The New "Free Speech" on Twitter

[lovinthehd]

This is on facebook (thought it was Twitter):

"
“One of the content moderators was asked if she deleted every Republican item that came up on her queue, she said: ‘Yes! I don’t give no ****s, I’ll delete it.’


The same moderator said she does not take down anti-Trump content, even if it did not [sic] violate company policy.


‘You gotta take it down but I leave it up,’ she said. ‘If you see something that’s not supposed to be up, it’s probably me.’


Another content moderator, Lara Kontakos, was asked what she did when she saw a posts supporting the president: ‘If someone is wearing a MAGA hat, I am going to delete them for terrorism.’


Then, Kontakos looked around at her colleagues: ‘I think we are all doing that.’”

"

That's not a link and isn't particularly convincing.... like much conservative gossip these days...

 

[Trell]

That's not a link and isn't particularly convincing.... like much conservative gossip these days...

Seems he quoted from here, found by Google search. I guess he’ll have to confirm himself.

Facebook Moderator Boasts Deleting Users For MAGA Hat

‘I am going to delete them for terrorism’

www.michigancapitolconfidential.com

 

[lovinthehd]

I think it's a pretty poor idea to ad-hoc ban a group that happens to disagree with you.

Similar to reading a FB post and considering it fact? You're saying conservative thoughts (or tweets) are not to be found in the pre-musk days?

 

[jinjuku]

Similar to reading a FB post and considering it fact? You're saying conservative thoughts (or tweets) are not to be found in the pre-musk days?

It was a quote that about 3 calories worth of work would have you any number of links you desire.

 

[lovinthehd]

It was a quote that about 3 calories worth of work would have you any number of links you desire.

You were the one making the claim....so thought it would be best to look at your source.

 

[lovinthehd]

Seems he quoted from here, found by Google search. I guess he’ll have to confirm himself.

Facebook Moderator Boasts Deleting Users For MAGA Hat

‘I am going to delete them for terrorism’

www.michigancapitolconfidential.com

Hopefully its a better source than that nonsense.

 

[Trell]

It was a quote that about 3 calories worth of work would have you any number of links you desire.

Since you quoted you could have supplied the link as well.

 

[jinjuku]

Similar to reading a FB post and considering it fact? You're saying conservative thoughts (or tweets) are not to be found in the pre-musk days?

Interesting how you are interpreting all of this. I'm speaking to the fact you said: "castrating conservatives"

 

[jinjuku]

Hopefully its a better source than that nonsense.

It's from a video dude:

Veritas Video Heartens Congressman To Solicit AG Barr For Criminal Referral Related To Zuckerberg | Project Veritas

Investigating and exposing corruption in both public and private institutions.

www.projectveritas.com

 

[Trell]

I think it's a pretty poor idea to ad-hoc ban a group that happens to disagree with you.

Sauce and geese and all that.

 

[lovinthehd]

It's from a video dude:

Veritas Video Heartens Congressman To Solicit AG Barr For Criminal Referral Related To Zuckerberg | Project Veritas

Investigating and exposing corruption in both public and private institutions.

www.projectveritas.com

Oh, that's much more convincing. Plus it was found on the internet?

 

[John Parks]

Twitter Files: FBI Kept Busy Censoring Conservatives Instead of Chasing Crooks
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2022/12/16/twitter-files-fbi-kept-busy-censoring-conservatives-instead-of-chasing-crooks/

 

[lovinthehd]

Twitter Files: FBI Kept Busy Censoring Conservatives Instead of Chasing Crooks
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2022/12/16/twitter-files-fbi-kept-busy-censoring-conservatives-instead-of-chasing-crooks/

Ooh, another quality source post.

 

[jinjuku]

Sauce and geese and all that.

I'll warn you not to intimate that I said something I didn't. I'm not advocating the silencing of a group that I happen to disagree with.

 

[jinjuku]

Oh, that's much more convincing. Plus it was found on the internet?

Are you normally an idiot or are you just trying particularly hard currently?

 

[lovinthehd]

Are you normally an idiot or are you just trying particularly hard currently?

The only idiocy I've noticed is your post/source so far....

 

[Trell]

I'll warn you not to intimate that I said something I didn't. I'm not advocating the silencing of a group that I happen to disagree with.

Warn?

 

[lovinthehd]

I'll warn you not to intimate that I said something I didn't. I'm not advocating the silencing of a group that I happen to disagree with.

You disagree with "conservatives" ? Mayhaps I misread you?!

 

[Trell]

The only idiocy I've noticed is your post/source so far....

And that was to a video he claimed as source. Did he write the quote from watching the video instead of copy/paste from an article?

 

[lovinthehd]

And that was to a video he claimed as source. Did he write the quote from watching the video instead of copy/paste from an article?

I just consider it no more important as a source than rage-fueled am radio,, or Faux.