By the way, your home brew "crime against humanity" legal theory is nothing but a fantasy. I suppose you fancy yourself to be a great legal eagle of sorts who has discovered a legal theory that has been overlooked by every lawyer and legal scholar in the country for the past 70 years?
Does this strike you as being realistic? Do you want to join the rest of us here in the real world? Perhaps you prefer Wonderland?
First, this may come as a surprise to you, but the U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land in the United States:
Article VI
- Clause 2
- This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
constitution.congress.gov
For 100 years, courts have consistently held that vaccine mandates are constitutional:
>>>Not Breaking News: Mandatory Vaccination Has Been Constitutional for Over a Century
While there is a lot of sound and fury these days about mandatory vaccination against the COVID-19 virus, it should ultimately signify nothing. Mandatory vaccination is 100 percent constitutional and has been for over a century. In
Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC, 562 U.S. 223 (2011), Justice Antonin Scalia stated that “the elimination of communicable diseases through vaccination became one of the greatest achievements of public health in the 20th century.”
Id. at 226 (2011) (quotation marks and footnote omitted). Justice Breyer, concurring, agreed. “[R]outine vaccination is one of the most spectacularly effective public health initiatives this country has ever undertaken.”
Id. at 245.
Bruesewitz effectively eliminated product liability litigation involving vaccines.<<<
The same arguments we see today thus failed over a century ago in Jacobson and vaccine resistance need not be tolerated when it allows disease to spread and imperil others.
www.americanbar.org
So, with that as background, let's take a look at what actually happens here in the real world when someone alleges in court that vaccine mandates are a violation of the Nuremberg Code.
Do you have any guesses? Come on there legal eagle, let's hear your prediction.
Let's cut to the chase. The judge tells them they're idiots:
View attachment 52359
docs.justia.com