I know many of us have several recordings of various popular works. I know I have at least 5 different recordings of Beethoven's 5th Symphony. I also know it is very easy to create a bias to a certain recording because it is what we are familiar with. For example, I know the tempo the conductor chooses to use is one of the first things I notice. Perhaps a recording has a Double Bass solo that really projects over the orchestra in one recording and in the other it is non-existant.
So what are the criteria a recording must meet for you to really like it?
Here are a few that are important to me:
1. There must be a lot of depth to the recording. It is important to hear all the instruments on the stage. I feel that the timbre and the note building the chord are very important and should not be covered by other instruments. I also feel that there should be a huge dynamic range which adds to the depth of the recording.
2. I generally pick a newer recording over an older one. We all know how much recording technology has improved over the years. It is not as pleasing to me to listen to an older recording no matter how good the performance is.
(Not to say I can't appreciate the quality of a great performance)
3. I try really hard not to form biases on recordings I own and try to appreciate each one for what it is. Unless the symphony was recorded with the composer conducting (in most cases NOT LIKELY) we should understand each conductor will have his own unique style and interpretation. (that is after all what they are paid for)
4. Realism. When I close my eyes do I feel like I am in the concert hall? I know this can have a lot to do with my equipment and my room but, even with that being said I know there can still be a big difference between recordings.
I am very interested in what any of you might have to say regarding this. Even if you disagree.