In Soapboxpreacher's review above ,he says the Sealed Legend would be the choice for HT.
In theory the FV12 should of had more output than the legend being ported ,and bigger, but Soapboxpreacher (thread above) said the Legend had much more output and extension ?
Choosing the best subs for my buget and room is becoming a lot harder than i imagined. I've been reading tons of threads and prefer the ones that come from actual owners of the subs I'm interested in: Rythmik F12 , LFM-1+, Legend.
I've read a post where owner sold his Rythmik F12 for a LFM-1+ and thought it was a better OVERALL Sub for HT and Music ,...and another where the owner did the complete opposite, claiming the LFM-1+ was'nt great with music?
If only there was a (400-800 dollar) 12" mixed SUB shoot-out with Ported and Sealed Subs together .
One thing that might be causing your confusion is that when we're talking about very broad, general properties of sealed vs. ported subs, we're only talking about the natural, unfiltered and non-EQ'd response that we might expect based purely on the design.
In a case like Epik's sealed Legend and Empire subs, Epik uses EQ to boost the low end output. So even though they are sealed subs, they don't have the "normal" response curve of a sealed sub. Instead, their response curve looks more similar to the natural response curve of a ported sub, where there is a boost in the lower 20Hz area, and then quite a steep drop off below that.
Without the EQ that Epik is using, you'd have the gradual 2nd order roll-off starting up around 50Hz or so that would naturally occur with a sealed design. But because Epik is applying an EQ, you get flatter response out to 20Hz and then a steep drop off.
Another potential cause for confusion is how we perceive "loudness". What we perceive as "loud" is very often distortion or noise. It is very often the case that a person will upgrade to a much less noisy sub that has much lower distortion, and at first, they will be disappointed because it actually seems quieter! If you measure the SPL, you might get a higher reading, meaning that the sub actually is louder at the frequency that the signal is telling the subwoofer to produce! But without all the old distortion and noise, we perceive it as quieter because our brain tells us that noisy, distortion-laiden sounds are "loud", while clean, distortion-free sounds are not.
This happens with regular speakers too. With a really clean speaker that produces almost no distortion, as you increase the volume, it doesn't seem to get "louder". Instead, the voices and instruments just seem to get "closer".
If you take a look at Josh Ricci's measurements over at his data-bass.com website of the larger Epik Empire sub, you can see the sort of EQ boost that Epik is applying. You'll also see the rather high distortion that the sub produces under 40Hz. Looking at those measurements, the Empire appears to start its natural 2nd order roll-off rather high - up around 80Hz or so - but then the EQ kicks in around 40Hz are levels things off, but at the expense of higher distortion. It isn't silly to think that the smaller Legend version has some similar design choices and results from those modifications.
As I've said elsewhere - it isn't just "sealed vs. ported". Ultimately, whether the box is sealed or ported or uses passive radiators doesn't tell you if it's a "good" sub or a "bad" sub for a given preference. It can offer clues, but it is FAR from being the whole story.
In a GENERAL sense, if you are in a larger sized room and mostly care about movies, then you are
generally more likely to find a ported sub that is better suited to those needs - especially if you are keeping the price under $1000. To make a sealed sub play flat and low in that sort of application and room, you need tons of amplifier power and some EQ applied to the lower end response - and that's going to cost extra money. A ported design can be more efficient, and higher efficiency can mean lower cost.
For me, the big considerations for any sub - regardless of design - are:
1) sheer SPL output
2) frequency response (I'm looking for flat response down to 20Hz if possible), but also retaining the same response shape as volume is increased.
3) transient response - how quickly the sound starts and stops when the signal tells it to.
4) audible distortion and noise
I don't really care HOW those parameters are met. I just care that they ARE.
No magic. We're just moving air around here, folks
