S

soapboxpreacher

Junior Audioholic
Got the Rhythmik FV12 today. Hooked it up to go side by side against the velodynes (Gonna test the legend against as well)...guess what...the velodynes killed it! I cant even express how frustrated and disappointed I am! I was expecting this to be a better sub...and it wasnt. I watch the scene from Avatar where the mech is walking in front of Sully. With the Velodynes you could hear each step with decent authority. As he walks past him the mech comes to a stop...the rythmik did not produce any lows were as the velodynes did...what the hell! I am talking about a 23 year old servo sub here!!! Shouldnt todays new improved technology surpass this dinosaur?? This is my initial listen..only an hour or so...and I watched that scene 7x with each sub, adjusted the levels to help the FV12. So many spoke sooo highly of this sub...it must have ruined my expectation which apparently are quite high. I am shocked!! I will say this the FV12 is tight...but the velodynes is tighter. It is responsive...but once again the velodynes is more responsive. The scene where the giant dump truck with arrows in the tires shock me, the room, throughout the entire scene with the velodynes...with the FV12...not so much! I am beginning to question the recommendations...for I dont believe many even have this sub. It isnt a bad sub and I still need more time but once again like the legend the range of bass the velodynes produces is far and away better...it lacks some of the ultra lows but it covers and its presents is far more obvious throughout the 25-100hz range...the other...no! More impact (punch), more presences, and better response over the 25-100hz range. I hear thinks (and feel) with the velodynes that the other cant seem to do...I am baffled to say the least!! A bit pissed off as well! I cant believe how effortlessly the velodynes produces bass even at low volumes!! Yes listen preferences are subjective but I dont think anyone who would listen (and I welcome anyone) that they wouldnt come to the same conclusion...watching scenes several times you know where a sound is and where it is not...more over if one is missing from another. Even my wife and son said they could hear (and feel) the difference...such as when things were missing. I dont care if someone has a meter on it or scope the product...your ears dont lie! I need more testing but this is a little disappointing. To Rythmiks defense...brian did recommend the f12...but that is some bigger bucks...I am in a whole other arena of subs at that price!

Oh and I dont believe there is anything wrong with the FV12...it does produce the lows but not like my now...I believe to be vintage Velodynes!
 
F

FirstReflection

AV Rant Co-Host
Man oh man. Very sorry to hear about your disappointment there, soapbox! I completely sympathize with your frustration. Always sucks big time to not have your expectations met :(

I believe that what happened here, at least in my case, was that I didn't know the full capabilities of your existing Velodyne subs. I saw your $500 budget request and read what you were saying about you feeling that it lacked the really deepest bass and jumped straight into recommending what I still believe is the best subwoofer that $500 can buy. That said, if your Velodyne cost over $1000 - and that was quite a few years ago - then it's a bit like a sub that would cost a fair bit more than $1000 today. There's just no way around physics. Reproducing bass hasn't changed over the years. It's all a matter of moving air and that simply takes surface area, excursion and power to make it happen. No magic. Just basic mechanics.

So I, for one, completely underestimated what your old Velodyne was actually producing, and that's my bad and I apologize for that. My only defense is that it's an old enough model that I honestly didn't know anything about it. I should have looked it up. But I just saw your budget and jumped straight in based on that. I did a poor job of gathering the right information and I do apologize for that. No excuse except for haste and some bad assumptions.

Sadly, the only fix for you is going to be to return the Legend and FV12 and to save up a fairly big chunk of change for a superior sub. I will tell you plainly that if the FV12 disappointed you, you're not going to find a different sub at $500 that's going to be an improvement. You simply need a better sub than $500 can buy. And I'm afraid there's no way around that.

My honest inclination is to go back to something that I said previously, which is that if you have an FV12 and want to upgrade, you might as well go whole
hog, save up, and get yourself an SVSound Ultra. That said, the least expensive current Ultra is the PC13-Ultra DSP cylinder, which would set you back $1700 (although at least that includes shipping ;) ). The PB13-Ultra box version is $2000.

