I guess you do not understand what the term "misleading" and "out of context means". Let me show you. This is the original post you are referring to above but that is not the one you quoted. Here is the first post of the thread.
Let us say that hypothetically speaking one just got a beautiful pair of LS-6es...
Let us also say that one is truly blown away with the amazing bass and exceptionally natural and beautiful midrange....
Let us also also say that one is experiencing airy, three dimensional highs, that are at the moment brittle and a little harsh....
Would we assume that this is break in issue (assuming as well that we believe in break in)?
Anyone with LSs want to chime in ....
...hypothetically of course."
Get my point. This is an example of out of context and misleading. When I questioned that thread initially I said "I don't see any resolution in this link. Its a hypothetical thread about the OP receiving a pair of speakers? Am I missing something here?" A very reasonable question to a very serious issue. I honestly thought the thread was a joke at first until you clarified it in another post.
Also if there is no possible way of somone being confused from reading that thread on another forum why wouldn't you just quote the first post of the thread in response? (thats rhetorical)