How do you reconcile such a sweeping immoderate statement with your role as "moderator"?
Being a moderator does not bar me from having an opinion. Sorry if you don't like it, but that is my opinion. Last I checked we are still allowed to have those in this country. If you think my statement is incorrect then by all means prove it wrong.
Actually, jeffsg4mac, you made a broad, sweeping accusation against a large community of people from all walks of life. I believe the onus is on
you to prove
your statement is correct.
If I were to say that Charlton Heston is a crazy, senile old coot and therefore shouldn't be allowed near a firearm, would it be fair to say the same about all NRA members? Do you think I should have to prove
that statement? Of course I should.
Just to be clear, I'm not trying to pick on Mr. Heston or the NRA, which is comprised of millions upstanding citizens; I'm just trying to illustrate my point.
Of course, you can make such accusations all you want. I'm just saying that broad sweeping statements which stereotype a group of people are
not going to convince any free-thinking, intelligent reader unless
you come up with supporting evidence.
Someone could say that Christianity is full of degenerates due to the high profile cases of some Roman Catholic clergy being involved in serious sexual misconduct, or televangelists fleecing their flocks and living high on the hog. As a Christian, I would take grave offence to such accusations.
What it boils down to is, if you make such accusations, don't expect to be taken seriously as a moderator. Goodman's question was perfectly valid.