One can check system information to see just what the hell is going on. One can also post a pic of that information for the benefit of all.
View attachment 73769
So, I have got round to doing what you wanted. It does not let you show an eARC input. When you try you can't see the setup screen. Anyhow I used a BPO BD disc that sounds identical to the stream of the same program.
So this is the photograph of the input screen you asked for. I doubt that will make you much the wiser, as I already told that information.
Now let's go back to square one. I am not going to the trouble of doing measurements on this unit on the bench. First it has been measured by two competent individuals so I would have nothing to add. The measurements are exemplary, with SNR having a colossal improvement.
I did not buy the AV 10 with the expectation of greatly improved SQ, except for absence of audible background in a silent room. This I have verified and the room no signal is totally quiet. You would not know the rig was on, with the other AVRs you did, as soon as they were switched on. Part of this is due to that fact 12 drivers in the system are directly connected to their amps with no passive crossover. A passive crossover will attenuate the signal 3 to 12 db depending on order, so 3db of first and 6db for second and so on.
Now lets address why I made the mistake of buying the 7706. I guess I figured that the AV 10 would not be a huge improvement, it was costly and I thought the 7705 failure was bad luck. But I think the bigger reason was idleness. The 7706 was physically and exact replacement.
The AV 10 is taller, longer and weighs 37lb. It also required a costly (over $300.00) and heavy aftermarket rack case. In this rig it has to be rack mounted, no doubt about that. So getting the weight up to 50 lb. meant careful thought. That is far too much weight to be supported just on the front rack ears. Truly pro equipment of that weight goes between the front AND back mounting holes, so is bolted to the rack front and back.
So I had to contrive a shelf on rails between the front and back girders of the rack. This worked well. Then there were gaps, as the mount had standard spacing but other domestic units do not. So I had to fashion spacers to supplement the two 3U rack spacers I bought. These had to be fabricated in my shop and painted. This whole process spread over three days, actually four with all the set up and measuring.
Now whether you want to believe me or not, the sonic soundstage presented by the AV 10 is dramatically better and more realistic than the two that went before. The BPO call their Atmos stream immersive audio. With the 7705 and 7706 the sound was in no way immersive, with the AV 10 it truly is. This is the first time I have truly heard the famed acoustic of the Philharmonie in Berlin. You realistically hear the ring of the hall and superb left right, front back and height representation of the orchestra choirs and high balcony musicians and choirs when present. The previous units fell way short of that realization. I am not imagining that, it is the absolute truth, whether you want to believe it or not.
So, this leads me to speculate on the practicality of the point we have reached in home audio.
I think a good reason that the other units failed was that they were based on AVRs, and the components did not have adequate spacing. When I build my HTPCs and DAWs, I am very fussy as to layout. I measure temperatures of critical components carefully, and my builds have had very "long legs". This was one of many lessons I learned from Peter Walker, that internal layout is critically important. If you throw it together it will be short lived.
That gets me to the point I been hammering for a long time, especially as complexity has increased and the number of power amps increased at the same time.
So, in my view an Atmos receiver is a total waste of time and resources. More than two or three power amps to a case runs it a close second.
This is especially true with Atmos, as the speakers other then the front three can take significant power.
I honestly think if we are going to pursue all these channels and speakers, it makes the case for active speakers. This not only makes more room in the AVP for better cooling and longer life, but effectively frees up space in the room. The big advantage is that it means there will only be two or three amplifiers per box. The will end this power per channels driven nonsense. Power amps should be able to deliver their designed power at anytime called for, and NOT dependent on what neighboring amps are doing. That is the route to disaster.
So yes, I am pleased I now have the AV10 installed with results above my expectation, but it highlights that in terms of home AV system we are driving headlong down the wrong road to the cliff. We need to change our hardware architecture and current practices fast, or people will get more discouraged than they are now.