majorloser

majorloser

Moderator
Does anybody remeber those old tube testing machines they used to have in the stores? Put your tube in the proper socket, turn the dial to the right setting and push the button to test.:rolleyes:

I can remember going with my old man when he thought he could fix anything.
 
R

ruadmaa

Banned
Tube Testers In Drug Stores

majorloser said:
Does anybody remeber those old tube testing machines they used to have in the stores? Put your tube in the proper socket, turn the dial to the right setting and push the button to test.:rolleyes:

I can remember going with my old man when he thought he could fix anything.
Yes, when tubes were used in televisions, tube testers were common place just about everywhere. What people don't seem to remember is how much trouble tubes were. When tvs used tubes they were always broken down. There were two controls on a tv set that don't even exist anymore. They were the vertical and horizontal hold. More often than not when you turned the tv on it was always rolling and had to be adjusted. For those of you that think tubes are great I would say that you really don't know what you are talking about. Tubes are nothing but trouble.
 
mulester7

mulester7

Audioholic Samurai
ruadmaa said:
Yes, when tubes were used in televisions, tube testers were common place just about everywhere. What people don't seem to remember is how much trouble tubes were. When tvs used tubes they were always broken down. There were two controls on a tv set that don't even exist anymore. They were the vertical and horizontal hold. More often than not when you turned the tv on it was always rolling and had to be adjusted. For those of you that think tubes are great I would say that you really don't know what you are talking about. Tubes are nothing but trouble.
.....tubes in audio bring added distortion, period....whether or not the distortion can be harnessed to be acceptable to the listener as "warmth", it's still distortion....I say off with it's head, and let's keep things in perspective....for multiple areas of improvement, solid-state replaced tubes, not vice-versa......
 
B

buckyg4

Junior Audioholic
LOL.. I laugh when I read all of these negative comments on tubes. I guess none of you realize that extent of tubes (mic/guitar pres, compressor/limiter, an occasional mic, etc..) used in recording this music that we listen too:) Tubes have a different sound yes, do they add distortion yes.. So what, added warmth to a sterile SS setup is worth it in my opinion, if you are only listening to rap/techno/hip hop don't bother, but outside of those genres warmth and an increased soundstage and a more live concert like sound is nice to my ears. The fact that tubes are still around and they are still designing new equipment means that people still like it.
 
mulester7

mulester7

Audioholic Samurai
buckyg4 said:
LOL.. I laugh when I read all of these negative comments on tubes. I guess none of you realize that extent of tubes (mic/guitar pres, compressor/limiter, an occasional mic, etc..) used in recording this music that we listen too:) Tubes have a different sound yes, do they add distortion yes.. So what, added warmth to a sterile SS setup is worth it in my opinion, if you are only listening to rap/techno/hip hop don't bother, but outside of those genres warmth and an increased soundstage and a more live concert like sound is nice to my ears. The fact that tubes are still around and they are still designing new equipment means that people still like it.
.....boys, we done been laughed at....I can appreciate that strong a stand....Bucky, you inspire me to probably go listen to a McIntosh tubed pre-amp....it's for sure I would hear it as it's supposed to be heard through this Earthquake....I appreciate your stand......
 
jeffsg4mac

jeffsg4mac

Republican Poster Boy
Anything added to the original signal that is not supposed to be there is not accurate, it is just that simple. Tubes add something that is not part of the original source material. If you like that then fine buy it, but don't say it is better or more accurate because that is just false. DVD-Audio and SACD on a solid state amp is anything but sterile and lacking in depth.
 