I am at the point in my experience where anything less than an SVS Ultra doesn't really "do it" for me, personally. Perhaps that is where you are as well, but you just weren't aware of it. I still find great pleasure in subs like the FV12 or the insanely cheap Onkyo SKW-204 because I've been through the whole gauntlet of subwoofers at every price level and I still get a kick out of discovering subs like those that hit above their price bracket. But there's no magic. Money is a restriction and there's only so much that can be done with components at a given price point. You simply need better than what a $500 budget will allow.
 
j_garcia

j_garcia

Audioholic Jedi
There are a few things here: 1) did you calibrate with each sub? If they aren't set to the same level, you are not comparing apples to oranges. 2) Just because the velo was giving you more "sound" does not mean it is playing accurately, though that is not an immediate assumption because the old Velo servo subs are quite good. Quite often when people move from one sub to one that is cleaner, you will often hear that they are dissatisfied with the results. You may want to give it some time and see if it grows on you. I will give up some output for cleaner sound personally, but if it doesn't dig deep enough, there's little you can do about that.

I wouldn't say you'd need to step up to an Ultra, but perhaps at least something like an Epik Empire instead.
 
S

soapboxpreacher

Junior Audioholic
I did cal with each sub. The Pioneer allows you to save each cal so you can load them when you want. The Cals were not that perfect...I had to adjust each one to my liking...for example the center was never loud enough and the wife always complained that she could not hear them talking on the lower level volume scenes (Pioneer seemed to get this right where I had to adjust the denon up). Also the rears needed to be dial up on the pioneer substantially! They but their processing with dolby digital was not the same as the denon...even dialed up the denon produced more effects and sound in the rears (I only have 5.1 setup). As for the lows...the denon completely excels here. It does a substantially better job then the pioneer...I had to mess with the pioneer a ton and still could never get it to produce the bass like the denon...which was fuller and more present...without having to dial the levels up...this shocked me for at low volumes you still got a nice touch of bass...denon does a brilliant job on the sound. I was hoping the pioneer (VSX-1121) was going to be better for I got if for 150 less and it is THX, Airplay, network, streaming...it is feature packed...and it was only 399!!!!!! The setup with mcacc on the pioneer seems more substantial but I still needed to adjust it. Tonight I will play more. It is fun and I love testing this stuff...I just cant believe the difference of this stuff. If I didnt have this stuff side by side I would have never know what I was missing. It is great to have a reference to have as a benchmark to base this on.

As for accuracy...I dont think that is an issue...it is the fact that one seems to produce certain level and frequencies that the other just misses. My early conclusion is these bigger subs that concentrate on the lows past 20hz tend to have gaps in there mid-bass. My Velo is effortless and the presences of bass in the areas where bass is most common in movies (25...maybe 30-70hz) it abilities exceed those of the others. I might not hit those ultra lows but what % of a movie makes up these ultra lows? Probably not that much...when you compare overall bass response in a movie probably consists of 40hz as the most common frequency. This obsession with ultra low might miss the most common...I know the frequency responses show +/- something throughout the entire range but in-room the results are real-world...and to the ear that is what matters. My velo cannont handle high volume levels like the other 2 subs but I typically dont listen to stuff at high volumes...for one my neighbors would hate me and too I dont need 110dB SPL...a good system should sound good at low volume levels as it does at high...my system is enjoyable with the velodynes at low levels...this sub is simply better then I thought. It isnt about taste on this...for you can hear the difference. I took this for granted!
 
S

soapboxpreacher

Junior Audioholic
There are a few things here: 1) did you calibrate with each sub? If they aren't set to the same level, you are not comparing apples to oranges. 2) Just because the velo was giving you more "sound" does not mean it is playing accurately, though that is not an immediate assumption because the old Velo servo subs are quite good. Quite often when people move from one sub to one that is cleaner, you will often hear that they are dissatisfied with the results. You may want to give it some time and see if it grows on you. I will give up some output for cleaner sound personally, but if it doesn't dig deep enough, there's little you can do about that.

