It was the first time a non politician was elected. The fact that he did some serious talking from time to time and
the economy was doing so well, was enough to cover a lot of mistakes. The fact he lost gave him no time to clean
up the mess. He lost focus and intern lost the second time around. It was his to win or loose. He lost.
At this point anybody could beat Joe, sorry to say. Again it depends on Trump he could blow it for himself and
the party. I've voted for myself the last 45 years. I could care less who's president.
Lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court is a BIG problem for me. It's total BS and not in the best interest of
any country to have life time politicians or appointed anything.. Look an North Korea, Russia and US.
"It was the first time a non politician was elected."
This is factually incorrect. Eisenhowever was not a politician before he was elected. Herbert Hoover was also not a politician before he was elected (there are more).
Hoover and Trump have something else in common. The are two of the biggest losers in American political history. Specifically, Trump is the first president since Hoover in 1932 to lead his party to loses in both houses of congress and the White House in one presidential term.
"Lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court is a BIG problem for me. It's total BS and not in the best interest of
any country to have life time politicians or appointed anything."
News flash: You have a BIG problem with the U.S. Constitution, and you also believe that the U.S. Constitution is "total BS."
Article III, Section 1 specifies lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court:
>>>The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts,
shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.<<<
Article III establishes the federal court system. The first section creates the U.S. Supreme Court as the federal system's highest court.
www.annenbergclassroom.org
>>>To ensure an independent Judiciary and to protect judges from partisan pressures, the Constitution provides that judges serve during “good Behaviour,” which has generally meant life terms.<<<
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/institution.aspx
If you doubt that Article III, Section 1 actually means lifetime appointment, here's what Alexander Hamilton said in in the Federalist Papers:
>>>According to the plan of the convention, all judges who may be appointed by the United Sttews are to hold their offices during good behavior; which is conformable to the most approved of the state constittions….Its propriety having been drawn into question by the adversaries of that plan is no light symptom of the rage for objection which disorders their imaginations and judgments. The standard of good behavior for the continuance in office of the judicial magistracy is certainly one of the most valuable of the modern improvements in the practice of government….It is the best expedient which can be devised in any government to secure a steady, upright and impartial administrations of the laws….This independence of the judges is equally requisite to guard the Constitution and the rights of individuals from the effects of those ill humors which the arts of designing men, or the influence of particular conjunctures, sometimes disseminate among the people themselves, and which, though they speedily give place to better information, and more deliberate reflection, have a tendency, in the meantime, to occasion dangerous innovations in the government, and serious oppressions of the minor party in the community.<<<
https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/constitution-check-did-the-founders-want-term-limits-for-supreme-court-just
My suggestion is to get started on amending the Constitution to fit your beliefs.
