The gamble I was referring to was about whether the a3080 will sound as good or better than the z7 that it is replacing. I have only owned Yamaha integrated amplifiers and avr's so I do not consider it a gamble to buy a Yamaha. I just dont want to be disappointed with the sound generated by a new avr. I have learned that sometimes newer does not sound better than old. I am always a Yamaha owner. I will keep you posted, its exciting.
I compared their specs and found:
Power supply - seems very comparable, same power consumption specs, same block capacitance (18,000 ufX2, 71V)
DAC
RX-A3080: ES9007 (datasheet not found online but appears to be same as ES9006 used in the RX-A3060
RX-Z7: AK4384
The RX-A3080's DAC has far superior specs
ADC
RX-A3080: Assuming it is the same as that used in the RX-A3060, it appears to be part of the LSI chip that also does volume control
RX-Z7: Has a separate ADC chip, the PCM1804
Hard to say which is better, I would reasonably guess separate is better in this case because the PCM1804 has much better specs than the one used in Denon/Marantz.
Not trying to disappoint you, but the RX-Z7, while far from the RX-Z9 on paper, was still an excellent AVR. It has a mediocre DAC but the difference are likely not audible.
So aside from codec related factors, I see no reason for you to expect better or even just different sound quality between the two if compared in pure direct mode. Either one should sound just the same as your separate Yamaha integrate amps assuming you would compare them with the A-S700 or higher models.