Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 136

Thread: Monster Cable Shifts Back Into Lawsuit Gear Against Monster Transmission

  1. #1
    admin is offline Administrator admin should be listened to
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    96
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    1,226

    Arrow Monster Cable Shifts Back Into Lawsuit Gear Against Monster Transmission

    Just when we thought we heard the last of Monster trademark litigations, they’ve defied all logic by attacking one of the last few American companies that actually manufacture their own products - Monster Transmission. After Monster Transmission refused to hand over their name, Monster Cable filed suit and the attorneys are now going to battle. Who knows how long this new case will be dragged out, and how many more will follow. After attacking Disney’s film “Monsters Inc.”, Monster.com, Monster Energy Drink, Timex, Monster Mini-Golf, Discovery Channel and countless others, one has to wonder when will it stop?


    Discuss "Monster Cable Shifts Back Into Lawsuit Gear Against Monster Transmission" here. Read the article.

  2. #2
    Adam's Avatar
    Adam is online now Audioholic Jedi Adam should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Tucson, Arizona
    Posts
    26,508
    Thanks Given
    7,571
    Thanks Received
    9,124

    Default

    Will the madness never end?

    I'm not going to throw out the two Monster cables that I own, but I seriously doubt that I will ever buy another one. This stuff annoys me to no end.
    Mains and Surrounds: NHT 1.5s, Center: NHT AudioCenter-1, Subs: SVS PC13-Ultra, SB13-Ultra, Receiver: Pioneer Elite VSX-23, Amps: Emotiva RPA-1, POS-1, Display: Panasonic TC-P50G10

  3. #3
    ibgarrett is offline Audiophyte ibgarrett is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default I took him up on it

    He said he would welcome email... Here's what I sent.

    I just finished reading the article on Audioholics about how you feel the company is being so wrongly blamed for suiting for trademark infringement. What comes to mind, with all due respect to Shakespeare is "Thou doth protest too much". You certainly have every right to do what you are doing to the extent that you feel is necessary to protect your trademark, however what Monster Cable continues to do is just reckless and irresponsible.

    Seriously, the three lawsuits or threats of legal action that I'm aware of off the top of my head include:
    Monster Golf
    Monster Transmission
    Blue Jeans Cables

    That's without doing any research whatsoever. I can't imagine what I would find if I actually looked it up.

    Seriously - how exactly did Monster Golf or Transmission threaten the trademark of Monster Cable? Basically what I see you doing is using the money you make from your overpriced cables to squash people who are in no way related to your business in any way shape or form. How many employees would a Putt-Putt Golf course actually have? Five? Ten? Are they a chain of Monster Golf putt-putt courses that was somehow encroaching upon the cable business?

    I doubt Monster Cable will ever be getting into Transmissions, or anyone would ever correlate the two.

    And of course after you sent the lawyers after Blue Jeans... that provided some of the best entertainment about stupid and frivolous lawsuits I think I've ever read. The legal team assembling these attacks certainly didn't do their homework before submitting the cease and desist orders. I wonder why you backed off of that suit? Is it because you ran into someone that actually would come back after your company?

    I'm a home theater enthusiast and just finished a major installation in my home, all without a single Monster Cable. Why? It's because of the litigious nature of Monster Cable and what I feel are extremely overpriced products. I make it no secret when I work with other people in speccing out A/V equipment that they should avoid Monster Cable because they are a very poor neighbor in the world of business and that I feel the products are overpriced.

    Lastly, I stopped using Monster Cables long before the litigious nature starting coming to life because after purchasing several of your cables and finding them inferior, I just couldn't justify the expense. I had several cables that I purchased where the connectors would literally have cold solder joints, or such little solder to connect the wire to the cable that the cable would separate from the connector with little to no resistance. This just wasn't one cable, but several, purchased over several months.

    Good luck with trying to defend Monster Cable, but until things change I will continue to be an advocate against your products.

    Brian Garrett

    "Always remember, your focus determines your reality." - Qui-Gon to Anakin, Star Wars Episode I

  4. #4
    Monster Ted is offline Awaiting Registration Conf Monster Ted is either an idiot or an ass
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default

    Hello this is Ted from Monster. After reading the article I wanted to respond quickly to clarify on this issue.

    Monster does not have an issue with Monster Transmission. We advised our outside attorneys several months ago to resolve the matter and they are in the process working that out with Monster Transmission’s attorneys. This case was filed last year, before the Monster Mini Golf Matter was settled. We have learned from our experience with the fallout from the Monster Mini Golf matter that we can be “legally” right in the protection of our trademark, but wrong in the eyes of our customers.

