EX-PRESIDENT INDICTED

[Trell]

Both of those shows sound like what my version of hell would play 24/7

Listing to Trump might very well be worse.

 

[mtrycrafts]

They don't have law experts on, and it showed.

And, if and when they do, they are not in front of a judge so they can fabricate whatever they want.
Just as his lawyer is doing now.

 

[mtrycrafts]

Listing to Trump might very well be worse.

A bucket full of sedatives needed, sitting down so not too far to fall asleep.

 

[Trell]

A tongue-in-cheek suggestion that the wife of a Supreme Court Justice, “Ginni” Thomas, is the sixth perp trying to overturn the election in 2020.

Ginni Thomas Is Probably Not Co-Conspirator 6... Right? - Above the Law

There are several solid candidates for the role.

abovethelaw.com

 

[Swerd]

I give Fox Faux News credit for one thing...achieving their goal.

Ever since the birth of Fox Faux, their goal was to create a militant subsection of the public to blindly follow wherever their warped agenda was heading.
They achieved this to a tee....good going Fox Faux!!

I agree with your point. However, ever since the Dominion Voting Systems lawsuit, it's officially Faux News. I fixed your spelling errors .

 

[Swerd]

The Washington Post, among others, names five out the six unindicted co-conspirators not named in yesterday's indictment.

1. Rudy Guiliani
2. John Eastman
3. Sidney Powell
4. Jeffery Clark
5. Kenneth Chesebro
6. an unidentified political consultant

 

[Trell]

I agree with your point. However, ever since the Dominion Voting Systems lawsuit, it's officially Faux News. I fixed your spelling errors .

I used Fox in a couple of posts in the vain hope of improving search results.

 

[Trell]

The Washington Post, among others, names five out the six unindicted co-conspirators not named in yesterday's indictment.

1. Rudy Guiliani
2. John Eastman
3. Sidney Powell
4. Jeffery Clark
5. Kenneth Chesebro
6. an unidentified political consultant

For #6 there is my post above.

EX-PRESIDENT INDICTED

Both of those shows sound like what my version of hell would play 24/7 Listing to Trump might very well be worse. :D

forums.audioholics.com

 

[Swerd]

CNN summarized the 21 Election Lies by Trump listed in the indictment

https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/02/politics/trump-indictment-lies/index.html
Here's the short version:

1. The lie that fraud changed the outcome of the 2020 election, that Trump “had actually won,” and that the election was “stolen.” (Pages 1 & 40-41 of the indictment)
2. The lie that fake pro-Trump Electoral College electors in seven states were legitimate electors. (Pages 5 & 26)
3. The lie that the Justice Department had identified significant concerns that may have affected the outcome of the election. (Pages 6 & 27)
4. The lie that Pence had the power to reject Biden’s electoral votes. (Pages 6 & 32-38)
5. The lie that “the Vice President and I are in total agreement that the Vice President has the power to act.” (Page 36)
6. The lie that Georgia had thousands of ballots cast in the names of dead people. (Pages 8 & 16)
7. The lie that Pennsylvania had 205,000 more votes than voters. (Pages 8 & 20)
8. The lie that there had been a suspicious “dump” of votes in Detroit, Michigan. (Pages 9 & 17)
9. The lie that Nevada had tens of thousands of double votes and other fraud. (Page 9)
10. The lie that more than 30,000 non-citizens had voted in Arizona. (Pages 9 & 11)
11. The lie that voting machines in swing states had switched votes from Trump to Biden. (Page 9)
12. The lie that Dominion machines had been involved in “massive election fraud.” (Page 12)
13. The lie that “a substantial number of non-citizens, non-residents, and dead people had voted fraudulently in Arizona.” (Page 10)
14. The lie that Fulton County, Georgia elections workers had engaged in “ballot stuffing.” (Pages 13 & 14)
15. The lie that thousands of out-of-state voters cast ballots in Georgia. (Page 16)
16. The lie that Raffensperger “was unwilling, or unable,” to address Trump’s claims about a “‘ballots under table’ scam, ballot destruction, out of state ‘voters’, dead voters, and more.” (Page 16)
17. The lie that there was substantial fraud in Wisconsin and that the state had tens of thousands of unlawful votes. (Page 21)
18. The lie that Wisconsin had more votes counted than it had actual voters. (Page 21)
19. The lie that the election was “corrupt.” (Page 28)
20. The lie that Trump won every state by hundreds of thousands of votes. (Page 34)
21. The lie that Pennsylvania “want to recertify.” (Page 38)

 

[isolar8001]

I agree with your point. However, ever since the Dominion Voting Systems lawsuit, it's officially Faux News. I fixed your spelling errors .