I wouldn't say you'd need to step up to an Ultra, but perhaps at least something like an Epik Empire instead.
I hear what you are saying but...it is more about what is missing when you listen to the Legend or the FV12. They do not produce the same audible levels that the velodyne did. What is so ironic is that the velodynes was dialed down 1/3 power...where as the other were 2/3. But it was the frequencies that the others didnt produce. The Legend seems to go the lowest of the group...but misses the mid-bass...just like the FV12. The FV12 is the 2nd tightest sub and it is accurate and somewhat responsive...2nd again in response. The Legend seems to have more output below 25hz (this is a guess...but it certainly shakes and rattles the walls where as it is not as easy to hear at those low hz). So this is a mixed bag for the 2 newcomers. The FV12 is the biggest of the subs as well!! It is simply huge! Next to my RF52II it makes these speakers look like sticks next to it fat, tall profile. Once again...my disclaimer...it is still early. But of the 2 new subs it is a tie between the 2 of them. I like the size and output of the legend and the low frequency as well. Where I like the responsiveness and tightness of the FV12. But my Velo slaps both of these 2 around...it only misses the ultra lows hz which dont make up enough of everyday tv and movies to make me sacrifice what it does substantially better. I will post pictures...I just need the time to get it all done. My family/living room has 3 subs siting in it...it is quite a sight! But it isnt obstructing anything. To be continued.
 
j_garcia

j_garcia

Audioholic Jedi
Neither of the subs mentioned are bottom dwellers, and likely the Velos have circuitry and tuning to extend their bottom end enough to give you that satisfaction. Now that we know that you ARE more interested in extension, the recommendations would be different IMO. Perhaps something more along the lines of an SVS PB-12 or a HSU VTF-3, which will give you the kind of extension you are looking for. The Legend and the Rythmik are more likely to perform better above 30Hz as you've noted. Yes, most sound in movies do not dip much below around 40Hz, however when you do NOT hit those 20hz notes, you WILL notice it if you are used to it.

That doesn't sound right to me either, since both of those subs are actually KNOWN for their above 30Hz performance. That's what I mean by the fact that the Velos may not be giving you accurate sound, though it is a sound you've become used to. It can also be placement within the room, as that can dramatically affect the sound also. Either way, it still sounds like you are after a different sub, or stick with Velo :)

I went from a very low tuned sub (17Hz with a filter at 14Hz) to my current Empire and I did notice there was less extension for sure, so I had to get used to the new sub. I don't miss that extension anymore :)
 
Last edited:
S

soapboxpreacher

Junior Audioholic
The FV12 is a ported with a 300RMS Amp, it has a measurement that is down to 18 +/- 3 db. I believe it is a lower deweller than my velo and so is the Legend...but what they miss is the mid-low to mid-bass. The Velo doesnt have the low extension like the others but it has the mid-low - mid bass the other dont...which makes up of more of what you hear then the 20hz realm. So this is my issue...I believe these subs concentrate on more of the low hz then the velo...and since the low hz make up less of the overall sound track in a movie it isnt as noticeable as the mid-low to mid bass parts. You follow me?
 
j_garcia

j_garcia

Audioholic Jedi
I do follow you and what I am saying is that the sound that you are used to from the Velo may simply be a BUMP in the mid-bass that is not what would be considered accurate. You have become accustomed to that sound so the new subs don't sound "right" to you, despite the fact that you may be hearing what is technically cleaner sound. It is personal preference, so if you don't like the way the new subs sound, then you'll have to find one that meets your needs. I am also not saying that there's anything wrong about what you hear.
 
