
emorphien
Audioholic General
Vista does command some more resources than XP in some ways (as is usually the case with newer operating systems), but on the whole on similar well configured systems I've found Vista to be smoother and more "robust." Memory wise, I've run Vista on lower RAM systems and it didn't seem a whole lot different to me than XP, particularly once you were at 2GB however Vista will actually put more RAM to use if you have it. In other words it isn't just sitting there going to waste all the time. As a result programs and files I use frequently are accessed much more quickly because of the RAM caching system.
A lot of people hopped on the "eek Vista is eating my RAM" bandwagon because of things like the caching system, but the reality is that when you need it Vista will release the RAM to programs and files you're using and just dump whatever was cached in that memory.
A lot of people hopped on the "eek Vista is eating my RAM" bandwagon because of things like the caching system, but the reality is that when you need it Vista will release the RAM to programs and files you're using and just dump whatever was cached in that memory.