
Matt34
Moderator
Just thought I'd quote that.This same thing happened in Vietnam. It takes a nation to win a war, not just an army - keep that in mind.![]()
Just thought I'd quote that.This same thing happened in Vietnam. It takes a nation to win a war, not just an army - keep that in mind.![]()
Chianti for meI am good with wine tooDark hearty reds I like the best.
With that quote in mind, I remember another related one. I don't recall who said it but it goes like this, to win a war you have to break the will of the opposing side to fight. Our enemy has nothing to lose so their will is intact; more than half the people of this country have already given up and Pelosi is trying to capitalize on it. Simple as that. Is it right? Not really, but that's life in the real world. That's politics. Bush may have sent the troops there, but at the time, a large majority of Americans supported the decision. He capitalized at the time.Just thought I'd quote that.![]()
Thing is, the country should have learned this back in Korea. I recently read David Halberstam's "The Coldest Winter", which put the Korean war in a very interesting perspective (I have to admit that even though I'm a history buff, I was very uneducated on the "police action"). In Korea the politicians and the Joint Chiefs (who are just glorified pols in their own right) believed that the country would easily come together the same way they did in WWII- it never crossed their mind that most Americans couldn't give a damn what happens 10,000 miles away in a foreign country. It took a couple years and many dead bodies until they realized that they had to fight a different type of war, even though the war was unpopular at home. In the end- the only winner of this action was the South Koreans of today... no way that country prospers in such a short period if they didn't need to completely rebuild it.If you were not to watch the news you could never tell this country is at war. The only ones that are scraficing anything are the service men and women and their families. It's not like the days of WWI and WWII when the entire country came together to support the war operation, gave up their jobs to build the tanks and planes etc.
First of all, that's not the definition of treason.TREASON - This word imports a betraying, treachery, or breach of allegiance.
Hmm ok I guess your are right. She did not make a statement that constitutes a breech of allegiance at the very least.![]()
EXACTLY......It isn't a question of who took our soldiers to war, my beef is that she can be so audacious as to declare the the war is a "failure" while we still have soldiers over there dodging bullets and IED's. What do you think that does to troop morale?
The gipper ,i love itThis never would have happened with the Gipper, he didn't care for political correctness, the press, or bleeding hearts, when it was time to take out Lybia, no problem
Nancy Pelosi, Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, John Murtha, and the other jerks I can not think of at the moment should ALL BE TRIED FOR TREASON against this countryLet me be clear about something:
I can't stand Pelosi. I think that most of the crap she says is dumb. I think she and her cohorts have been astoundingly ineffective and worthless so far in their Congressional terms.
I do not vote for or support the Democratic party. I vehemently disagree with many or most of their policies. I say the same about the Republican party.
So I'm as impartial as it gets. I don't have a conservative or liberal agenda here. From a purely neutral standpoint, the only justification I can see for accusing Nancy Pelosi of treason is 100% pure political bias. Nothing more.
Putting these people on trial for expressing opinions regarding current US policy would be a travesty. It would be a direct assault on our most treasured freedoms.Nancy Pelosi, Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, John Murtha, and the other jerks I can not think of at the moment should ALL BE TRIED FOR TREASON against this country
In earlier times when this was not a country of wimps they would have all been tried and convicted. Freedom is one thing, but demoralizing our troops and country in a time of war is something completely different. Why is this so hard for some people to grasp. I am sure your are also one of the people who think Bush should be impeached though for lying.Putting these people on trial for expressing opinions regarding current US policy would be a travesty. It would be a direct assault on our most treasured freedoms.
That is a complete fabrication. There is absolutely zero truth to that statement.In earlier times when this was not a country of wimps they would have all been tried and convicted.
Fiction is fun, isn't it? You seem to get significant enjoyment out of making things up.I am sure your are also one of the people who think Bush should be impeached though for lying.
There were people who did less than John Murtha and were convicted of treason. Did Jane Fonda commit treason in your opinion? or was that OK too. As far as the last part that was only a guess. Most people who defend those idiots I mentioned also believe Bush and Cheney should be impeached for lying but John Murtha type stuff is OK.That is a complete fabrication. There is absolutely zero truth to that statement.
I find it incredibly distressing that people in my own country have such an incredible disrespect for the Constitution. It's pathetic, it's sad, and it's very disturbing that there are people in my own country that resent and disrespect freedom.
Fiction is fun, isn't it? You seem to get significant enjoyment out of making things up.
Who?There were people who did less than John Murtha and were convicted of treason.
I have no opinion on Jane Fonda's actions. I was born after they occurred and have never cared enough about her to get all the facts.Did Jane Fonda commit treason in your opinion? or was that OK too.
It is not only those statements but what she and the others have said before. Calling what our troops our doing is a a failure, they are murders, rapist, killing women and children, etc, etc. Those are all disgusting and treasonists things to say about our troops and the effort in general. It has nothing to do with ones opinion on the war itself. Why do you not see the difference if you love our country and freedoms they way you say?Who?
I have no opinion on Jane Fonda's actions. I was born after they occurred and have never cared enough about her to get all the facts.
So you admit that you can't come up with one person who fits your description of having been convicted of treason for "less than" expressing disagreement with the continuation of an ongoing military conflict?hmm, OK I rest my case then