I had the audacity to offer a dissenting opinion to one of their new moderators. It originaly was post # 9 . The funny thing is that my post is quoted in it's entirety in the two posts following.
http://forums.audioreview.com/showthread.php?t=6481
This is the post that started it.
"I recently purchased a paradigm pw 2200 v2, and I am hearing differing info as to go with a high end subwoofer cable or go with an average cable because some argue that the sound quality difference between cables is minimal. What do you think?"
Several responses, including mine, pretty much agreed with the "minimal" position. Some actually suggested there is no difference in subwoofer cables, save styling and price.
Then, one poster responds with this direct quote "I've found cables to make fairly obvious differences regarding PRAT, frequency extension, resolution, etc."
Now, that's a lot of buzzwords and purple prose, particularly for a subwoofer cable.
First off, virtually knowledegble people have always maintained that cable differences are subtle at best and, even then, is extremely system dependent. So, in light of the use of the word "obvious" in this blanket statement, it's only good, common sense to question the validity (or even possibility the truth?) of such advice, is it not?
Science would truly question the differences between interconnects of similar gauge, length and construction. I've even heard differences myself but they could be explained when the circumstances were examined but, believe me, with functonal cables, "obvious" is not a word I would use to quantify them.
Secondly, does this response reflect the resopndents experience with subwoofer cables? If not, then it's just supposition and has no basis in their experiences and is simply jargon from a magazine.
If so, this response is truly evidence of extra normal hearing abilities, heretofore unmatched by any other mortal.
I'll assume it's his actual experience. Since such comments indicate results unmatched by others, one would assume that further proof could be obtained.
That's kinda like someone telling me they could jump off a building and fly. I certainly would ask to see that! And, unless they could do it I would be within my rights to doubt them and that's all well and good. End of subject as I walk away chuckling.
But, if that person were to suggest that others could also and they should try it, then it would become an issue, would it not? Should not such advice be questioned?
Unfortunatly, that response was from a moderator and when I rebutted him, the post was deleted.
It's a new darkness falling over there when one cannot disagree with management...
