Honestly I haven't had a chance to read what you linked.
Here is some more reading and this time from the former center-right Swedish Prime Minister Carl Bildt about JD Vance:
>>>…Vance’s advocacy for appeasement should surprise no one. In a 2022 podcast with Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President
Donald Trump’s (currently imprisoned) political guru Steve Bannon, he said: “I don’t really care what happens to
Ukraine one way or another.” His argument essentially is that because
Russia is larger than Ukraine, it can lob more bombs and missiles than the Ukrainians and their Western backers can handle.
Russia undoubtedly is bigger than Ukraine. But if that is grounds for Ukraine to accept defeat, the same argument could be applied to eight other neighboring countries that were at some point part of the Russian/Soviet empire.
Vance is effectively green-lighting Russian President
Vladimir Putin’s aspiration to resurrect the old empire through conquest. The only neighbor left would be
China, Russia’s “no-limits” partner. …<<<
In a commentary published by the New York Times this past April, J.D. Vance, now the U.S. Republican vice-presidential nominee, proposed a strategy of “defense” for Ukraine that was nothing but a recipe for defeat. There can be no doubt that his words were closely read, and well
kyivindependent.com