    We now know we have to balance protecting trademark rights with the opinion of our customers. We will always consider and value the opinion of our customers.

    Thank you.

  5. #5
    Alex2507's Avatar
    Alex2507 is online now Audioholic Overlord Alex2507 should be listened to
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Past Hurt ... in recovery
    Posts
    12,118
    Thanks Given
    6,403
    Thanks Received
    6,086

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Monster Ted View Post
    Hello this is Ted from Monster. After reading the article I wanted to respond quickly to clarify on this issue.

    Monster does not have an issue with Monster Transmission. We advised our outside attorneys several months ago to resolve the matter and they are in the process working that out with Monster Transmission’s attorneys. This case was filed last year, before the Monster Mini Golf Matter was settled. We have learned from our experience with the fallout from the Monster Mini Golf matter that we can be “legally” right in the protection of our trademark, but wrong in the eyes of our customers.

    We now know we have to balance protecting trademark rights with the opinion of our customers. We will always consider and value the opinion of our customers.

    Thank you.
    ADAM !!!

    DO IT !!!



    Harry New Year !!! "Never wrestle with a turd. Win or lose, you still end up with sh!t all over you." -Swerd
    "any speaker system in your budget will be an excruciating experience" ~ TLS

  6. #6
    jamie2112's Avatar
    jamie2112 is offline Audioholic Warlord jamie2112 should be listened to
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    in a bong
    Posts
    7,869
    Thanks Given
    3,099
    Thanks Received
    2,557

    Default

    Done Alex........freakin tools. Well its back to letting more people know about this. We all did a great job and I guess we must go a little harder against these Nonsters. Thats it for me gloves are off Nonster cable I officially challange you to a duel. Me and You noel lee out back behind your evil headquarters at 4 oclock tomorrow. Oh wait I have to be here to pick up my MONOPRICE cables that are superior to your crap and 1/10 the price tomorrow afternoon. Oh well you are digging your own grave anyhow. I wish you nothing Nonster..............(insert me giving the finger to Nonster)

  7. #7
    mike c's Avatar
    mike c is offline Audioholic Warlord mike c should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    behind you
    Posts
    9,239
    Thanks Given
    1,560
    Thanks Received
    1,950

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Monster Ted View Post
    Hello this is Ted from Monster. After reading the article I wanted to respond quickly to clarify on this issue.

    Monster does not have an issue with Monster Transmission. We advised our outside attorneys several months ago to resolve the matter and they are in the process working that out with Monster Transmission’s attorneys. This case was filed last year, before the Monster Mini Golf Matter was settled. We have learned from our experience with the fallout from the Monster Mini Golf matter that we can be “legally” right in the protection of our trademark, but wrong in the eyes of our customers.

    We now know we have to balance protecting trademark rights with the opinion of our customers. We will always consider and value the opinion of our customers.

    Thank you.
    then i would recommend you cease and desist ALL your crazy suits immediately. (not just those we read about)

  8. #8
    fast1 is offline On Forum Probation fast1 is gaining some recognition
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    189
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanks Received
    17

    Default

    even if monster wins this battle,they already have lost the war.

  9. #9
    ibgarrett is offline Audiophyte ibgarrett is a forum member in good standing
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanks Received
    0

    Default Reply to Ted

    From Ted's response - Monster does not have an issue with Monster Transmission. We advised our outside attorneys several months ago to resolve the matter and they are in the process working that out with Monster Transmission’s attorneys. This case was filed last year, before the Monster Mini Golf Matter was settled. We have learned from our experience with the fallout from the Monster Mini Golf matter that we can be “legally” right in the protection of our trademark, but wrong in the eyes of our customers.

    Ted - if this were truly the case there would be absolutely nothing to "settle" or "resolve", in fact there never would have even been this case to begin with. It just appears as if you stopped for a little while only to resume to test the waters to see how the consumer base would respond.

    Sorry - just not buying it here.

    Brian

  10. #10
    Adam's Avatar
    Adam is online now Audioholic Jedi Adam should be listened to
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Tucson, Arizona
    Posts
    26,508
    Thanks Given
    7,571
    Thanks Received
    9,124

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alex2507 View Post
    ADAM !!!

    DO IT !!!
    Unfortunately, I went to bed and Jamie beat me to it. I'll have to try on a freshly born spammer sometime.
    Mains and Surrounds: NHT 1.5s, Center: NHT AudioCenter-1, Subs: SVS PC13-Ultra, SB13-Ultra, Receiver: Pioneer Elite VSX-23, Amps: Emotiva RPA-1, POS-1, Display: Panasonic TC-P50G10

Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •