wah wah red chicklet + politics thread

Alex2507

Alex2507

Audioholic Slumlord
that's not who I want in my government.
I chose this quote because it was an easy platform to jump from.

Who do you want in your government? It doesn't really matter because they are better at being wanted than you are at not wanting them. You can choose not to join them but you ain't gonna beat them, not without blood anyway.
 
highfigh

highfigh

Seriously, I have no life.
Who do you want in your government? It doesn't really matter because they are better at being wanted than you are at not wanting them. You can choose not to join them but you ain't gonna beat them, not without blood anyway.
I want people in government who actually understand why the government exists, not for their personal agendas.

As for your last statement, it wouldn't be the first time and it won't be the last.
 
J

JLMEMT

Junior Audioholic
Packaged securities are hardly a car you can pop the hood on and kick the tires. Such a weak analog is no analog at all. Nice try though.

None of what you said resolves the fact of a 62 Trillion dollar market, a 50 billion dollar ponzi scheme, or an insurance company so large that it can't be allowed to fail.

Banks lobbied hard (that means greased a lot of palms) so they could be allowed to also get into the securitization business (when previously they were expressly forbid to do so). Big business got what it wanted via lobbyists.



Quite correct in that our government has failed us in that regard. Short term patent and copyright was originally intended to inure to the short term benefit of the creator. The long term benefit to civilization in general.

Google for Senator Disney...




No you don't have liberty from Big Business. When was the last time you could make a legal backup/copy of a DVD that you owned?


You seem to miss the major point in this ideology. It is still the corrupt politicians that allowed all of this to happen! Business can't buy their way if the politicians refuse to be bought like they should!

That occurred on both sides of the aisle and they all should go! But don't forget that many of those are Obama and his boys who have been in power for over two years now already. ;)
 
itschris

itschris

Moderator
Last time I checked, more people with increased buying power is better for everyone. Yes, EVERYONE. More people with buying power = MORE PRODUCTS PURCHASED, MORE MONEY FOR SMALL AND LARGE BUSINESS, AND MORE REASON TO INCREASE PRODUCTION AND JOBS. The world doesn't revolve around the sale of multi-million dollar mansions, $100k 103" plasma TVs, and half million dollar supercars. It's not only the "successful" people earning 6 figure salaries making the Toyota Camry the highest selling car in the US.

Not exactly. I'm pretty-well schooled in Finance and Economics. What you speak of is a socialistic model... and I say that not to start the politics about it or somehow demean it. There's a very simple comparitive that I was taught about the economy and how money work within it. It's like studying or doing homework or just work at the office... Working for 10 minutes 6 different time throughout the day is not nearly as affective as working for an hour straight.

Taking $10,000 from somone and give a 1,000 people $10 has not even close to a similar impact on the economy.

The problem with all this stuff is that so much of it sounds so nice... just give so that everyone can be happy and all that. I know, it's all great, but the reality, and at the end of the day, reality is what we're faced with, is that it simply does not work.

Remove the motivation, the carrot if you will and the wheel stops turning. Oddly and ironically, the ones who think everything should be taken from the those with more never ever give credit to what they already give... they equate the benefit only on dollars... not the fact that they create jobs, sustain jobs, and allow others to create a living for themselves.
 
J

JLMEMT

Junior Audioholic
You are in the wrong place.
Around here the rating does not reflect how much you know about audio.
That much, even I know.
I said that when I look at a rating I WANT to know it is about audio. I never said I was naive enough to believe that is all it was. ;)

My personal view, however, is that the rating should be about audio so that is how I use it.
 
Last edited:
Adam

Adam

Audioholic Jedi
I remember the good ol' days when this thread was talking about fast food... :D
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top