You know what's funny...25 years ago when I started working in group homes, sometimes staff would have Faux News on...eatin' that stuff up.
I would leave the room and refuse to come back until they turned it off.

This was pre Bush Jr. and all that...I knew baseless propaganda when I saw it !!

 

[Swerd]

A tongue-in-cheek suggestion that the wife of a Supreme Court Justice, “Ginni” Thomas, is the sixth perp trying to overturn the election in 2020.

Ginni Thomas Is Probably Not Co-Conspirator 6... Right? - Above the Law

There are several solid candidates for the role.

abovethelaw.com

I saw that … and wish it was true.

 

[Trell]

There are many links to the indictment from various sites, but I failed to find an official .gov link to it yesterday (including on .gov search engine).

Anyone have a link to it?

 

[Swerd]

Judge Tanya Chutkan, a tough Trump critic, toughest Jan. 6 sentencer

The Washington Post
US District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan will oversee the case for Trump's 3rd indictment. Judge Chutkan, a former public defender, was one of the first U.S. judges to reject his executive privilege claims to withhold Jan. 6 White House records. Now, she'll be the trial judge.

 

[Swerd]

There are many links to the indictment from various sites, but I failed to find an official .gov link to it yesterday (including on .gov search engine).

Anyone have a link to it?

Will this do?

Former President Donald Trump's third indictment, annotated

Read CNN's page-by-page annotated analysis of the federal indictment of Trump on four charges related to alleged election interference after his loss in 2020.

www.cnn.com

 

[Trell]

Will this do?

Former President Donald Trump's third indictment, annotated

Read CNN's page-by-page annotated analysis of the federal indictment of Trump on four charges related to alleged election interference after his loss in 2020.

www.cnn.com

Thanks for the link, but no. Previously there been official .gov links available and in this age I this is what I want to link to. I don’t think that the various sites I read, including CNN, have manipulated it, though. But, still, and for a common reference.

Edit: I’m not sure that the CNN excerpts of the indictment is complete.

 

[Swerd]

The Washington Post, among others, names five out the six unindicted co-conspirators not named in yesterday's indictment.

1. Rudy Guiliani
2. John Eastman
3. Sidney Powell
4. Jeffery Clark
5. Kenneth Chesebro
6. an unidentified political consultant

Amber Phillips of the Washington Post:

Why isn’t Mark Meadows among those thought to be a co-conspirator?
Donald Trump’s chief of staff during and after the 2020 election, Mark Meadows, was often by Trump’s side as he was trying to hang onto power. So some find it curious that Meadows isn’t reported to be a co-conspirator — and thus doesn’t seem at risk of facing charges himself.

The omission suggests that Meadows has been cooperating with investigators, speculated Barbara McQuade, a former federal prosecutor.

“That would explain how they have access to a lot of that information about him,” she said.

 

[mtrycrafts]

A tongue-in-cheek suggestion that the wife of a Supreme Court Justice, “Ginni” Thomas, is the sixth perp trying to overturn the election in 2020.

Ginni Thomas Is Probably Not Co-Conspirator 6... Right? - Above the Law

There are several solid candidates for the role.

abovethelaw.com

YES!

 

[Trell]

Amber Phillips of the Washington Post:

Why isn’t Mark Meadows among those thought to be a co-conspirator?
Donald Trump’s chief of staff during and after the 2020 election, Mark Meadows, was often by Trump’s side as he was trying to hang onto power. So some find it curious that Meadows isn’t reported to be a co-conspirator — and thus doesn’t seem at risk of facing charges himself.

The omission suggests that Meadows has been cooperating with investigators, speculated Barbara McQuade, a former federal prosecutor.

“That would explain how they have access to a lot of that information about him,” she said.

I’m not sure that your CNN link above have the complete text of the indictment. Just a feeling that I’ve to verify when I come home as I recall some comments I failed to find, probably my fault. What I recall from a talking head is Meadow calling Pence security after a meeting with Trump 5th January to increase security. Apparently because of this meeting.

I should download the indictment.

 

[mtrycrafts]

...

“That would explain how they have access to a lot of that information about him,” she said.

Yes, with all those date and time stamps one needs actual documents of some kind, text or email, etc.

 

[mtrycrafts]

I’m not sure that your CNN link above have the complete text of the indictment. Just a feeling that I’ve to verify when I come home.

This might be a start:
Court Records | United States Courts (uscourts.gov)
I am looking...
@Mr. Clark should have a good link