Last edited:
its phillip

its phillip

Audioholic Ninja
I think he should get some cheap measurement gear to see what he's getting from each of his subs :)
 
K

kini

Full Audioholic
The FV12 is a ported with a 300RMS Amp, it has a measurement that is down to 18 +/- 3 db. I believe it is a lower deweller than my velo and so is the Legend...but what they miss is the mid-low to mid-bass. The Velo doesnt have the low extension like the others but it has the mid-low - mid bass the other dont...which makes up of more of what you hear then the 20hz realm. So this is my issue...I believe these subs concentrate on more of the low hz then the velo...and since the low hz make up less of the overall sound track in a movie it isnt as noticeable as the mid-low to mid bass parts. You follow me?
I think (based on a single review though) the closest sound match you can get to your Velodyne for the $500 range would be the Cadence CSX12II or 15II
cadencesound.com/products/CSX12-Mark-II.html]CSX12[/url] Mark II - Cadence Sound Store
cadencesound.com/products/CSX15-Mark-II.html]CSX15[/url] Mark II - Cadence Sound Store
Review:- soundandvisionmag.com/article/review-cadence-csx-12-mark-ii-subwoofer?page=0,0]Review:]Review: Cadence CSX-12 Mark II Subwoofer | Sound and Vision Magazine Cadence CSX-12 Mark II Subwoofer | Sound and Vision Magazine

My first post here, but have been hanging around for a while and have been an AVS forum member for a year or so. Can't post actual links :(

At least read the review.

Gene
 
S

soapboxpreacher

Junior Audioholic
Ok spoke to brian at Rythmik....did he have some insight!! I have renewed hope. I believe it is a cancellation issue. So I will make some changes tonight and let you guys know. So no conclusion should be drawn about any subs legend or FV12 until I get this squared away. But it is strange how the velodynes seems to really shine no matter what I do with calibration...but we will see.
 
S

soapboxpreacher

Junior Audioholic
Follow up:

Spoke with Brian at Rythmik...nice guy...he had me try these settings as well as adjust my AVR-2311CI

Damping is set to: low
Freq: 14
Phase: 0
Volume/level: 2 o'clock
Xover on sub all the way up...highest hz.

All these setting were per my phone call with Brian who was very helpful..After now 3 hours of additional testing and adjusting...the FV12 or the Legend cannot hang with my old velodynes. I turned the levels way up on them to get them to perform..it did help quite a bit but I was at the 3 o'clock level on the FV12 and had my receiver sub dbs much higher then my mains, center, or surround. I certainly helped but it still fell shy of the velodynes. The velodynes is effortless! And its response is better, precision, accuracy...very good. The FV12 is quite accurate, better then the legend. But the legend has the best output as well as the best extension. It isnt in the same league as the other for accuracy or response but it can really hit low. I felt it hit lower then the FV12! It isnt as graceful and can get a little muddy but it has balls! Nor is the legend as tight! The FV12 can handle a ton of output! It is the least efficient of all. The Velodynes is the most by a mile!!! I can plug the velodynes in and have it at a 1/4 power (level) and the others cant put out that much output at 3/4 of theirs. Now there is a catch the velodynes cannot handle the ultra ultra lows at higher levels like the other 2 subs can...but I almost never listen to anything that loud so there s no point! At the moment the FV12 is in second and the legend 3rd. The FV12 is tighter, more responsive then the legend but it doesnt have the raw room filling output that the legend has! Nor the low end. The legend rattles everything that isnt bolted down. The other two arent as aggressive but they are cleaner and more accurate. I took several pictures and looking at the size of the FV12 it is ominous compared to them...and it is ugly!!! The Legend looks the nicest of all...it is also not quite as big.
 
F

FirstReflection

AV Rant Co-Host
Yuppers.

I'm very glad that you were willing to talk to Brian over at Rythmik and try out his suggestions. Also glad that you gained a little bit of improvement so that I'm sure you'll now be willing to adjust settings and placement in the future with other subs to try and get the best performance out of them.

But ultimately, it looks as though $500 just isn't going to get you what you're looking for. With the Legend and the FV12, you've seen first hand what $500 can buy you. I think you'll agree that it is not bad! But it is also still very much a limitation.

