GoFastr

GoFastr

Full Audioholic
It's nice that you are comparing all of these settings for each sub but I think it is still apples and oranges.

You are comparing a Velo sub from back in the 90's that had an MSRP of over $800 back then and in today's money would be well over $1000 to sub's of less than $500.

I just think a better comparsion against the Velo would be against $1000-$1200 subs in today's market.

That Velo was a darn good sub back in those days built with quality components and it would need to be compared to the same level of monetary quality in today's world.

My .02
 
S

soapboxpreacher

Junior Audioholic
On a side note:

Listened to a ML Dynamo 700 at the store...not bad but doesnt have the ball or punch the FV12 or Velo. To be far it was in a big room and who know how this idiots have it setup. I checked the levels on the sub itself. I also tried it in both orientations. They had a SuperCube 2000 which was surprisingly able to fill that room very well. It didnt seem horribly loose. It was a hair boomy but it could fill the room well...level was 30%!!!!! I was shocked!!! And it is sooooo small. Nice sub it was $460 on sale! You could put that sub anywhere! Has anyone else listened to one? I am considering trying it because of the size.

For HT the Supercube isnt bad!!
 
timoteo

timoteo

Audioholic General
My good friend has the 8" Supercube in a room approx 14'x20'x8' & it holds its own for music & is decent for movies. It leaves me wanting more but duals could be ok. At $460 itd be good in a bedroom.
 
S

soapboxpreacher

Junior Audioholic
My good friend has the 8" Supercube in a room approx 14'x20'x8' & it holds its own for music & is decent for movies. It leaves me wanting more but duals could be ok. At $460 itd be good in a bedroom.
Which SuperCube? The 2000 replaced the III I believe so Definitive has reworked some stuff. I was shocked at the output from that thing. It pushs 650 watts! I do like how it isnt as location sensitive as many other subs.
 
S

soapboxpreacher

Junior Audioholic
So now that I have had the legend and the FV12 these are my observations. The Legend has tons of output!! It fills the room very easily. I honestly thought the FV12 would be better having a port...I was wrong! The Legend also goes lower. It can rattle the house like no other. It is a great looking sub as well! No hum from the Amp but the amp does get a little toasty. I like the feet and it stays put.

The FV12 is tight, responsive, and accurate! It can go lower than my Velodyne and is very close accuracy wise but you have to really dial this sub up...at 75% and I had to dial up my AVR as well. It is an excellent sounding sub. Amp runs cool and it can handle a ton of volume without distorting. But it is big and really ugly! In fact these 2 things drive me so crazy about it I dont know if I want to keep it. If I do, I will make a custom grill for it to make it look less like a sub...but it is big and I refer to it as the whale for it has a nice big blow hole in it!

Both of these subs dont quite have the subtle detail (FV12 is close and getting better) as my velodyne but my velodyne has its own set of issues...for starters and this is a big one...it has no balls! It bottoms out sooo easy! But it is tight and really sounds great at low volumes. I have actually found that the FV12 is tighter than the Velo! But the velo has 23 years of use under it!

So if you are looking for raw output, lows, the legend is a great HT sub. The price is right it looks great and can be placed in a ton of places without suffering any loss of output. Not as accurate but will move you the way the other cant! It isnt as tight or as accurate but it isnt inaccurate or loose for that matter either these other two are just an exception to the rules. The FV12 would be perfect if it wasnt so big and dumb looking! It can get to those lows but doesnt have quite the output it isnt bad on the output but compared to the legend it just cant rock the room and the floor...once again it is still impressive and no slacker at all but the legend with its 2 drivers can really hit it. However, after having the velodyne for so long, I prefer the FV12, it is such a clean sounding sub that every listen has gotten better not to mention it has worked in well.
 
Last edited:

randyc1

Enthusiast
So now that I have had the legend and the FV12 these are my observations. The Legend has tons of output!! It fills the room very easily. I honestly thought the FV12 would be better having a port...I was wrong! The Legend also goes lower. It can rattle the house like no other. It is a great looking sub as well! No hum from the Amp but the amp does get a little toasty. I like the feet and it stays put.

