Arendal Sound 1723 1S & 1V Subwoofer Review

[kini]

Also the arendals have flatter response and increased low end

They also have lower group delay. Some mention that the SVS subs are harder to integrate with their speakers when it comes to music

 

[XaVierDK]

They also have lower group delay. Some mention that the SVS subs are harder to integrate with their speakers when it comes to music

That seems more like a problem with compensating for the delay from DSP, which is trivial with AVRs and room-correction, but might be difficult with music-only systems. Arendal might have somewhat lower delay in that regard than SVS, without knowing for sure.

 

[everettT]

They also have lower group delay. Some mention that the SVS subs are harder to integrate with their speakers when it comes to music

Are those the people that want a high pass on their mains?

 

[Pete T James]

When the review gives 4/5 for dynamic range what does this mean in terms of subwoofers? What does it need to get 5/5 and what difference would it make?

 

[shadyJ]

When the review gives 4/5 for dynamic range what does this mean in terms of subwoofers? What does it need to get 5/5 and what difference would it make?

It's more of a rating of the kind of output it can produce relative to its price class and size class. To get 5/5, it would have to equal the highest output subs in its segment. The Arendal subs do very well in terms of dynamic range, but there are other models that can get you more SPL for the dollar.

 

[Pete T James]

Ah ok cool, so it's nothing to do with the character of the sound. I have a small room but I want the house and techno kicks and bass to hit you in the chest and rumble your throat like a high end club system like Funktion One. A physical experience. My room is: 153 ft2 / 1260 ft3. A lot of things are tricky to get in the UK but it's relatively easy to get SVS, Arendal. I could import RSL or JTR (fortune) but then I guess I have no customer support or warranty. Perlisten are available but are also a fortune. Someone recommended 2x REL HT/1510 Predator Subwoofers. I do like to have XLRs if possible.

I was analyzing what I listen too and yeah most of the hard hitting low end is at 40-50hz. There is bass down to 10hz but by the time it reaches 30hz it's dropped to -36db.

I have a small room but I'm considering large to extreme subs - I'm not sure if that's wise but I don't want to be lacking anything either. I want it to play up to100db long term (or however much is necessary)although most of my sensible listening is 85db to 90db. I need it to be flat for studio work and prefer no latency or unnoticeable latency.

 

[shadyJ]

Ah ok cool, so it's nothing to do with the character of the sound. I have a small room but I want the house and techno kicks and bass to hit you in the chest and rumble your throat like a high end club system like Funktion One. A physical experience. My room is: 153 ft2 / 1260 ft3. A lot of things are tricky to get in the UK but it's relatively easy to get SVS, Arendal. I could import RSL or JTR (fortune) but then I guess I have no customer support or warranty. Perlisten are available but are also a fortune. Someone recommended 2x REL HT/1510 Predator Subwoofers. I do like to have XLRs if possible.

I was analyzing what I listen too and yeah most of the hard hitting low end is at 40-50hz. There is bass down to 10hz but by the time it reaches 30hz it's dropped to -36db.

I have a small room but I'm considering large to extreme subs - I'm not sure if that's wise but I don't want to be lacking anything either. I want it to play up to100db long term (or however much is necessary)although most of my sensible listening is 85db to 90db. I need it to be flat for studio work and prefer no latency or unnoticeable latency.

Firstly, the flatness of the response will have everything to do with the room and nothing to do with the subwoofer in practice. Room acoustics mangle low-frequency response. The best way to address this is to use multiple subs with placements that net the flattest response, and then use equalization to tame the peaks in the response.

Arendal and SVS are both good brands. The REL HT1510 is good too, and probably the only REL sub I would recommend for performance for the dollar.

 

[Pete T James]

I'm in the process of measuring my room and working out what I need to do to get my room sounding decent. I'm thinking of building 15cm bass traps but yes the sub region is still tricky. I don't know if I will have to resort to buying membrane traps or multiple subs.

Have you any thoughts on the size of sub / subs I should be looking at? I'm considering the SVS PB17-Ultra / SVS PB 5000 and 1723 S 2V or 1723 1V but i'm not sure if they are complete overkill and might end up sounding worse than a smaller cheaper sub in my room. Even the cheapest Arendal 1861 1V are 'certified large' when my room is only small. I don't want to go too small and regret it though or too big for no reason. I don't own a sub so I don't have much reference of what some of these 10 or 12 inch subs can do.

However maybe my intended listening levels and desired result is unusually extreme. Do I need huge subs to achieve a physical club sound at home? If I do end up needing 2 subs I The PB-17 and 1723 2V are really too expensive to get two of them.

Getting 2x 1961 Subwoofer 1V is very budget friendly but don't have the XLR. Same with the Rel HT1205 and I don't really like that the REL uses vinyl.

If I do have to buy 2 I think REL HT/1510 MKII or 1723 1V might be as much as I am willing to spend.

Have you ever tested or come across the Adam Sub 12 or Sub 15 or Neumann, Focal and Genelec subs?
They are easy for me to get in the UK. I might be able to get hold of the JL Audio E10 / E112 or Fathom 10 v2.

Thanks,
Pete