I think you'll also agree with what I was saying earlier where this sort of $500 and under budget basically demands that compromises be made. The Legend, for example, by your own listening might do very well in extension and output, but it gives up something in the way of accuracy and tightness/transient response. You'd find a very similar compromise being made with Elemental Design's less expensive subs.

I personally strongly feel that the FV12 is the best $500 sub out there right now because it delivers good accuracy, flat frequency response, good tightness/transient response, it is well engineered so that you cannot damage it or cause it to distort badly (which it sounds as though the Legend can be driven into distortion), and the FV12 plays linearly quite deep. You'd find that HSU's and Outlaws subs that are in the same price range are similar, but the FV12 plays just a touch lower than them, which, combined with its slightly lower price, is why I favor the FV12 so strongly at $500.

But you've also discovered that the compromise that the FV12 has to make is sheer output. It is a fairly light-weight 12" driver in a medium-sized box with a 300 Watt amp. There's no magic. I honestly feel that Rythmik has done about as good a job as can be done with this price point and the components that are available for such a price point. But there's just no way to get the same output from such components as what more expensive components can provide.

So, your Velodynes have the benefit of being more expensive. They also have the benefit of not even trying to reproduce the deepest bass, which frees them up to have no limitations placed on their output in the lower mid-bass where it is easier and more efficient to move the driver.

I was saying earlier that I pretty much recommend just saving up and jumping straight to an SVS Ultra. The reason I say that is because it's where I think most people who aren't satisfied with an FV12 or a slightly more expensive sub like the SVS PB12-NSD DSP ultimately WANT to go. Make no mistake, there are plenty of subs in between that are better than the FV12 and less expensive than an SVS Ultra. And it's entirely possible - highly likely, in fact - that one of those $800 - $1300 sort of price point subs will give you what you're looking for in terms of improvement over your Velodynes. But I'm just saying that if you start to eek your way towards something like a Rythmik FV15HP or SVSound PB12-Plus DSP - both of which cost just north of $1300 once you include shipping - then how much more does it really take to save up another $400 and get yourself the PC13-Ultra DSP cylinder?

I took the steps of an Axiom EP500 and a pair of Epik Sentinel subs myself. I regret both of those purchases. Not because the subs themselves are "bad". I still use the EP500 in my bedroom setup. The EP500 plays ruler flat with great transient response, but only below 90 dB or so. As soon as you start to turn up the volume with the EP500, its aggressive DSP really kicks in. It limits distortion to inaudible levels, which is great! But it also keeps the low bass output clamped down. Mid-bass output goes up, but you end up with a big, downward sloping output because the DSP is keeping the output way down on the really deep stuff. Still, at 90dB and lower output levels, the EP500 sounds really great! So it's perfect for a bedroom system where reference output levels are not necessary and I don't require the huge output.

The Epik Sentinels had similar compromises to your Legend (which I still find surprising since the Legend is sealed, but so it goes). The Sentinels could play way down low - really dig out the 20-25Hz stuff. But the biggest problem was overhang. Attack transients (the start of a note) was pretty good, but the decay of the note was WAY too long. Notes that were supposed to stop did not, and it led to an overall "muddy" sound, where notes would just overlap and run over each other. Bad transient response, in other words.

Both the EP500 and Sentinels were meant to be "upgrades" over my aging HSU VTF-3 MK2. Much like your situation here with the Velodynes, it was a disappointment because I felt that the VTF-3 MK2 was still better than either of the "upgrades" in some areas. The Sentinels played lower - no question - but not as accurately or "tightly". The EP500 was better overall so long as the volume was below 90dB. But above that, the VTF-3 MK2 remained more linear, and in my theatre, I like to hit reference levels.

The FV12 is quite similar to my old VTF-3 MK2 - or the current VTF-2 MK4, as I mentioned earlier. And, again, that's why I recommended the FV12 so strongly. Even substantially more expensive subs like the EP500 are not necessarily better in every way.

So, regardless, I'd say you're back to the position of simply being forced to spend more to get what you really want. You seem to be very used to a very, very tight and controlled sound - you'd probably favor a sealed design with a lightning fast driver. My vote would go for the SVSound SB13-Plus DSP if you don't want to go "whole hog" for an SVS Ultra. And, naturally, you've got Rythmik's larger F15HP as a fantastic alternative, although you'll have to check if those are available, as parts shortages have put many of Rythmik's models on back order for the time being.

Again, my gut reaction is to just say to save up, go "whole hog" and get yourself an SVS Ultra. The PC13-Ultra DSP cylinder at $1700 is the steal of steals. And you can put it into "sealed" mode if the ported modes don't quite satisfy your tastes. Below that price, the SVS Plus and Rythmik "15HP" models are neck-and-neck. And below THAT price point, you'd be looking at HSU/Outlaw for something like the VTF-3 MK4/Outlaw LFM-1 EX or the HSU VTF-15H, which actually might suit your tastes quite well since it excels in mid-bass output. Certainly though, just in terms of physical size, the SVS SB13-Plus DSP sealed box is the most compact and it has the "tightest" response out of basically anything below 2 grand.
 
S

soapboxpreacher

Junior Audioholic
First I agree that the FV12 is a decent sub for 500. It is not as efficient so it needs to be adjusted much higher to get a level of performance that the velodyne does at a much lower level. I have to adjust my AVR db gains on the sub up two fold as well as the level on the FV12 itself to 2/3 power. The velodyne I need to adjust the avr down and set the sub level (on the velodyne) at about 1/2 or less. Typically set the velo level on the sub at 40%...where as the FV12 is at 70%+. But still dialed significantly up the FV12 still doesnt have the performance.
 
S

soapboxpreacher

Junior Audioholic
Ok had a break thru tonight, driving home from the weekend in wisconsin with the family I thought...why not give the FV12 some hell...and really dial it up. So got home early this even and popped in Star Wars Ep II. Open scene with the chrome ship flying from orbit into the plants and landing only to get blown up. This scene as many know is a great test for a sub. I dial the db up on the sub from -6.5db (Via the MultiEQ Calibration,,,and I dialed their setting up to -6.5 because they actually had the speaker level -8.5db) and put it to -2.0db. It seems high right...it seems like it would overpower the mids and highs. Also it seems so far out of wack with the other mains, and rears they are around -7.5db (main) and -8.0db that I was questioning it. It seems strange considering the sub is only a foot off from the right main location where as the -6.5 is relative to the -7.5 of the klipsch. Since the klipsch are ultra efficient and the Velodyne is as well this leaves the FV12 kinda of at a disadvantage when I swapped out the velodyne and recalibrated...not to mention I think the MultiEQ and the MCACC on the pioneer do a bad job. With my AVR-2311CI the rears needed to be dialed way back for they overwhelmed the front where you couldnt hear anything from the front...felt as if your sound stage was behind you...this was an auto-config fail in my book. So the auto calibration via MultiEQ isnt very accurate and didnt give the best results. Strange for the auto calibation on the velodyne was better and the bass without overwhelming the high in anyway was in complete balance with everything else.

So back to my test after dialing speaker level up to -2.0db, the FV12 performed as I was hoping from day one!!! Very deep, low, powerful, tight, and impactful without overwhelming the highs from the highly efficient klipsch mains that might have made the auto call via audy. incorrect. The FV12 is very close to and equally balanced to the klipsch now...I am happy, smiling and relieved!! But this gets better...the open scene in ep II for Star Wars is one to test all subs with to see what they can take. At the end of that scene the chrome ship is blown up the explosion will bottom out the best or just flat out be missed. This scene before the FV12 (readjustment) was far less impactful then it was meant to be. This scene bottom out the velodyne easy!! It did not bottom out the FV12 at all...I cant tell you how cool this is!! For that scene has new meaning because now it can be heard the way it was intended. Other than that the FV12 is very similar to the Velodyne. The velodyne is still more detailed and elegant with the overall bass. But the FV12 is very close to being as tight and controlled I would say so close now that it is arguable to hear a difference.

