I'm going to refrain from calling you names, which is very easy to do. So I urge you to stop labeling or calling people names. Just state your case.
Show us some proofs or examples of signs that companies are moving toward INTERALLY-powered speakers?
You see B&W, Revel, KEF, Focal, Paradigm, Dynaudio, Martin-Logan, RBH, and all the big brands moving toward internally-powered speakers?
I love RBH. Some of their HIGH-END FLAGSHIPS are available as ACTIVE, but the amps/DSP are EXTERNAL.
The 100% active Linkiwitz Orion was made a long, long time ago and the amps/DSP are EXTENAL.
NHT had a little active speaker system about 30 years ago, and the amp/DSP was also EXTERNAL.
Legacy Audio has some internally-powered speakers, but they are very expensive - like $20K, which most people can't afford.
So don't tell me that $20K powered speakers are going to SAVE people money in the long-run.
Yes, there are some "affordable" internally-powered speakers from RBH and other brands, but they are generally twice the cost of similar passive speakers.
Please give ALL OF US examples of the signs that all these speaker companies moving towards internally-powered speakers.
It's cool you think all speakers should be internally powered.
But Don't talk about what YOU think SHOULD happen. Just stick to the FACTS and talk about what is happening or has been happening.
Another thing. I've been CALLING YOU OUT on this subject many times and you chose to IGNORE it. Why do you say that having more amps inside AVR is bad, but turn around and say that having more amps inside speakers is GOOD?
Are you saying that having FOUR AMPS INSIDE EACH SPEAKER is better than having the amps inside the AVR?