I don't think Dennis murphy would appreciate being called denise...
Absolutely! I know what you mean for sure. I just want to get it right the first time! After I posted the one about the silk dome verses titanium tweets, I listened to the Infinitys in my garage then listened to the JBLs in my house. Infinitys are silk dome and JBLs are titanium. JBLs take the cake for sure, hands down. So I guess, to me, I would say I like the sound of the titanium dome tweets better. That's also what I have in my car (MB Quartz components w/ titanium tweets) and I love the way they reproduce sound. I just think they give a lot more detail.
and you may find a silk dome that wipes the floor with the JBLs in terms of detail. Don't hold too much bias based on material, it's only one aspect of a tweeter's design. Buying solely based on material will often cause you to overpay. It's all about end performance. The 3/4" hiquphon OW2 for example is a soft dome tweeter and yet it's considered among many people's favorite tweeters for its ability to extract detail without sounding harsh.
Further.. there's a few things wrong with what you said
1) THe garage and house are different environments. the tweeter's interaction with its environment has a VERY strong effect on what you hear. an environment is capable of smearing detail.
2) a crossover is not a brick wall filter. When you listen to a speaker, even if you focus on the highs, you're still going to hear the interaction of the drivers. What you think is a preference for metal dome may just be a preference for a certain effect of the crossover.
3) the comparision wasn't level matched or blind.
4) The sample size is too small. You'd need to blindly listen to like 50 level matched tweeters of each material and then read your results afterwards to really make a judgement.
The only reason I was concidering a 3 way is I want a bigger woofer. I've never heard good bass from a 6 1/2", I want a bit more punch. I'm afraid that if I did a 2-way w/ an 8" (or possibly a 10") woofer, it wouldn't sound right but that's coming from me who hasn't ever attempted this before. I know I could do a 2 way w/ a powered sub, but I was hoping to avoid that.
Any speaker, 2 or 3 or 4 way, with a powered sub is still always recommended. This is because the best placement for good imaging is often poor placement for bass integration in a room.
You'd be surprised how much bass a great 3 driver, 2-way speaker can do. 6.5 inch drivers are very capable, particulary the high end european ones, although that's not to sell asian drivers short as they're a good bang for buck.
check out this build for example:
http://forums.audioholics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=68531
That borders on a genuine full range speaker with extension down to 34hz... and it's a 2-way!
This uses a 15" woofer... and is very much a two way speaker which people love!
I guess based on that, would you still recommend a 2-way for simplicity over the 3-way? Or should I just dive in and go the 3-way route? (Almost sounds perverted
!)
2 way if passive plain and simple. I still recommend a proven design.
3-way if building a proven design
to a tee. There's many awesome ones out there, and from the graphs you get a feel for how "good" they are.
3-way if you go active... you can go passive on the 2-way and then pair it with a woofer section actively.
One other question- what gains do I get by using multiple amps to power a 3-way? Only reason I'm asking is aren't I essentially bi (or in this case tri) amping them? And I posted in another area about wether or not to bi-amp my JBLs and general concensus was that bi-amping them w/ my Yamaha receiver wasn't worth it.
That's passive bi amping with a receiver. It's totally pointless with minimal advantage. You're better off getting a powerful home amp like an emotiva XPA-2
Active bi-amping completely removes a passive crossover from the equation. It improves sensitivity, takes away a lot of complexity, and with the use of a digital active filter, is infinitely tweakable with the press of a button. You don't necessarily need the most powerful amps in the world, because of the improved efficiency. You just need a fair about of amp channels. The linkwitz orion is a full active speaker that uses 4 channels per speaker, for a total of 8 channels. Instead of a bunch of expensive amps, it actually just uses a 12 channel, 60 watt ATI6012 amplifier. The four extra channels are wasted in that design but can be used to power other speakers if desired.
the hypex dsp is actually an amplifier (2 x 100w into a 4 ohm load) and a digital active crossover(2 or 3-way... need one more amp for the bass section if you decide to go 3way). very useful IMO, and it's built into the speaker as a plate amp.
A 3-way passive speaker just has too many issues to be worthwhile.
I've never used an external home audio amp, but is it maybe so you have the ability to independantly adjust the gains on each driver in the cabinet?
Not necessarily at the amplifier level. You could control driver levels at the crossover, for example a Behringer DCX2496.