OK, what, exactly, makes them Nazi? Apparently they identified themselves that way....
lovinthehd Audioholic Jedi Yesterday at 11:31 AM #21 highfigh said: OK, what, exactly, makes them Nazi? Click to expand... Apparently they identified themselves that way....
highfigh said: OK, what, exactly, makes them Nazi? Click to expand... Apparently they identified themselves that way....
mtrycrafts Seriously, I have no life. Yesterday at 12:45 PM #22 highfigh said: No freaking idea but I suspect some kind of gang activity. Click to expand... Where did he store all of that at 13?
highfigh said: No freaking idea but I suspect some kind of gang activity. Click to expand... Where did he store all of that at 13?
mtrycrafts Seriously, I have no life. Yesterday at 12:48 PM #23 j_garcia said: It said many of them are ghost guns, meaning not much traceability. This is one grey area they need to close the loop on. Click to expand... And the chances of that passing is close to 0.  After all, we have a 2nd amendment that seems to be absolute except machineguns. But we have bump stocks.
j_garcia said: It said many of them are ghost guns, meaning not much traceability. This is one grey area they need to close the loop on. Click to expand... And the chances of that passing is close to 0.  After all, we have a 2nd amendment that seems to be absolute except machineguns. But we have bump stocks.
everettT Audioholic Spartan Yesterday at 2:10 PM #24 mtrycrafts said: And the chances of that passing is close to 0.  After all, we have a 2nd amendment that seems to be absolute except machineguns. But we have bump stocks. Click to expand... Even fully automatic weapons are legal, one just needs a class 3 FFL attachment to sell or buy and carries hefty requirements.
mtrycrafts said: And the chances of that passing is close to 0.  After all, we have a 2nd amendment that seems to be absolute except machineguns. But we have bump stocks. Click to expand... Even fully automatic weapons are legal, one just needs a class 3 FFL attachment to sell or buy and carries hefty requirements.
mtrycrafts Seriously, I have no life. Yesterday at 2:21 PM #25 everettT said: Even fully automatic weapons are legal, one just needs a class 3 FFL attachment to sell or buy and carries hefty requirements. Click to expand... So, it limits who can have them. Interesting. A regulated 2nd amendment right. Wonder if a modern gatling gun can be had as well like in the Accountant. ps. I keep seeing "before 19 May 1986." Last edited: Yesterday at 2:33 PM
everettT said: Even fully automatic weapons are legal, one just needs a class 3 FFL attachment to sell or buy and carries hefty requirements. Click to expand... So, it limits who can have them. Interesting. A regulated 2nd amendment right. Wonder if a modern gatling gun can be had as well like in the Accountant. ps. I keep seeing "before 19 May 1986."
everettT Audioholic Spartan Yesterday at 11:02 PM #26 mtrycrafts said: So, it limits who can have them. Interesting. A regulated 2nd amendment right. Wonder if a modern gatling gun can be had as well like in the Accountant. ps. I keep seeing "before 19 May 1986." Click to expand... Yup, if you have the licence you can pretty much own type of firearm. You will get frequent checks from ATF, along with a laundry list of requirements but you can own that Gatling gun.
mtrycrafts said: So, it limits who can have them. Interesting. A regulated 2nd amendment right. Wonder if a modern gatling gun can be had as well like in the Accountant. ps. I keep seeing "before 19 May 1986." Click to expand... Yup, if you have the licence you can pretty much own type of firearm. You will get frequent checks from ATF, along with a laundry list of requirements but you can own that Gatling gun.
D Dude#1279435 Audioholic Warlord Today at 12:32 AM #27 mtrycrafts said: So, it limits who can have them. Interesting. A regulated 2nd amendment right. Wonder if a modern gatling gun can be had as well like in the Accountant. ps. I keep seeing "before 19 May 1986." Click to expand... Read along the lines a group was trying to get MG's on the basis of constitutional rights maybe. The oppositions strategy to prevent this was to delay by not responding or something or other. Wish I could remember where I found that. Something like if they responded that would trigger a case I'm not exactly sure. I also believe regarding FRT's Clarence Thomas made them legal based on the original language of the Constitution or something like that.
mtrycrafts said: So, it limits who can have them. Interesting. A regulated 2nd amendment right. Wonder if a modern gatling gun can be had as well like in the Accountant. ps. I keep seeing "before 19 May 1986." Click to expand... Read along the lines a group was trying to get MG's on the basis of constitutional rights maybe. The oppositions strategy to prevent this was to delay by not responding or something or other. Wish I could remember where I found that. Something like if they responded that would trigger a case I'm not exactly sure. I also believe regarding FRT's Clarence Thomas made them legal based on the original language of the Constitution or something like that.
