Also AcuDef has yet to tell me where the converter is in the chain with his 990. Perhaps he doesn't understand what I'm talking about.
...or perhaps he doesn't care.
I have AVR-3310 access and I can pull the analog section out and compare the differences with the Kingwa piece if you guys like!
You can identify it in a < 0.1db level matched ABX?
As for GranteedEV, stop wasting your time? You just joined the conversation!
Thread Title - ATI AT2000 amps
BTW I take it you work in this field as well GranteedEV.
What's it to you which field I work in? This is a hobbyist website last I checked.
Do you only sell box store AVRs IE do you work at Bestbuy?
Describe a box store AVR for me please. In terms of what you hear from it.
Well you should because it's obvious like walter there you have no faith in the products you sell.
huh? What products do I sell?
I wonder how your customers would feel if they knew that you guys think most of your product is BS that you just sold for 4 figures.
As wonderful as yourself, looking at electronics schematics to describe psychoacoustics. It's obvious from your handle that you have obvious biases that suggest you're more interested in stuff, "Audioholics don't care about but DIY Audio does. because they're there for the building aspect not the listening aspect" Audioholics are interested in sound waves, not electrical signals, although there's people here who strongly understand the relevant electrical concepts and the associated psychoacoutsics, people like TLS Guy, PENG, Gene.
So I take it your not even willing to try something different like the Ref 10.2?
It's not about willingness. It's about reason. Show us
why he should, with perceptual relevance as the focal point of that reason. "X has a better schematic than Y" (and in this case, "because I'm smart and you're not") sure isn't exciting anyone.
I WILL RUN DOWN THE ROAD NUDE WITH AN AUDIOHOLICS LOGO PAINTED ON MY CHEST
O Lord; no. Besides we have Alex for that, and he's even losing weight for the running part.
If you don't understand what I'm asking then please ask me to explain it!
okay. Explain why you need your eyes to listen. BEcause that's what a schematic or an "internals pic" is a form of - sighted listening.
You keep talking measurements... there are many ways to measure electronics and acoustics... to what metrology are you referring to?
Electrical/Analog
Fs?
THD?
RMS?
IMD?
Crosstalk?
Noise?
Dynamic range and SNR?
CMRR if balanced/dual differential?
transient response IE slew rate and rise time?
output impedance and dampening factor?
DIGITAL
Jitter?
Sample rate?
Bit Depth?
Sample accuracy/synchronization IE clock recovery?
Differential non-linearity?
Integral non-linearity?
...Show us
whatever measurement you, O Great Teacher, know and can scientifically prove is perceptually relevant to Hi Fidelity sound reproduction, which the "big box AVRs" are woefully inadequate in, whereas your schematics are clearly excellent in.
But please, do it in your own thread instead of hijacking this one.