Another low for our good friend Tucker Carlson

D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Spartan
Ha, I never called him greatest ever. I don't think you read mu

Ha, I don't think he's the greatest ever. You are thinking of others. Some claim Obama was the greatest ever.
It's opinion.
You also did not read my post about the three branches of gov't. He lost two.
Yet Trump thinks he's the greatest ever along with his base. That's my point. There are "winners" and "losers" in his world thinking. The point is the Republicans currently hold zero branches including the WH.
 
SithZedi

SithZedi

Audioholic General
OK, I can't help what Trump or his base thinks. Obama and Bill Clinton supporter that I know think the same for them. Some of them also think Hillary was the greatest non President. Can't help that either.
As to your second point. Please name the three branches of Gov't that Trump lost?
 
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Spartan
OK, I can't help what Trump or his base thinks. Obama and Bill Clinton supporter that I know think the same for them. Some of them also think Hillary was the greatest non President. Can't help that either.
As to your second point. Please name the three branches of Gov't that Trump lost?
The WH, and the tone he set on the social/political climate certainly contributed to losing the Senate and House.
 
SithZedi

SithZedi

Audioholic General
The WH, and the tone he set on the social/political climate certainly contributed to losing the Senate and House.
The White House is the Executive Branch, The Senate and House are the Legislative Branch.
The Judicial Branch is on its own.

I agree with the term "certainly contributed". Just as its entirely accurate to say that the social/political climate of the Obama years contributed to Trump's election. The climate of the Bush years lead to Obama's election.

Many factors contributed to the Republicans loss. One of the most fascinating and reads on the factors that contributed to the result pasted below. This came from Time magazine! which is reliably Lefty. The story was ignored by the media like Hunter's laptop.

This is on the back of finding out yesterday that the Dems spent $1.5b vs 900m Repubs in that election.
Read and make up your own mind.

 
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Spartan
The White House is the Executive Branch, The Senate and House are the Legislative Branch.
The Judicial Branch is on its own.

I agree with the term "certainly contributed". Just as its entirely accurate to say that the social/political climate of the Obama years contributed to Trump's election. The climate of the Bush years lead to Obama's election.

Many factors contributed to the Republicans loss. One of the most fascinating and reads on the factors that contributed to the result pasted below. This came from Time magazine! which is reliably Lefty. The story was ignored by the media like Hunter's laptop.

This is on the back of finding out yesterday that the Dems spent $1.5b vs 900m Repubs in that election.
Read and make up your own mind.

I think Trump's behavior played a significant role in energizing the left to get out the vote. Period. The revenge vote. Since so much of politics is swayed by momentum, galvanizing etc, I'm more inclined to think the reason the Repubs didn't match the Dems in campaign funds is because even they weren't feeling it for Trump anymore.
 
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Spartan
Hunter's laptop- I'll go with what another cabinet member said that Trump wasn't interested in the outcome but rather wanted an announcement into the Hunter investigation because he felt Joe was his biggest obstacle to winning a second election. Is it fair it wasn't covered by the left? No I suppose not, but I'm also not convinced it would've mattered when compared to the polarizing Trump.
 
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Spartan
It was sorta like the Cuomo stuff months back. A Fox host was complaining why the story doesn't "stick." Well because after four years of working overtime to cover up for Trump's antics that's kinda the payback.
 
SithZedi

SithZedi

Audioholic General
So you have moved from "certainly contributed" to "played a significant role".
Think what you want. You are completely underestimating/underplaying the impact of Money, Big Tech, and Media censorship.

The Hunter Laptop story broke out two weeks from election day. If it would have been properly addressed by our Third World Media(i like the sound of that) at that time it alone might have been enough to sway a close election. It was buried. Biden said that "Hunter is the smartest guy I know". Clown world....o_O

You write of revenge vote? Just wait until this November. Unless of course, Biden and Dems "behaviour" throw shade on that election too because, as you know, it's only divisive if Orange man does it.:mad:

 
SithZedi

SithZedi

Audioholic General
It was sorta like the Cuomo stuff months back. A Fox host was complaining why the story doesn't "stick." Well because after four years of working overtime to cover up for Trump's antics that's kinda the payback.
So you are saying because of being exhausted by protecting orange man, its understandable that the Media can ignore 15,000 deaths and attacking multiple women?
 