The FV12 is tight, responsive, and accurate! It can go lower than my Velodyne and is very close accuracy wise but you have to really dial this sub up...at 75% and I had to dial up my AVR as well. It is an excellent sounding sub. Amp runs cool and it can handle a ton of volume without distorting. But it is big and really ugly! In fact these 2 things drive me so crazy about it I dont know if I want to keep it. If I do, I will make a custom grill for it to make it look less like a sub...but it is big and I refer to it as the whale for it has a nice big blow hole in it!

Both of these subs dont quite have the subtle detail (FV12 is close and getting better) as my velodyne but my velodyne has its own set of issues...for starters and this is a big one...it has no balls! It bottoms out sooo easy! But it is tight and really sounds great at low volumes. I have actually found that the FV12 is tighter than the Velo! But the velo has 23 years of use under it!

So if you are looking for raw output, lows, the legend is a great HT sub. The price is right it looks great and can be placed in a ton of places without suffering any loss of output. Not as accurate but will move you the way the other cant! It isnt as tight or as accurate but it isnt inaccurate or loose for that matter either these other two are just an exception to the rules. The FV12 would be perfect if it wasnt so big and dumb looking! It can get to those lows but doesnt have quite the output it isnt bad on the output but compared to the legend it just cant rock the room and the floor...once again it is still impressive and no slacker at all but the legend with its 2 drivers can really hit it. However, after having the velodyne for so long, I prefer the FV12, it is such a clean sounding sub that every listen has gotten better not to mention it has worked in well.


Nice review !! ... Kinda funny that these 2 Kind of Subs are doing the complete opposite of what they usually are known for : FV12 is the tightest (ported),.. and the legend has more output (sealed & smaller), I guess we cannot assume what we have always thought about (Ported $ Sealed) anymore. Would have loved to have known where the LFM-1 Plus would have fit in with those Subs ????
 
F

FirstReflection

AV Rant Co-Host
Just in terms of what's happening here with the Legend seeming to hit lower and louder than the FV12: it's a perfect example of just how much the room plays into the equation!

With the FV12, it plays down to its tuning frequency - which is just above 20Hz - but then, due to being ported and having a high pass filter to protect the driver, the output falls off like a cliff with a very, very steep roll-off below that 25-ish Hz tuning.

On the other end, the Legend, with its sealed design and dual drivers - it has a rather shallow roll-off. It starts to roll-off higher - although Epik tends to do a fair bit of EQ from what I can tell in order to force the natural roll-off of the design to a lower frequency - but the roll-off is much less steep.

Now, if you took the two of them out to a wide open field where there are no walls or ceiling to reinforce or reflect any bass waves, you'd probably find that the FV12 plays flatter down to its tuning frequency. The Legend would start to show that shallow roll-off. But in an actual room, where there are plenty of reflections and room gain reinforcement, that shallow roll-off means that the effective output - what we actually hear and perceive - can be lower than what the FV12 will produce. The FV12 will happily play down to its tuning frequency, but then the output falls off the cliff of that filter and ported design.

So it's a great example of how we must also consider the room itself as part of the bass system. In a very large room, where the Legend wouldn't get as much room reinforcement, the outcome might be different, where the Legend doesn't seem to be as loud or go lower than the FV12. But, then again, neither the Legend or the FV12 is well suited to a large room, since they just don't have the amp power or driver size to handle the output required in a large room.
 
timoteo

timoteo

Audioholic General
Very true FR about room modes & considering them when dealing with subs!

When i first got my VTF-15h i put it in MaxExtension mode because i wanted it to play as low as it could. But after i did some measurements i found that my room was naturally boosting frequencies below 31hz. I had a HUGE jump in dBs from 25hz down to 16hz. So i put my sub into MaxOutput mode which gives me more output from 50-25hz but drops off very steep below that. Since my room already boosts those low frequencies i get a MUCH flatter response. Then after 3 nights of trial/error adjustments & eq work, ive gotten very good results!!!

Really taught me that you cant just plop a sub down & expect good results. Even with a sub in the best spot in the room, there is still work to be done!!
 
F

FirstReflection

AV Rant Co-Host
Very true FR about room modes & considering them when dealing with subs!

When i first got my VTF-15h i put it in MaxExtension mode because i wanted it to play as low as it could. But after i did some measurements i found that my room was naturally boosting frequencies below 31hz. I had a HUGE jump in dBs from 25hz down to 16hz. So i put my sub into MaxOutput mode which gives me more output from 50-25hz but drops off very steep below that. Since my room already boosts those low frequencies i get a MUCH flatter response. Then after 3 nights of trial/error adjustments & eq work, ive gotten very good results!!!

Really taught me that you cant just plop a sub down & expect good results. Even with a sub in the best spot in the room, there is still work to be done!!
Absolutely! Spot on.

It's personal preference, but I like to muck with the signal as little as possible in terms of digital EQ and filters and whatnot. I much prefer to start with components that just "tell it like it is", which requires that they have flat anechoic response. And I prefer to acoustically treat the room so that the strong reflections off of surfaces are reduced.

But short of actually living in an anechoic chamber (which would just be weird and no fun at all :p ), no speaker or subwoofer is going to actually produce flat frequency response when measured in a room. The thing is, if the speaker or subwoofer is flat in an anechoic setting, then we know that the speaker or subwoofer itself is "not to blame" for the non-flat response that we get in room. It's basically just trying to limit the variables :)

But one of the biggest problems that I've run into is linear power response. As the more recent Audioholics subwoofer reviews have shown, the frequency response does not always retain the same shape when you increase the volume! Sure, a given speaker or sub might produce a nice, flat, anechoic graph when it's only outputting 85dB from 2 meters away, but what about when you want to hit those 105dB peaks in the speakers? Or the 115dB peaks in the LFE? Things can change in a hurry when you turn up the volume. So I'm at the point now where I'm looking for components that not only play linearly and flat in an anechoic setting, but also continue to do so as you increase the volume. It's one of the reasons why I continue to be so impressed with the SVSound PB13-Ultra DSP. Not only did I find it extremely impressive, just listening to it in a dubbing stage, but measurements have also shown that it basically retains the same relative frequency output all the way up to 110dB in a quasi-anechoic setting from 2 meters away. And it does that while keeping the distortion amazingly low. So my ears certainly agree with the measurements on that one! :D

The whole room interaction thing is also why I am ALL for using multiple subs. But at the very same time, it's the reason why I am NOT for the common advice that two or more subs are always better no matter what! It's just not the case. The multiple subs have to work together to produce measureable and audible benefits. So you can't just plunk them down willy-nilly and expect better results than a single subwoofer.

So my whole approach now is:

1) start with components that measure well in an anechoic setting, but also retain their linear output as the volume is increased.

2) Acoustically treat the room to reduce the number and severity of the reflections.

3) Carefully place the seating locations and components, including multiple subwoofers when possible.

4) Listen. Measure. Adjust placement first. Resort to digital EQ when all else fails!

What's perhaps the funniest thing of all though - I might go through all this, but it doesn't make me any more "right". There actually is no "right" or "wrong" when it comes to audio. It's not like video where there are very specific and well defined, measureable calibration standards. When you talk to professional audio engineers and mixers, all they obsess about is "translatability". They carefully select, place and adjust their gear, not so that it necessarily sounds "perfect" in any way, but so that they can personally predict how it is going to sound on OTHER sound systems. They get used to working with a certain set of gear and parameters, but their goal isn't to make what they create sound the same no matter where it is played. Their goal is to make sure that it simply sounds decent on a huge variety of sound systems and most of all, that the most important elements of the mix (things like dialogue or the lead singer) are easy to understand, no matter what playback system is being used!

One of the first things they do with a near-final mix is play it back through some really crappy speakers. Most will play it through one or more car audio systems. And they'll make adjustments to the mix based on what they heard in those far less than "ideal" setups!

So it's important to realize that there is no "perfect" sound system. It's an impossible goal. There is no industry standard. No clear calibration settings. THX attempted to create some sort of industry standard for theaters, and it was a noble goal. Much of what they recommended has become sort of a "best practices" type of knowledge throughout the industry. But the actual number of THX certified theaters is too small to really call it a genuine standard.

When you hear the mix being made in a professional studio, it doesn't always sound the way you might imagine or expect. Some mixers like to use audio monitors that aren't exactly "pleasant" to listen to. Audio monitors are tools. The mixer just wants to hear what he or she needs to hear in order to make changes to the mix. And it's all based on that goal of "translatability". So in the studio, something might sound really bright and harsh, or it might sound really chesty and bass heavy. But then you go and listen to it through a car stereo and it sounds very pleasing! If the goal is to make a track that sounds good in a car, then that's a success! So even trying to emulate what you might find in a professional studio isn't necessarily the best goal. It might be closer to what the professional mixer heard, but it won't necessarily be pleasing, or even sound "right" to your ear.

There are too many speakers, too many different rooms, and too many preferences for there to ever be a "right" setup when it comes to audio. In the end, it really is all about being happy and thinking that what you're hearing sounds great! That said, I'm happy when I can pick out flaws in the recording itself because my audio system is linear and revealing enough to not cover up those errors with distortion or an inability to play certain frequencies. Pro engineers and mixers also appreciate being able to hear new details and errors in existing mixes. But it's more of a "work" thing. And less of a "pleasure" thing ;)
 
S

soapboxpreacher

Junior Audioholic
First...I like your style!!! I would love to have the cash for the equipment and speakers to be able to pickup errors in the stuff I am listening to. I do have good ears...at least I think so. My left makes up so much for my right but I still can hear things that other miss. Drive my wife crazy! I can hear stuff when she cant and she is far closer to the source. But I can also hear lower than she can. We did some tone test a while back and she couldnt here the lower end nor the higher for that matter. I just enjoy great, clean, flat sound it does make things better...I drive the store sales staff crazy...both from what I can hear different to what I bring in for them to play.

In the end the truth isnt what is on paper but what you hear. I get into arguments at some of the other AV forums because so many members are fixated on whats on paper or all the technical jargon they can spew to impress the other members. Many of the forums are discouraging and littered with alot of people who dont have nor heard what they recommend. This I have a huge problem with! But you First really appreciate this stuff in the right way. I find myself on the same page with you. I believe I am keeping the FV12...it really is pretty good for the money...once it is dialed in right. I took the legend back I had a mixed reception from Chad...a little attitude but I am sure it is pride. He has a decent produce..it hits low and can fill the room quite easily but it isnt as tight or clean as the FV12. Plus that Amp got toasty! I recently (I have an addition problem) grabbed a SC2000 and put in the same spot and ran it thru my 8 DVD/BD test scenes that I know well enough to know what is there and what is missing and the SC2000 held its own. Not a bad little sub. I was quite shocked...not to the FV12 tightness or accuracy but output and low end it held up. I have only played it for now 7 hours total (switching back and forth) but it is not bad at all. For HT many would be very happy with it.
 
F

FirstReflection

AV Rant Co-Host
Oh I know all too well about being able to hear, or at least notice, sounds that other people don't seem to pick up! I went to a movie with a friend not too long ago. It's a nicer, smaller theater chain downtown that plays the independent movies and such. I've always noticed that they keep the volume lower than a regular theater and their sound systems lack headroom and dynamic range. Just underpowered sound. But they play movies that other theaters don't and the vibe of the place is really nice, so the somewhat lacking audio is forgivable :)

Well this recent time, we were just sitting down. The trailers hadn't even started, it was just the ads that run before the show starts. We hadn't even found seats and I told my friend that we had to change theaters. He was like, "what?! Why?"

I said, "you don't hear that?" He looks at me with wide eyes, "what?"

I point to the surround speaker on the side wall that was right behind him as he was facing me. "That surround speaker has a broken tweeter! You can't hear that static every time it plays?"

He listens for a second, "what? That little crackle? That's nothing! It's probably someone's phone or something."

"No. It's the surround speaker up there. It's really obvious. I can't listen to the whole movie like that!"

He was just exasperated. It isn't easy being my friend :p

I've got a somewhat similar situation with my hearing it seems. I try to protect my hearing since I value it so much. But my job requires me to drive around all day and talk to people via radio and in person. I keep an in-ear monitor in my left ear all day, but my right ear is exposed. My last hearing test indicated that I have some typical hearing loss of the over 12kHz frequencies in my right ear. I'm almost 31 and there's nothing unusual about high frequency hearing loss at my age, but it's still disheartening all the same :( My left ear though is sharp and has virtually no hearing loss. Pro hearing tests don't really test deep bass very well, but I run my own self-tests using my Shure SE530 in-ear monitors. I can still make out the 18Hz test tone just barely. 17Hz or lower produces nothing, although that might be the earphones themselves just not producing anything :p Still, I never notice anything below 18Hz at all, so it's truly sub-sonic to my hearing.

I share much of your feelings about various A/V boards in general. A lot of "echo chamber" type advice, resistance against anything that isn't the "consensus", and folks jumping on a single review or measurement graph as though it is the be all, end all of "proof".

I try to take as much in as I can. I'm lucky to have an acquaintance who works professionally in mixing who sometimes lets me listen in a dubbing stage or mixing studio. Those TV dubbing stages are like my ultimate fantasy :p Such a gorgeous acoustic space - not the looks (although some of them are nice) - but just the acoustics. No parallel walls. Everything treated. Big sound board just behind the center of the room and seats in front of it. JBL pro speakers everywhere most of the time. Sometimes other brands, like my friend's Focal Pro speakers, but JBL pro definitely seems to be the most popular.

Funny how you had a semi-unpleasant experience with Chad over at Epik over your return. I had a downright horrible interaction with him, which doesn't help my feelings towards Epik's subs :p I still try to be fair - the pair of Sentinels that I had were a very similar case where they definitely played lower than the HSU VTF-3 MK2 that I was looking to replace, but they just didn't have the same tight transient response. Very noticeable overhang with the Sentinels that made the bass "smear" and turned complex bass passages into a bit of a mess. Things between me and Chad got downright nasty before we resolved things. Somewhat to his credit, he does seem to let things go when it's all over. But yeah, getting past his initial attitude on a return can be an issue :p

SVS wasn't always the greatest, but they're almost like an entirely new company now with the new management. An absolute pleasure to talk over anything with them now, it seems like. And I love their new, much more focused approach and that they actually have subs in stock to sell now instead of constantly being on back order like they used to be!

Rythmik still runs like a small company in a lot of ways. But they have the utmost skill in their engineering and they really, really know their stuff. They're open to talk about anything in their designs, it seems like. I just like their attitude of always wanting to do better and taking critiques as a challenge to improve even more, rather than as some sort of unintended knock.

I haven't really dealt with eD, but I've heard several horror stories about slow and unresponsive customer service for repairs or returns. I can't talk at all from experience though, so I have to reserve judgement.

HSU I've always had a good experience with and Dr. Hsu himself is just amazing to talk to. He's so well educated and can just dig into all the theory and engineering at the drop of a hat! With me, responses have sometimes been a little bit slow and I've gotten a little bit of a "we know what we're doing. We don't need any suggestions" type of vibe from a couple of the folks OTHER than Dr. Hsu himself. But it's never been anything less than pleasant.

Anyways, I'm glad that some hard work on the setup on your part has let you come around - at least somewhat - on the FV12. I feel fairly certain at this point that you're hearing the sort of bass that I was talking about when I first recommended it so highly for your $500 budget. I do often fall into the trap of hyperbole. And that's because it so often takes so much to convince someone else - a stranger - to try a product that they weren't already considering. Most of the time, what people are really looking for is confirmation. They already have something in mind and they just want people on the forum to confirm that choice. But I try to be as brutally honest as I can be and get people the best product for their setup and budget. Trying to do that though can push my words over the edge into exaggeration though and I always try to apologize when that happens because it's a disservice to myself and to the people asking for advice.

With the FV12 though, it's hard to convey that this is a $500 sub and what that really means. $500 is rightly a lot of money to a lot of people! A lot of folks are looking for a $200 sub or to spend $500 on their entire set of 5.1 speakers. So to come along and say that I basically think that $500 and the FV12 is the "minimum" for good bass makes a lot of people balk! But honestly, if you try out even the good subs that cost less than $500, it's really obvious that they compromise in at least one area and often more than one area. The FV12 is just the "right" sort of balance in my opinion. It might not troll the absolute depths of 20Hz and lower bass, but it clearly hits flat below 30Hz, which lesser subs simply can't. It IS articulate and has good transient response. Not the final word. But just clearly better than any less expensive sub. And it honestly holds up pretty well against even more expensive subs. And while it can't match the sheer output of larger, more powerful subs, it will play up to its maximum with rather low distortion, which means that you can drive it hard - as hard as it will go - without running into audible problems before you get there. So you can certainly still do better than the FV12, but just not for under $500! And that's why I like it so much because it is affordable and all around good with no really obvious weaknesses like so many other subs. It is ugly - lol. I guess you can't have everything :p If you think the FV12 is big though, you'd really be agape at a VTF-3 MK4 or an SVSound PB13-Ultra or something. Those suckers are HUGE :D
 
Last edited:
H

homwerk

Audioholic Intern
$500 is rightly a lot of money to a lot of people! A lot of folks are looking for a $200 sub or to spend $500 on their entire set of 5.1 speakers. So to come along and say that I basically think that $500 and the FV12 is the "minimum" for good bass makes a lot of people balk! But honestly, if you try out even the good subs that cost less than $500, it's really obvious that they compromise in at least one area and often more than one area. The FV12 is just the "right" sort of balance in my opinion. It might not troll the absolute depths of 20Hz and lower bass, but it clearly hits flat below 30Hz, which lesser subs simply can't. It IS articulate and has good transient response. Not the final word. But just clearly better than any less expensive sub. And it honestly holds up pretty well against even more expensive subs. And while it can't match the sheer output of larger, more powerful subs, it will play up to its maximum with rather low distortion, which means that you can drive it hard - as hard as it will go - without running into audible problems before you get there. So you can certainly still do better than the FV12, but just not for under $500! And that's why I like it so much because it is affordable and all around good with no really obvious weaknesses like so many other subs. It is ugly - lol. I guess you can't have everything :p If you think the FV12 is big though, you'd really be agape at a VTF-3 MK4 or an SVSound PB13-Ultra or something. Those suckers are HUGE :D
Ha! This is exactly how I started out. I began my sound system journey thinking I needed to get a $200 sub or something. Soon after, it was apparent that I needed to get a sub in the $500 range. Now, after WAY too much reading, I am considering subs that are between $1000 and $2000! I will probably come to my senses any day now and buy a sub in the $750 range which should be plenty for my room size.
 
timoteo

timoteo

Audioholic General
Yeah, $750 or a little more you can get a great sub!!!

But keep in mind your room size including any areas its open up to. Also your listening habits. An $800 sub will fill a nice large room with great bass at near reference levels. That is enough for most people since most dont listen at as high of levels as they may think they do. Reference is very loud!!
 
S

soapboxpreacher

Junior Audioholic
I considered doing the SVS SB12-NSD (Outlet has it for 629) or the PB12-NSD but they are a lot more and I dont know how substantially better they could be.
 

randyc1

Enthusiast
So now that I have had the legend and the FV12 these are my observations. The Legend has tons of output!! It fills the room very easily. I honestly thought the FV12 would be better having a port...I was wrong! The Legend also goes lower. It can rattle the house like no other. It is a great looking sub as well! No hum from the Amp but the amp does get a little toasty. I like the feet and it stays put.

The FV12 is tight, responsive, and accurate! It can go lower than my Velodyne and is very close accuracy wise but you have to really dial this sub up...at 75% and I had to dial up my AVR as well. It is an excellent sounding sub. Amp runs cool and it can handle a ton of volume without distorting. But it is big and really ugly! In fact these 2 things drive me so crazy about it I dont know if I want to keep it. If I do, I will make a custom grill for it to make it look less like a sub...but it is big and I refer to it as the whale for it has a nice big blow hole in it!

Both of these subs dont quite have the subtle detail (FV12 is close and getting better) as my velodyne but my velodyne has its own set of issues...for starters and this is a big one...it has no balls! It bottoms out sooo easy! But it is tight and really sounds great at low volumes. I have actually found that the FV12 is tighter than the Velo! But the velo has 23 years of use under it!

So if you are looking for raw output, lows, the legend is a great HT sub. The price is right it looks great and can be placed in a ton of places without suffering any loss of output. Not as accurate but will move you the way the other cant! It isnt as tight or as accurate but it isnt inaccurate or loose for that matter either these other two are just an exception to the rules. The FV12 would be perfect if it wasnt so big and dumb looking! It can get to those lows but doesnt have quite the output it isnt bad on the output but compared to the legend it just cant rock the room and the floor...once again it is still impressive and no slacker at all but the legend with its 2 drivers can really hit it. However, after having the velodyne for so long, I prefer the FV12, it is such a clean sounding sub that every listen has gotten better not to mention it has worked in well.

I have to admit that this review has really got me to RE -THINK my initiall thoughts about PORTED and SEALED for my needs. .. Room is 4000cf , mainly fot HT 75% ,25% Music , I listen at Moderate SPL levels (-15 on amp). I was leaning towards PORTED because of the higher SPL's at Lower HZ for HT, but now i'm not so sure??, ...maybe a (PAIR) of Rythmik F12's will give me all the accuracy AND the Output needed for HT also ,just like the Legend did in this review.?????
 
timoteo

timoteo

Audioholic General
RandyC1:

A single FV12 is 3dBs louder than a single F12. Any time you have dual subs you gain 3dBs (seperated) or 6dBs (co-located) compared to just having one sub (assuming they are identical).

So IF the Rythmik FV12 alone is enough bass for your room, then dual F12 subs will give you the same amout of bass & possibly 3dBs more depending on how you place them in the room. You WILL however gain some accuracy & musicality because of the sealed design. You will also be able to get much more even bass across multiple seats IF placed CORRECTLY!!! Just having dual subs doesnt guarantee better response. The placement has to be right & their phase settings have to be right, otherwise you can get cancelation & actually get a worse response.

Dual subs are always recommended as long as your willing to do your homework & willing to experiment.

So yes i would definately recommend you get dual F12 subs over a single FV12 if you can afford it. Even if you cant place dual subs in their optimal places you can always resort to stacking them & gaining max output.

FYI: I used to have dual 12" subs. I did a LOT of different placement configuations. Some didnt sound good & others sounded great. But i found that there is 1 REALLY great spot for my sub. So i stacked them in that spot & absolutely loved their output!! Only problem was that since my room benifited so much from that one spot i decided to sell the dual 12" subs & get a single 15". So while MOST of the time dual subs is the way to go, its not a rule set in stone.

You should do a "bass crawl" & locate all the good spots to place a sub in your room. If there is 2 or more spots that you would actually be able to have a sub then id say get the dual F12s. If there seems to be only 1 good spot then consider spending what you'd pay for dual subs, on a single better sub.
 

randyc1

Enthusiast
RandyC1:

A single FV12 is 3dBs louder than a single F12. Any time you have dual subs you gain 3dBs (seperated) or 6dBs (co-located) compared to just having one sub (assuming they are identical).

So IF the Rythmik FV12 alone is enough bass for your room, then dual F12 subs will give you the same amout of bass & possibly 3dBs more depending on how you place them in the room. You WILL however gain some accuracy & musicality because of the sealed design. You will also be able to get much more even bass across multiple seats IF placed CORRECTLY!!! Just having dual subs doesnt guarantee better response. The placement has to be right & their phase settings have to be right, otherwise you can get cancelation & actually get a worse response.

Dual subs are always recommended as long as your willing to do your homework & willing to experiment.

So yes i would definately recommend you get dual F12 subs over a single FV12 if you can afford it. Even if you cant place dual subs in their optimal places you can always resort to stacking them & gaining max output.

FYI: I used to have dual 12" subs. I did a LOT of different placement configuations. Some didnt sound good & others sounded great. But i found that there is 1 REALLY great spot for my sub. So i stacked them in that spot & absolutely loved their output!! Only problem was that since my room benifited so much from that one spot i decided to sell the dual 12" subs & get a single 15". So while MOST of the time dual subs is the way to go, its not a rule set in stone.

You should do a "bass crawl" & locate all the good spots to place a sub in your room. If there is 2 or more spots that you would actually be able to have a sub then id say get the dual F12s. If there seems to be only 1 good spot then consider spending what you'd pay for dual subs, on a single better sub.
In Soapboxpreacher's review above ,he says the Sealed Legend would be the choice for HT.


In theory the FV12 should of had more output than the legend being ported ,and bigger, but Soapboxpreacher (thread above) said the Legend had much more output and extension ?

Choosing the best subs for my buget and room is becoming a lot harder than i imagined. I've been reading tons of threads and prefer the ones that come from actual owners of the subs I'm interested in: Rythmik F12 , LFM-1+, Legend.

I've read a post where owner sold his Rythmik F12 for a LFM-1+ and thought it was a better OVERALL Sub for HT and Music ,...and another where the owner did the complete opposite, claiming the LFM-1+ was'nt great with music?

If only there was a (400-800 dollar) 12" mixed SUB shoot-out with Ported and Sealed Subs together .
 
timoteo

timoteo

Audioholic General
There are no free rides when it comes to subwoofers. You have to remember that even though the Legend is a Sealed design, it also has 2 drivers in it. So the FV12 though ported, is a single driver. Even though i dont own either, its easy to understand whats going on with the 2 subs.

The Legend is using more components therefore the quality of said parts have to be of lesser quality in order to compete in price. Physics tells us that 2 drivers will play louder than 1 driver. So yes, for HT the Legend will play lower & louder but at the expense of articulation.

The FV12 has less involved (1driver not 2) but is able to have higher quality parts therefore better sound. Will the single diver play as loud or as low? Probably not.

As far as the 2 different example of owners liking one or the other...its simple, which one are you?

Do you want a sub that sounds clean & accurate but not as "loud" or do you want a "rock'em sock'em" sub that gets loud but doesnt have quite the detail?

Hope you choose a sub that is going to make YOU happy!! I know its hard to make a decision based only on reviews & recommendations but at the same time, your wont know until you bite the bullet.

Between the 2 (legend & FV12) id go FV12. To me, "loud" gets old but "clean" always sounds great & you can always add a second down the road. :)
 

randyc1

Enthusiast
There are no free rides when it comes to subwoofers. You have to remember that even though the Legend is a Sealed design, it also has 2 drivers in it. So the FV12 though ported, is a single driver. Even though i dont own either, its easy to understand whats going on with the 2 subs.

The Legend is using more components therefore the quality of said parts have to be of lesser quality in order to compete in price. Physics tells us that 2 drivers will play louder than 1 driver. So yes, for HT the Legend will play lower & louder but at the expense of articulation.

The FV12 has less involved (1driver not 2) but is able to have higher quality parts therefore better sound. Will the single diver play as loud or as low? Probably not.

As far as the 2 different example of owners liking one or the other...its simple, which one are you?

Do you want a sub that sounds clean & accurate but not as "loud" or do you want a "rock'em sock'em" sub that gets loud but doesnt have quite the detail?

Hope you choose a sub that is going to make YOU happy!! I know its hard to make a decision based only on reviews & recommendations but at the same time, your wont know until you bite the bullet.

Between the 2 (legend & FV12) id go FV12. To me, "loud" gets old but "clean" always sounds great & you can always add a second down the road. :)
Great advise thanks again !!!
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top