nhpm510 said:
I got my hands on a new A500 and a Rotel 1070.
...
I gotta say I liked the sound of the Rotel better as it seemed richer and fuller.
As Beppe alluded to, the voices sounded a little "thin" with the A500 versus other amps.
Now, is it fair to compare a $700 amp with the A500? Probably not, but will I more than likey go for a used Rotel over a new A-500. Probably so..more unscientific testing hopefully over the weekend.
...
Rgds,
PM
Your impression mirrors mine own Sir.
Nevertheless before shelving this very remarkable product (I am referring to its price/performance ratio) I would try to mate it with a tube preamp.
Tube preamps have usually a softer sound that could tame some hardness/harshness in the A500's sound.
Tubes are also known for adding "body" to human voices.
IMHO this hardness of the A500 is due to a too small capacitance (low quality also?) in the power supply.
I underline that I am using quite demanding speakers (Dynaudio).
An Adcom GFA 545 has already failed to drive them adequately.
I always look at filter caps in the power supply as lungs.
Also solid core cables as interconnects could help.
Problem is the low (about 10kohm) input impedance of the A500.
I am pretty sure that an A500 driven by a nice cathode-follower could gain a lot in "musicality".
Thank you and kind regards,
beppe
P.S. Reading the title of the thread " ... Objective Test Results " I understand that I have gone off-topic quite a bit.
Please tell me if I have to redirect myself to the other thread talking about the A500 in more generic terms.
My impressions are everything but "objective".