K

kgturner

Audioholic Intern
jeffsg4mac said:
Anything added to the original signal that is not supposed to be there is not accurate, it is just that simple. Tubes add something that is not part of the original source material. If you like that then fine buy it, but don't say it is better or more accurate because that is just false. DVD-Audio and SACD on a solid state amp is anything but sterile and lacking in depth.
accuracy is not always the ultimate goal of the listener. i had an accurate aragon system. i prefer my supratek/cary tube system. i'll take a more emotional connection to the music than a more accurate connection any day. it's just opposite sides of the same coin. i don't think anybody here is arguing that tubes are more accurate. but they are "better" in my opinion when it comes to connecting the listener (me) to the music.

kevin t
 
highfihoney

highfihoney

Audioholic Samurai
jeffsg4mac said:
Anything added to the original signal that is not supposed to be there is not accurate, it is just that simple. Tubes add something that is not part of the original source material.
that's an untrue statement,a tube amplifier or preamplifier does not add some mysterious element or alter the signal in any way,tube's are simply the fore father's of transistor's,infact most tube amplifier's require much less wiring & interior part's then any solid state amp.

weather your running solid state or tube's tone control's & loudness contour add to the signal & so do ht processor's/reciever's but no type amplifier add's anything to the signal.

the only way to have a truly pure signal that is not affected by anything is to run the source direct to the amp.
 
B

buckyg4

Junior Audioholic
On a well desinged piece of tube equipment you can find tube compliments that are as transparent as transistors, if thats what you want. The fun thing about tubes is that you can vary the sound with the ease of switching a tube. This is a big benefit when one changes amps, speakers, interconnects, etc..

Better is subjective and is thus an opinion so no one is wrong in this respect. More accurate.... Well. Thats a tought call. What do you consider the baseline for accuracy? Were you there for the recording and mastering process and do you know what the sound was intended to be?

jeffsg4mac said:
Anything added to the original signal that is not supposed to be there is not accurate, it is just that simple. Tubes add something that is not part of the original source material. If you like that then fine buy it, but don't say it is better or more accurate because that is just false. DVD-Audio and SACD on a solid state amp is anything but sterile and lacking in depth.
 
highfihoney

highfihoney

Audioholic Samurai
kgturner said:
accuracy is not always the ultimate goal of the listener.

kevin t
i agree 100% accurate does not mean better sounding,in my case i hate an accurate sunding rig that present's only the signal & no way to tailor the sound in any way.

a little off topic & im not trying to hijack this thread but i wanted to ask you about your supratek preamp,what a beautiful peice of equipment that is,any of you guy's that have never saw a supratek pre should do a google on them,work's of art:)

i know supratek does not incorporate tone control's into their preamp's so this is what i wanted to ask you about,how do you get past the lack of tonal adjustment or is it a non issue in your system?

for my listening taste's i find tone control's to be a must have option,i might go from listening to miles davis at low level's right into black sabbath at stupidly high spl's & without tone control's & especially loudness i find it extremely difficult to make the change in different type's of music.

im sure you know the bad rap that mac gear get's from the elite audiophile's so there's no need to go into all of that but it's been reccomended to me to try pre's higher up the food chain to hear the difference,i havnt tried any of the supratek's yet but i did try a pass lab's & an audio research but both left me really feeling the absence of the tone control's.

im just curious as to what impact if any the lack of tonal adjustment has made in your rig?

have a good evening:)
 
highfihoney

highfihoney

Audioholic Samurai
mulester7 said:
Bucky, you inspire me to probably go listen to a McIntosh tubed pre-amp....it's for sure I would hear it as it's supposed to be heard through this Earthquake....I appreciate your stand......
im not sure you would be all that impressed with them,ive tried every tube preamp made by mac with the exception of the new model that cost as much as a house & i find them to be weak in bass control,i used to own the mcintosh c-2200 tube pre at the same time as my current c-39 solid state pre/pro & i found that most of the time i prefered the older solid state model c-39,to me the solid state preamp's seem to present the music in a way more in tune with my taste's.

a point of interest is this,this year the new preamp for mcintosh is a 3 pc unit that allow's the use of either total solid state or total tube all in one preamp,ive not heard one yet but surely that unit has got to be able to illustrate the difference's between the 2 different type's.

i know one thing that for 45k this thing had damm well better sound like angel's singing:)

http://www.mcintoshlabs.com/mcprod/shopdisplayproducts.asp?id=18&cat=Audio+Control+Centers&prodid=1116&product=C1000C
 
