
WmAx
Audioholic Samurai
Why no ported cabinet systems? Those woofers could really do some damage at 20Hz with a proper slot port. 
-Chris
-Chris
A properly designed and built port system is completely transparent and you can use a DSP EQ to obtain ANY signature you want.I'll agree with you to a point... although ported subs are not the end all - be all for bass. Personally I prefer not to have a port contributing in any way to the sound signature presented, I prefer a driver system that retains its air spring/driver loading. I also prefer a manageable, heavily braced cabinet size, where the rear wave is isolated from the front wave. For my bass reproduction I'd rather not hear the subwoofer, just the sound...
There is no question that a ported sub will offer greater SPL and allow a lower tuning and require far less amp, much more efficient design, but it doesn't mean its for everyone..
I'm more then comfortable by running multiple drivers to compensate....
Thanks..... The boxes I'm building now are for the Revo's I just acquired, I got a good deal on them and figured they may be a small but nice step up from the TC2K's, plus I like the look of the black cone better. The Mal-X's were back ordered, and were starting shipping this week. So I hope to see them soon, its been far to long already...Nice work there Warp. I much prefer the bracing in these latter designs. Keep the pics coming.
Which driver are you going to utilize in these again? Where are the Maelstroms?
My wife says that you got to remove the sticker... LOL
Heheheh That keeps drawing my eyes to it as well, but they are already sealed up now, glued them up last night and I'm working on them today trimming and sanding the enclosures, so I should have these 2 up and running tomorrow If all goes well....My wife says that you got to remove the sticker... LOL
You and me both Chris... I know I will get significantly more output from a 1 to 1 comparison just from the displacement area itself (33mm xmax - 40mm Xmech), and roughly the same linear travel as a TC2K (28mm Xmax - Axis - 30mm Xmax) and all the guys that have them running have stated the SQ from them is spectacular, with only 1500w required.... Eq'd they will require more, and I'll be running 3 - 2500w amps, 1 for each. I have yet to see any outdoor measurements, but WillD's straight from the cone measurement in room looked fantastic, but obviously that speaks nothing about distortion. He sold me his TC2K and had no problem moving from it to the Mal-X.I'm very curious if an 18" MAL-X can produce more linear SPL displacement as compared to a TC-2000 15", then how about a TC-3000 15"?
Of course, one will need more power than he has available on hand to find out. The TC-2000 was power limited in the tests on HTTalk with the 2400 watt Tapco amp. Maximum output was never determined as a consequence of not having more power on hand.
-Chris