
gene
Audioholics Master Chief
Administrator
Personally I'd prefer a President with no religious convictions.i think his old man was Muslim. As for Obama, I personally rather doubt he has any deep seated religious convictions.
Personally I'd prefer a President with no religious convictions.i think his old man was Muslim. As for Obama, I personally rather doubt he has any deep seated religious convictions.
Personally I'd prefer a President with no convictions… or indictments.Personally I'd prefer a President with no religious convictions.
What about acquittals?Personally I'd prefer a President with no convictions… or indictments.
So much for separation of church and state. Very sad that most politicians have to pander to the evangelical vote often denying science and reality to firm up their voting base.So would I. I think there was some kind of survey that listed a candidate's religion and how favorable people were to that. At the absolute bottom was atheist.
It's been quite a while since anyone on the Democratic side of the isle has pandered to a religious group. While the engineering/ scientist in you might not agree with it, some people are rooted in faith and it grounds them. To say evangelicals deny science is like saying Muslims are terrorist, bad blanket statement.So much for separation of church and state. Very sad that most politicians have to pander to the evangelical vote often denying science and reality to firm up their voting base.
Yes agreed and incidentally the dems typically don't deny science and education either. It's ridiculous that there is such a division on these issues which should be nonpartisan.It's been quite a while since anyone on the Democratic side of the Isle haspandered
Agreed especially with Citizens United and unlimited campaign contributions. Bernie Sanders is the ONLY current politician running for President that I don't believe panders but he's also unrealistic thinking we're giving free healthcare and college to everybody. That kind of stuff can only happen in a non-JJ Abrams Star Trek Universe.Politicians have always pandered irrespective of country or leaning.
Bernie, thinks that his crossover is racially biased, therefore only speakers that are run full range without padding are openI heard Bernie wants to make sure every student has a 5.1 channel system with Emp-Tek speakers.
Oh really? According to Pewforum.org, 62% of Evangelical Protestants polled don't believe in the Theory of Evolution. An additional 25% think that humans have evolved, but it's by God's design. Only 11% of the people polled believe humans evolved by natural processes. Over 80% believe in heaven and hell. 55% believe the Bible should be interpreted literally. You may not like Gene's tone, but unfortunately the facts seem to be on his side.It's been quite a while since anyone on the Democratic side of the isle has pandered to a religious group. While the engineering/ scientist in you might not agree with it, so people are rooted in faith and it grounds them. To say evangelicals deny science is like saying Muslims are terrorist, bad blanket statement.
What about everyone else? Is there a similar poll? I just quickly picked this one out.Oh really? According to Pewforum.org, 62% of Evangelical Protestants polled don't believe in the Theory of Evolution. An additional 25% think that humans have evolved, but it's by God's design. Only 11% of the people polled believe humans evolved by natural processes. Over 80% believe in heaven and hell. 55% believe the Bible should be interpreted literally. You may not like Gene's tone, but unfortunately the facts seem to be on his side.
http://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/religious-tradition/evangelical-protestant/
Oh really? According to Pewforum.org, 62% of Evangelical Protestants polled don't believe in the Theory of Evolution. An additional 25% think that humans have evolved, but it's by God's design. Only 11% of the people polled believe humans evolved by natural processes. Over 80% believe in heaven and hell. 55% believe the Bible should be interpreted literally. You may not like Gene's tone, but unfortunately the facts seem to be on his side.
http://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/religious-tradition/evangelical-protestant/
Good one. Frightening, isn't it? Ben Carson comes to mind.What about everyone else? Is there a similar poll? I just quickly picked this one out.
![]()
OK well I normally don't like to deal in absolutes so let me rephrase this. Virtually EVERY recent Republican candidate running for Presidency has denied anthropological climate change and human evolution. In fact, Dr. Ben Carson (A Neurosurgeon) believes evolution theory was encouraged by the devil and the Big Bang theory is a fairy tale. This is a similar opinion the Head of the US Science Committee, Tod Adkin, which IMO is NOT the right person to chair such an important position for obvious reasons.It's been quite a while since anyone on the Democratic side of the isle has pandered to a religious group. While the engineering/ scientist in you might not agree with it, so people are rooted in faith and it grounds them. To say evangelicals deny science is like saying Muslims are terrorist, bad blanket statement.
There is nothing wrong being religious or having faith. The problem in my view is when one uses it to deny science. I never understood why people of faith can't embrace the science of evolution as a way of explaining God's process or grande plan of life.The 7th Day Adventists are out there. But religious beliefs cross all boundaries. I mean I'd never have suspected that Colbert was Catholic. And they cross educational levels.
I kinda like Ben Carson but when it comes to President, I've got a tough time not drawing the analogy of him to the character Martin Sheen played in the Dead Zone, Greg Stillson.