except that by using the bridge switch to invert the polarity, all the wiring stays "normal" ie +to+.
It is more of a quantity vs quality type thing. And the quality will vary depending on the amp you use-the size wire you use and the length of the wire. You WILL notice a difference in the quantity side of things (if you need it that loud) and may or may not notice a difference in the quality side-it jsut depends
I think I'd prefer tightness over output (since output seems to be so abundant already), but I dunno. I was assuming I'd just follow the given instructions, you know: K.I.S.S.