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Spartan
So you are saying because of being exhausted by protecting orange man, its understandable that the Media can ignore 15,000 deaths and attacking multiple women?
Well that wasn't the story then. It was the women stuff.
 
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Spartan
So you have moved from "certainly contributed" to "played a significant role".
Think what you want. You are completely underestimating/underplaying the impact of Money, Big Tech, and Media censorship.

The Hunter Laptop story broke out two weeks from election day. If it would have been properly addressed by our Third World Media(i like the sound of that) at that time it alone might have been enough to sway a close election. It was buried. Biden said that "Hunter is the smartest guy I know". Clown world....o_O

You write of revenge vote? Just wait until this November. Unless of course, Biden and Dems "behaviour" throw shade on that election too because, as you know, it's only divisive if Orange man does it.:mad:

Yeah possibly. The cabinet members comment was I think at least two years earlier so big money probably did play a role.

Totally. The Dems own all branches so if there's big red wave it's on them just as the blue wave was on Trump. A 7-10% inflation rate well yeah that's the direction we're headed. Trump losing? No I don't feel sorry for him.
 
SithZedi

SithZedi

Audioholic General
Yeah possibly. The cabinet members comment was I think at least two years earlier so big money probably did play a role.

Totally. The Dems own all branches so if there's big red wave it's on them just as the blue wave was on Trump. A 7-10% inflation rate well yeah that's the direction we're headed. Trump losing? No I don't feel sorry for him.
Elections are cyclical at times. Sometimes its a ripple vote, or a push. Sometimes, a wave. Sometimes a tsunami like in 1984. Not strangely the tsunami's occur when the extremists in the party (and the Media which should serve as a check on power but don't) pull the moderates too far from the center. Like McGovern in 1972.

In the coming election, the Dems are too far to the left and Biden's operatives(He reads the teleprompter) are either to weak to confront them, incompetent, or in agreement . Pick your poison. Bill Maher had it right in his recent vent. Combine that with mandate fatigue, rebellion against woke culture, regulations, speed cameras, inflation, parents being investigated by the FBI, on and on. The wave will only get higher.

IRO Biden, an old Soviet joke fits:
After a speech, Brezhnev confronts his speechwriter. "I asked for a 15-minute speech, but the one you gave me lasted 45 minutes!" The speechwriter replies: "I gave you three copies..."
 
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Spartan
Elections are cyclical at times. Sometimes its a ripple vote, or a push. Sometimes, a wave. Sometimes a tsunami like in 1984. Not strangely the tsunami's occur when the extremists in the party (and the Media which should serve as a check on power but don't) pull the moderates too far from the center. Like McGovern in 1972.

Reagan was 3800 votes from taking my state MN and winning every state. I think the other landslide was Nixon's victory. FDR had some huge victories too.
 
SithZedi

SithZedi

Audioholic General
Elections are cyclical at times. Sometimes its a ripple vote, or a push. Sometimes, a wave. Sometimes a tsunami like in 1984. Not strangely the tsunami's occur when the extremists in the party (and the Media which should serve as a check on power but don't) pull the moderates too far from the center. Like McGovern in 1972.

Reagan was 3800 votes from taking my state MN and winning every state. I think the other landslide was Nixon's victory. FDR had some huge victories too.
Ah, Prince's home state! God I miss him, what a fantastic talent. RIP...
 
lovinthehd

lovinthehd

Audioholic Jedi
Either party only needs find someone with a personality most can agree on....policy I don't think would be critical if such can be found again. Actors seem to do well, funny how that works.
 
SithZedi

SithZedi

Audioholic General
Either party only needs find someone with a personality most can agree on....policy I don't think would be critical if such can be found again. Actors seem to do well, funny how that works.
Funny you say that. I would add someone who the public thinks is an outsider too. I thought Matthew McConaughey would of had a shot to win in Texas....He might be that type of candidate.
 
lovinthehd

lovinthehd

Audioholic Jedi
Every time I see the thread title I chuckle some more....how can he go lower?

Yet he manages....what a maroon.
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top