Masimo/Sound United Dealer Portal now says “HARMAN”

TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Audioholic Jedi
I'm going to refrain from calling you names, which is very easy to do. So I urge you to stop labeling or calling people names. Just state your case.

Show us some proofs or examples of signs that companies are moving toward INTERALLY-powered speakers?

You see B&W, Revel, KEF, Focal, Paradigm, Dynaudio, Martin-Logan, RBH, and all the big brands moving toward internally-powered speakers?

I love RBH. Some of their HIGH-END FLAGSHIPS are available as ACTIVE, but the amps/DSP are EXTERNAL.

The 100% active Linkiwitz Orion was made a long, long time ago and the amps/DSP are EXTENAL.

NHT had a little active speaker system about 30 years ago, and the amp/DSP was also EXTERNAL.

Legacy Audio has some internally-powered speakers, but they are very expensive - like $20K, which most people can't afford.

So don't tell me that $20K powered speakers are going to SAVE people money in the long-run.

Yes, there are some "affordable" internally-powered speakers from RBH and other brands, but they are generally twice the cost of similar passive speakers.

Please give ALL OF US examples of the signs that all these speaker companies moving towards internally-powered speakers.

It's cool you think all speakers should be internally powered.

But Don't talk about what YOU think SHOULD happen. Just stick to the FACTS and talk about what is happening or has been happening.

Another thing. I've been CALLING YOU OUT on this subject many times and you chose to IGNORE it. Why do you say that having more amps inside AVR is bad, but turn around and say that having more amps inside speakers is GOOD?

Are you saying that having FOUR AMPS INSIDE EACH SPEAKER is better than having the amps inside the AVR?
I think now that active speakers will spread up from the bottom end of the market. I should have realized this sooner, as a sound bar is an active speaker.

I was really impressed with Shady's review of this Kanto active speaker which sells for $700.00. It is clearly a very good speaker. Better yet it connects directly to a TV HDMI output. So there is no need for an AVR.

We all accept active subs, as a passive crossover at sub frequencies is a nightmare and a very poor performer indeed.

So I see potential demand for good systems that can be connected directly to a TV HDMI output like a soundbar.

This approach has the potential to return good audio to many homes. It will greatly reduce the demand for AVRs, and may see them the endangered species list.

Active speakers are actually nothing new. I installed a fully active system in a large hall as far back as 1974. My main listening systems have been partially active since 1976. So this is not novel technology. However zero phase active crossovers and class D amps will be the game changer that sweeps away the old.
 
everettT

everettT

Audioholic Spartan
However zero phase active crossovers and class D amps will be the game changer that sweeps away the old.
This and near infinite crossover slopes will allow designers so much flexibility. Genelec and Neumann have it down to an exact science.
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Audioholic Jedi
This and near infinite crossover slopes will allow designers so much flexibility. Genelec and Neumann have it down to an exact science.
Exact;y, but my change of view is that from a mass marketing point of view, I think it will be from the bottom up and not top down. We will see.
 
D

dlaloum

Audioholic Chief
I think now that active speakers will spread up from the bottom end of the market. I should have realized this sooner, as a sound bar is an active speaker.

I was really impressed with Shady's review of this Kanto active speaker which sells for $700.00. It is clearly a very good speaker. Better yet it connects directly to a TV HDMI output. So there is no need for an AVR.

We all accept active subs, as a passive crossover at sub frequencies is a nightmare and a very poor performer indeed.

So I see potential demand for good systems that can be connected directly to a TV HDMI output like a soundbar.

This approach has the potential to return good audio to many homes. It will greatly reduce the demand for AVRs, and may see them the endangered species list.

Active speakers are actually nothing new. I installed a fully active system in a large hall as far back as 1974. My main listening systems have been partially active since 1976. So this is not novel technology. However zero phase active crossovers and class D amps will be the game changer that sweeps away the old.
I like to refer people who think active speakers are a new thing, to the Revox Agora B speakers of the early 1980's ...

Great speaker if you can find one in good condition too...
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
I think now that active speakers will spread up from the bottom end of the market. I should have realized this sooner, as a soundbar is an active speaker.

So I see potential demand for good systems that can be connected directly to a TV HDMI output like a soundbar.
So a bunch of people (who don't want to spend a bunch of money) buy CHEAP soundbars, and you extrapolate that to mean the audio market is moving toward INTERNALLY-POWERED HIGH-END speakers? o_O

Speakers from B&W, Revel, KEF, RBH, Focal, Dynaudio, Martin-Logan, Paradigm, etc. that would cost thousands more money than passive speakers?

To even say "soundbar" in the same sentence as "Active Speaker" is a total disrespect for active speakers. :D

Think about this. Audiophiles who own expensive speakers, AVP, amps ABSOLUTELY HATE things like Soundbars. If they associate soundbars with active speakers, they may also hate active speakers. They may say, "So you expect us to give up our high-end speakers, AVP, and amps to buy some active speakers like some soundbars?" :D

How about this. I have this outrageous radical idea that might cause a huge stir - how about if these companies offer BOTH Passive and Active speakers and subwoofers like RBH Sound? Huh? How about giving people a CHOICE?

You want small speakers or large speakers? Subs or no subs? Passive speakers and subs or active? You want AVR or AVP? You want external amps or not? How about you have the freedom of choice? Isn't that the AMERICAN way? :D
 
Last edited:
H

highfigh

Seriously, I have no life.
I think now that active speakers will spread up from the bottom end of the market. I should have realized this sooner, as a sound bar is an active speaker.

I was really impressed with Shady's review of this Kanto active speaker which sells for $700.00. It is clearly a very good speaker. Better yet it connects directly to a TV HDMI output. So there is no need for an AVR.

We all accept active subs, as a passive crossover at sub frequencies is a nightmare and a very poor performer indeed.

So I see potential demand for good systems that can be connected directly to a TV HDMI output like a soundbar.

This approach has the potential to return good audio to many homes. It will greatly reduce the demand for AVRs, and may see them the endangered species list.

Active speakers are actually nothing new. I installed a fully active system in a large hall as far back as 1974. My main listening systems have been partially active since 1976. So this is not novel technology. However zero phase active crossovers and class D amps will be the game changer that sweeps away the old.
Does the dealer where you bought the Marantz AVPs sell KEF? Have you listened to their active speakers?
 
everettT

everettT

Audioholic Spartan
Does the dealer where you bought the Marantz AVPs sell KEF? Have you listened to their active speakers?
I thought the LS60 sounded great and was impressed with it's low frequency extension, definitely a value at 5k and even more so on the used market going for around 3k, IMHO and based on the LS50 2 cost at 2k.
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top