So I'm failing to acknowledge the Russia Hoax but you're failing to acknowledge the likelihood of the Clinton's or Obama filing over 60 federal cases, finding no evidence of fraud, and continuing the push the election fraud? Even with your Hillary checklist, it would seem to me the woman is still "less worse" because she didn't go that far.
Your holding out for the 10K of tape for some deep information even though what's before our eyes is a man who pushed the Stop the Steal BS and continues to push the Big Lie he lost.
Hold out FOX as this paragon of virtue over CNN?
Or you could find another Republican to believe in besides Trump? I'm sure there's plenty.
I'll restate: It's certainly fun pointing out FOX's sins but the evidence that all the Corporate Media(owned by the 1%) do the same is out there if you look and are not a partisan. It's meant to divide us.
You don't watch Fox or CNN. Remember?
Oh boy. I was referring to the career arc of Clinton vs Trump. Again no comparison in level of depravity.
Now, if you want to only focus on "pushing election fraud", you cannot. Trump was in power and lost election and tried his ill advised shenanigans. Clinton was not president when she lost the election. She did not have the power to try what Trump has. No one can say what Hillary would have done if she was in power and lost to Trump. Her character being what it is, God knows what she would have done. One thing we can say, it would have been supported by the media.
The Russia Hoax is worse that pushing the election fraud scheme. Its still early but the Durham investigations are ongoing. it would not surprise me if it determines that the Clintons ,FBI, CIA, and various other departments of gov't were players in it. The Media played its part perfectly for almost 5 years.
The words I used were."holding CNN out as a paragon of virtue". I certainly did not call Fox a paragon of virtue. Cute rewording. I have a lot of experience with lawyer, you are going to have to up your game.
Never said I do not believe in any other candidate besides Trump. Again you are rewording. What I have said is that Trump will probably get the nomination because he is too powerful in the party. That does not mean he is my first choice.
And to finish, you might remember I don't watch Fox or CNN. Although I must admit after watching the Avenatti interview I will be open to watching Tucker depending on the guest. Will do the same for Rogan now that they are trying to censor him. I would like to make up my own mind and not rely on others for my opinions.
So where does that leave us:
All the media seeks to divide us and makes a good deal of money doing it.
Censorship backfires.
Wikipedia is considered unreliable by American Universities.
CNN LOL is a joke and not taken seriously even by democrats who watch other channels including Fox.
Yes, I am still waiting for the tapes. It's called evidence. If they eventually show there was no instigation or entrapment by gov't agencies, than I will eventually agree with you. If they show there was well that's a different conversation.
If Trump does get the Republican nod, the ONLY consolation will be the fun in watching heads explode on CNN. Maybe I'll finally tune in. Hopefully they will be finished with all the pedopelia investigations by then.
Apologies for the length of this and the spelling to interested readers but had a lot to unpack/vent.
Anyway, I bid you good evening as I have to get to work to pay the bills.
