3dB, with due respect I would have to at least partially disagree with you on this simply because I don't think there are established standard definitions that AV manufacturers can follow, all those so call straight, direct, and pure direct could, and probably do mean slightly different from one another.
Take the 4308 (that I own) for instance, you could set it up such that pure direct would work like the way you describe if the input is analog. However, if the input is digital, it's setup menu offer the flexibility for you to select the subwoofer on or off. It only defines pure direct as follow:
"DIRECT :
In this mode the signals bypass the tone control circuitry for high
quality sound.
The sound is output to the same channels as the input signal.
The display when the DIRECT mode is selected depends on the input
signal.
For multi-channel sources, the display depends on the surround back
output’s play mode.
When in the PURE DIRECT mode, the GUI screen is not displayed
and the display on the main unit is turned off.
• If the HDMI input connector is selected, video outputs are output in
the PURE DIRECT mode.
• The channel level and surround parameters in the PURE DIRECT
mode are the same as in the DIRECT mode."
So if the source is digital, you have the option to use the sub even when pure direct is selected.
This is what the Yamaha RX-V1800 manual says:
"When the Pure Direct mode is
activated, this unit plays back the selected source with the
least circuitry."Note that it just says "least".
Denon says something like that too in other parts of the manual. I understand no one is saying one is better than the other, it boils down to how one wish to define pure direct. To me, direct is direct, as soon as you add another adjective such as pure, then it begs the question, what is pure, how pure, etc. That's just me, others will think differently. This subject will by nature remain controversial as no one (yet) has the authority to rule on the definition.