I recently had a very good friend develop paranoid schizophrenia (runs in his family) and I had the pleasure of taking him to the nuthouse hoping they would at least get him medicated and in his right mind. They agreed to keep him for an extended stay but apparently it’s illegal to medicate the clinically insane against their will. They are are completely batshit crazy and it’s against the law to get them in their right minds nd so that they can make a decision on if they want to be sane or insane. I get that there’s arguments on both sides of this but common sense tells me getting someone to a point that they can somewhat think straight to make an informed decision about their mental health is probably a good idea.
In theory it might be possible to get a court order allowing medication against the person's will:
>>>Every State provides avenues through which, for example, a doctor or institution can seek appointment of a guardian with the power to make a decision authorizing medication-when in the best interests of a patient who lacks the mental competence to make such a decision. E. g., Ala. Code §§26-2A-102(a), 26-2A105, 26-2A-108 (West 1992); Alaska Stat. §§ 13.26.105(a), 13.26.116(b) (2002); Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 14-5303, 14-5312 (West 1995); Ark. Code Ann. §§ 28-65-205,28-65-301 (1987). And courts, in civil proceedings, may authorize involuntary medication where the patient's failure to accept treatment threatens injury to the patient or others. See,
e. g., 28 CFR § 549.43 (2002); cf. 18 U. S. C. § 4246.<<<
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/539/166/#top
There's no guarantee of success in court, of course, but the right to refuse medication is not an absolute right.