K

kgturner

Audioholic Intern
hfh:

the overall sound of the cary's is what i love the most. i wanted a preamp that wouldn't interfere with it's sound, but i still wanted to stay in the tube arena as i had demoed an audio research sp-16l (which is an excellent performer for the money) and felt a tubed pre was the way to go. the supratek caught my eye as the chardonnay was in my searching price range. the supratek has two sets of gain controls which allow for some tailoring as far as overall volume is concerned. you can always roll tubes as a source of "tone controls". my experience with tube rolling has been inconclusive so i don't really tout the need for NOS tubes as much other tube lovers. maybe more experimentation is in line, but i have other monetary priorities right now. the preamp itself is excellent, allowing the sound of the cary to come through while still adding it's own flavor. the bass is significantly better than the denon 3805 i was using as a pre (i had to wait 8 months for the supratek to be built due to mick running a one man operation). the soundstage is much wider and higher. the sweetspot is also bigger than before.

kevin t
 
mulester7

mulester7

Audioholic Samurai
highfihoney said:
im not sure you would be all that impressed with them,ive tried every tube preamp made by mac with the exception of the new model that cost as much as a house & i find them to be weak in bass control
.....HiFi, please tell me what you heard that was different in the mids and highs using the tubed Mac pre-amps....you have experienced McIntosh from stem to stern, please try to describe this "warmth" thing....
 
highfihoney

highfihoney

Audioholic Samurai
the tube sound

mulester7 said:
.....HiFi, please tell me what you heard that was different in the mids and highs using the tubed Mac pre-amps....you have experienced McIntosh from stem to stern, please try to describe this "warmth" thing....
please keep in mind my descripion's only apply to 2 channel & not home theater , with no processor's in the loop & true full range paper cone speaker's with no sub,i have never tested tube preaplification vs solid state preamplification for home theater.

the difference's between solid state preamplification & tube preamplification are subtle but they are there, solid state pre's overall sound have more impact in the bass region over a tube pre,a tube pre tend's to present the bass in a more mello less dramatic way & with less impact.

the presentation in the mid's with a solid state pre tend to reinforce the bass where the mid's using a tube pre are more seperated & easier to hear & dont reinforce the bass,this may be caused by the weaker bass slam in the tube pre allowing more mid's to be cleanly heard.

the high's with a solid state pre are more accurate over a tube pre with a stronger sound over the tube pre,some guy's think the high's with solid state pre's are too harsh & refer to this as being "too bright" while the high's with a tube pre have a little less edge or bite to them creating a warmer sound.

the overall difference's are that a solid state preamp is more dynamic with a stronger sound,when i use strong & dynamic as example's im not refering to spl's but rather the impact the music has on the listener,im also using the catch word dynamic to describe how you can feel the music in your chest with a solid state preamp more than that of a tube preamp.

the overall presentation with a tube preamp is best described as a more mellow sound with the mid's & high's being cleaner sounding with the high's being less harsh on thing's like guitar solo's & female vocal's with the mid's being more up front in the total sound as oposed to being right in the middle with a solid state pre.

the last tube preamp that i was running was the mcintosh c-2200,when i would compare the sound with the c-39 solid state preamp that im currently running i would alway's feel as if something was missing from the bass,at high listening level's the music had less direct impact on me making the sound feel less dynamic,not a bad sound but for high impact rock music or heavy blues i felt something was missing that i could not get dialed in with tone control's,the solid state preamp was a better performer with rock & heavy blues.

running the same comparison's in the rig i found that for jazz music or accoustic instramental music i much prefered the sound of the c-2200 tube preamp over the c39 solid state,the tube preamp presented the music in a softer more refined way,thinner bass response,more defined midrange,softer high's,closer to the sound from a live music experience over the solid state.

the difference's in sound that i described are alot of the reason that people biamp using solid state amp's for the woofer's & tube amp's to drive the mid's & high's,kind of a best of both world's deal.