My current conclusion is the FV12 want to be dialed up...more then you think!!! Doing so will show you her true colors, what she was made for! Its an animal and want to be feed yet it can take everything you toss at her! This is one tough sub!! Do not trust (and I know better for I typically dont) your audy auto setups...they make mistakes like a weatherman. I almost gave up on this sub and now I have renewed faith in it!! This is a good day! It has far more output then my velo not to mention lower end yet still maintaining accuracy the legend cant touch! For 500...I am pleased! The velo as I said is more detailed, seems a little more full and effortless. It is a hair better at lower volume levels as well. But it cant handle much compared to the FV12 and it cant go as low as I have already said! Once again to day is a good day!
 
timoteo

timoteo

Audioholic General
Thats good to hear. Im curious, did you try & turn the dBs on the Legend the same way you turned up the dBs on the FV12?

Ive never owned an Epik OR a Rythmik so i was just wondering if you tried this test with both because you said the Legend couldnt do what the FV12 could do.

I know how sensative Klipschs are my buddy has some. But before this test, did you only listen to the subs with the settings the auto cal set? Or did you ever get an SPL meter out & dial in the trim to all the speakers & sub/s?

I havent read this whole thread so i may have missed if you already answered the SPL meter part.

Its very interesting to hear your experiences with these subs. To me it sounds like your experiencing the benifits of the servo keeping distortion to a minimum. Thats a good thing. If you havent given the Legend hell yet, do it & let us know the results! Sounds like your returning it anyways so why not see what it can do as well.
 
F

FirstReflection

AV Rant Co-Host
Well there's your benefit of a well-engineered design where you can crank up the volume as high as you please, since the good design in the amp won't allow you to harm the sub :)

I agree that it's only fair to open the throttle on the Legend as well. HOWEVER, I would take the precaution of double checking with the folks over at Epik. Make sure they say there is a limiter on the Legend's amp and that it is not possible to over drive the Legend. Bottoming out a subwoofer at high volume levels is NOT fun! If it is possible to bottom out the driver, then it is possible to physically damage the subwoofer. And that would likely constitute "abuse", which is likely not covered by warranty and might void any option of returning the subwoofer.

I'm not saying this is necessarily the case. But I think it's well worth a quick phone call to Epik first just to be careful! If you were already hearing the Legend distorting and going into distress with the old, lower volume settings, trying to push out another 4-6dB might be enough to bottom out the driver if that is even possible within the design.
 
S

soapboxpreacher

Junior Audioholic
The legend adjustment on the back seems to be set at 12 oclock to 1. The amp already seems to be at a much higher level then the FV12.

Funny thing is the FV12 back plate amp and heat sinks barely get warm. Now the Legend get warm...the FV12 would be a few degrees over room temp the legend is much warmer! So I think the amp on the legend is set higher then the FV12...but the FV12 can take a beating!! it is a tough sub. I am really liking this sub!
 
timoteo

timoteo

Audioholic General
That is one of the issues i have with Epik. They get the same amps that EarthquakeSound & a couple others brands. I used to own Dual Earthquake Minime P12 subs. I really loved their performance for movies (music not as much) however, their amps used to get very hot! I never had any issues with them at all. I sold one online & the other to a good friend. Literally within a week my buddies amp stopped working. I paid shipping it back to ES. Got fixed under warranty & all is good now. But Epik also has a nasty history with amp issues. So hearing the Legend gets pretty warm is no suprise. That wears down the internal components quicker & cuts down their life span unfortunately.

Glad to hear the Ryrhmik is breaking-in. Keep pushing it & it will continue to get better till about 100hrs of use. Thats one cool thing about subs. Kinda like wine, (some women too), they get better with age! :)

Midbass response tends to improve the most. So that gap between the FV12 & Velos may just close up even more. Hopefully it catches up then you can get a second FV12 down the road....mmmm dual subs!! LOL.
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top