Odious or not doesn't mean you the defendant get ALL of his wealth. In court I'd like to see psychological and financial proof that justify the amounts being sued for. Err I hope that's what the court does. The Jones court is iffy to me because it feels like these are corporate amounts being applied. Jones does not have the viewer reach or assets I assume to total these numbers. On the other hand, Faux has the revenue and viewer reach to justify hefty prices associated with defamation. But a $1 billion dollars on Jones? Yeah you outline how the psychological trauma caused you to lose your job, house, business, friendships, standing etc. But does anyone even know who Alex Jones is let alone the scale of media damage. $110 million in one case? Well I hope they have the receipts cause that's like winning the lottery. The vague term of defamation on an individual doesn't make me automatically assume the fine is within reason.