a good way to experience the tube sound without breaking the bank is to insert a tube buffer in the chain between your cd player & the preamp or reciever,cary audio used to make 2 different model's & musical fidelity still makes them,both are very reasonable in price,i prefered the cary over the musical fidelity.

the cary audio model # is CAD 5500,one version of the cad 5500 can also be used as a preamp as it has balance control & volume control,the other version of the cad 5500 has no control's at all & cary call's it "the black box" but both model #'s are the same,the musical fidelity model # is x-10.

the difference's are easily heard with a tube buffer in the loop,i ran the cary in my rig for several year's with the cary on one cd player for the mellowness of tube's & the other cd player with nothing in between for more punch,below is a pic of the rig i ran the cary in to illustrate how i exploited the difference's,i had a custom face plate made for the cary,if you look close it say's mcintosh in bold gold lettering but it's the cary cad 5500(black box) with a custom glass face,the rig in the link is the same system used for all the comparison's i described above.

cary cad 5500

http://mcintoshlaboratory.tripod.com/gal/p/sysi.jpg

the model from musical fidelty is the x-10.

http://www.musicalfidelity.com/mf/en/Products/SmallX

i hope i explained the difference's well enough but in the end there's no substitute for experiencing the difference in your rig with a sound that your used to & comfortable with,maybee kgturner will chime in,being that he is running a tube preamp he might be able to explain further or correct some of my description's.

have a good evening.:)
 
B

Bevan

Audioholic
brought a prima luna prologue 2 home for the weekend, just out of curiosity, and hooked it up to some dynaudio focus 140's. 3 hours later my arcam was up for sale.

so i thought i'd check audioholics for any edifying tube talk. was i wrong!

well done to those of you who kept the thread going as long as you did, there were some good posts once one waded through all the ignorance.

to anyone who arrives here, you might want to visit ecoustic.com - tube talk.

b
 
C

cornelius

Full Audioholic
I've heard lots of good things about those amps! Have fun...
 
B

Bevan

Audioholic
thanks cornelius.

it does seem to be getting a lot of very enthusiastic reviews. i took it home on a hunch, at that stage only having heard one guy recommend it. i'm very glad i did.

i think everyone who gains more enjoyment from music than from the idea that they have 'acurate' sytems should do themselves a favour and home demo a good(not neccessarily expensive) tube amp.

unfortunately many people on this forum seem unable to drop the fig-leaf of numerical data. it is something thats easy to hide behind, and it gives them a voice(even where its not wanted). understandably they dont want to loose that.

cheers

b.
 
JoeE SP9

JoeE SP9

Senior Audioholic
jeffsg4mac said:
Zumbo, my god man, In my best ren hoek voice "YOU IDIOT, TUBES SOUND LIKE SHEET MAN, DONT WASTE YOUR TIME. :D

If your really want to know what tube amps sound like, then turn on your ADCOM amp, put on one of your favorite songs, get a beer, sit down, relax, and then shove some cotton in your ears smeared with dog doodoo. That's is basically what most tube amps sound like. Every tube amp I have ever heard sounded so colored and non neutral it was sick. But hey, that is my just my opinion and I am sticking to it.
Have you ever heard any ARC or Conrad Johnson tube gear?:cool:
 
JoeE SP9

JoeE SP9

Senior Audioholic
ruadmaa said:
Yes, when tubes were used in televisions, tube testers were common place just about everywhere. What people don't seem to remember is how much trouble tubes were. When tvs used tubes they were always broken down. There were two controls on a tv set that don't even exist anymore. They were the vertical and horizontal hold. More often than not when you turned the tv on it was always rolling and had to be adjusted. For those of you that think tubes are great I would say that you really don't know what you are talking about. Tubes are nothing but trouble.
As a tube user I would say you don't know what you are talking about. I started using tubes in 1967. I switched over to SS as everyone else did. As my speakers got better I went back to tubes and stayed. I use SS amps for my subs and that's all. My preamp is tubed also. Have you listened to any tube gear lately? Before you condem something you should investigate it.:cool:
 
J

Javry

Audiophyte
I know this is a little late but I agree. I think tubes sound better.
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top