Now, you've done it. You've made this a political issue.
Well demonstration of concern won’t help those poor souls from yesterday expect firearms should have tighter laws in the USA now!
I’m horrified.
First off, my sympathies are to those who lost loved ones, those who have had to live through this and to all who, although not directly affected, still shave concerns for their loved ones who are vulnerable by being potential victims in similar situations.
And, to Nichols 50, great post and may He be with you and y'all there.
Now, as it turns out, it was a foreign exchange student from China.
Secondly, as for the guns, before anyone can cry "more gun control", it remains to be seen how he obtained those guns. Very, very few gun crimes are committed by the legal owners of the guns.
And, for Dolby, before coming off so smug, let's consider the logistics of our two countries.
The US has a population around 200 million people and an area of about 9.6 million acres while England has a total population of about 60 million people and an area of approximately .25 million acres.
So, proportionally, you've got about 30% of our population in about .026 percent of the area. Obviously, it's easier to keep the sheep under control in a tiny field, but when you let them run about the entire county, problems controlling them will arise.
Even so, you still had problems with terrorists lately, didn't you? Where did your tight control help in preventing that?
Where we do fall short, however, is in not prosecuting
to the fullest extent of the law, the actual criminals. A slow, steady dilution of the justice system has led to a situation where criminals are not held fully accountable for their transgressions.
IOW, it's not the registered gun owners that are the problem, it's those that obtain them legally.